1-7 of 7 results for subject:Shell
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.378 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Shell
- We searched for
- subject_t:Shell OR subject_t:"Royal Dutch Shell" OR subject_t:"Shell Group" OR subject_ses:70018
Year
X
2003
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, What recent representations she has received on the effects of the Shell Haven oil refinery on fisheries in the Thames. (Failed OPQ)
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, What recent representations she has received on the effects of the Shell Haven oil refinery on fisheries in the Thames. (Failed OPQ)
Asked by
David Amess
(Conservative)
Answered by
Ben Bradshaw
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
14 July 2003
For answer on
17 July 2003
Answered on
17 July 2003
Mr. Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent representations she has received on the
effects of the Shell Haven oil refinery on fisheries in the Thames. [126300]
Mr. Bradshaw: None, but I am aware that concerns have been expressed by fishermen at a public inquiry examining proposals for the
redevelopment of the site as the London Gateway port.
Subjects
Fisheries; Inland waterways; Thames estuary; Shell Haven
Date
17 July 2003
Reference
126300; 409 c448W
House
House of Commons
Type
Deposited papers
Committed on
19 June 2003
Originated on
27 May 2003
Received on
19 June 2003
Subjects
Companies; Licensing; Exploration; Oil; Shell; Nigeria; Malabu Oil and Gas
Commons Library location
Dep 9
Date
19 June 2003
Reference
Dep 9 [6163]
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the impact of the Shell Haven Pact proposals in the Thames Estuary on (a) ground water levels in the Castle Point constituency and (b) the fishing industry in that area.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the impact of the Shell Haven Pact proposals in the Thames Estuary on (a) ground water levels in the Castle Point constituency and (b) the fishing industry in that area.
Asked by
Bob Spink
(Conservative)
Answered by
Elliot Morley
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
5 June 2003
For answer on
12 June 2003
Answered on
12 June 2003
Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of the impact of the
Shellhaven Pact proposals in the Thames Estuary on (a) ground water levels in the Castle Point constituency and (b) the fishing
industry in that area. [117994]
Mr. Morley: The Environment Agency has a duty to secure the proper use of water resources in England and Wales. The Agency advises
me that the main water bearing aquifer in the area is chalk which, because it is hydraulically isolated from the surface by being
deeply buried beneath London clay, will not be affected by the Shellhaven proposal.
The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), an Executive Agency of Defra, provides expert scientific
advice on marine and freshwater issues. It has contributed to the current public inquiry into the Shellhaven scheme given the
international importance of the Thames Estuary as an area for sole spawning and juvenile sole. CEFAS has recommended that further
survey work be carried out and assessment made of whether seasonal restrictions on dredging may be necessary to mitigate any adverse
impact.
Subjects
Fisheries; Water; Dredging; Thames estuary; Shell Haven
Date
12 June 2003
Reference
117994; 406 c1015W;406 c1019W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Tony Blair
(Labour)
Asked by
Bob Blizzard
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask the Prime Minister. (Question not printed.)
Subjects
Closures; Redundancy; Shell; Lowestoft
Date
2 April 2003
Reference
402 c909
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on the closure of the Shell plant in Lowestoft and Government help for those made redundant.
1st supplementary on the closure of the Shell plant in Lowestoft and Government help for those made redundant.
Asked by
Bob Blizzard
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
2 April 2003
Subjects
Closures; Redundancy; Shell; Lowestoft
Date
2 April 2003
Reference
402 c909
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Tony Blair
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Closures; Redundancy; Shell; Lowestoft
Date
2 April 2003
Reference
402 c909
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Prime Minister. (Question not printed.)
To ask the Prime Minister. (Question not printed.)
Asked by
Bob Blizzard
(Labour)
Answered by
Tony Blair
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
27 March 2003
For answer on
2 April 2003
Answered on
2 April 2003
Subjects
Closures; Redundancy; Shell; Lowestoft
Date
2 April 2003
Reference
402 c909; 106145
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons