Mr. Hood: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the outcome was of the General Affairs and
External Relations Council held on 22 and 23 November; what the Government's stance was on the issues discussed, including
its voting record; and if he will make a statement. [199753]
Mr. MacShane: The answer is as follows:
Outcome of the 22/23 November 2004 General Affairs and External Relations Council
My right hon. Friends the Foreign Secretary, the Defence Secretary and the International Development Secretary, John Grant (UK's
Permanent Representative to the EU) and I represented the UK at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) in
Brussels on 22 and 23 November.
Conclusions were agreed on: Africa--Peace and security action plan, ESDP, Middle East Peace Process, Iran, Belarus, Sudan, Ivory
Coast, Somalia, and Great Lakes General Affairs Session
Preparation for the 17 December European Council
The Council examined an annotated draft agenda prepared by the Presidency for the European Council meeting to be held in Brussels on
16 and 17 December. It will prepare the meeting in greater detail at the GAERC on 13 and 14 December. The main agenda
items are: EU enlargement, Terrorism, EU financial framework for 2007-13, EU area of freedom, security and justice, and external
affairs (expected to include Middle East Peace Process. Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Afghanistan and the EU Strategic Partnership with the
Mediterranean and the Middle East). The Government are largely content with the current agenda, but will discuss in greater depth at
the 13 December GAERC. Financial Framework For 2007-13 (Including External Actions)
The Council took note of a progress report on preparation of the EU's financial framework for the 2007-13 period and held a policy
debate on the Commission's proposals as regards financing of the EU's external actions policies. The Presidency noted that most
delegations agreed with the proposal to simplify the structure of the EU budget. Many delegations considered that the proposed new
financing instruments for external relations would allow the Council adequate political control, although a number highlighted
conditions to be respected and emphasised the role to be played by the member states. The Government emphasised the need for a
budget structure which enabled the EU to meet its priorities flexibly. The Presidency's aim is for the European Council in December
to define the principles and guidelines for further work on the new financial framework with the aim of achieving political
agreement next year.
The Government have argued that the Commission's proposal for real terms spending increases of 35 per cent. from 2007 to 2013
are unrealistic and unacceptable. We believe that the priorities of an enlarged Union can be met within a budget of 1 per
cent. EU GNI. We have therefore argued for a robust assessment of the value added of EU spending in order to ensure that EU spending
is focussed and effective. External Relations Session
ESDP
Defence Ministers approved the six-monthly Single Progress Report on capability development and their declaration on development of
military capabilities. In particular, this declaration included commitments from member states to hold battlegroups at very high
readiness from 2005. The GAERC also approved the 2005 budget and work programme of the European Defence Agency, and Defence
Ministers (meeting in Agency Steering Board format) also agreed conclusions on the European Commission's Green Paper on defence
procurement. The GAERC also agreed to launch the EU operation in Bosnia (EUFOR) on 2 December.
Improving European defence capability is one the Government's key aims for ESDP, and the Government have played a major role in the
capability development commitments which the Council approved, in particular the battlegroups concept. The UK has offered one
national battlegroup and one joint battlegroup with the Netherlands to the EU's co-ordinated pool of battlegroups for full
operational capability from 2007. Together with France, the UK will provide the EU's initial operational capability in the first
half of 2005. The Government supports the agreed European Defence Agency work programme, and the UK is providing the EU Force
Commander in Bosnia for the first year. Middle East Peace Process
Foreign Ministers discussed the Middle East Peace Process over lunch. The Council expressed its condolences to the Palestinian
people on the occasion of President Arafat's death and commended the approach of the current leadership in organising a smooth
transition. The Council reiterated its commitment to pursue the short-term programme of action proposed by High Representative
Solana to the European Council and concluded that immediate action is required to support the presidential elections, to improve the
security situation and to provide financial support to the Palestinian Authority. The Foreign Secretary agreed with this approach
and highlighted that the EU had an opportunity to play a stronger role. He briefed the Council on my right hon. Friend the Prime
Minister's positive discussion with President Bush in Washington. Iran
Foreign Ministers also discussed Iran over lunch. They welcomed the agreement on nuclear issues and future cooperation following
talks with France, Germany and the UK (E3) supported by the High Representative. The Council welcomed Iran's decision to suspend
fully all enrichment related and reprocessing activities, and to sustain this suspension while negotiations are underway on an
agreement on long- term arrangements. It expected Iran to take the steps necessary to enable the IAEA to report on
25 November that full suspension was in place. The Council confirmed the EU's readiness to explore ways to develop political
and economic co-operation with Iran. It recalled the conclusions of the European Council on 5 November that negotiations on a
Trade and Co-operation Agreement would resume as soon as suspension was verified. As part of the E3, the Government played a major
part in negotiating Iran's decision to suspend fully all enrichment related and reprocessing activities. Eu-China Relations
Over lunch Ministers addressed EU-China relations, in preparation for the EU-China Summit on 8 December 2004. A large number
of subjects will be discussed at the summit with a view to raising the relationship between the EU and China to a higher level. More
specifically, with regard to the arms embargo, the Presidency confirmed, following the discussion, that the EU was ready to give a
positive signal to China. However, at the same time a number of concerns must be addressed, including in the field of human rights,
and work must continue on strengthening the EU Code of Conduct on arms exports.
The Government supports the decision of the European Council in December 2003 to review the EU Arms Embargo on China. This review is
ongoing--it was last discussed by EU Foreign Ministers at the 11 October GAERC. The Government does not wish to exclude any
options for the review, nor to pre-empt the conclusion of the review. The Government continues to implement the Arms Embargo as set
out by the then Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the late Derek Fatchett, in his reply to my hon. Friend
the Member for Gedley (Vernon Coaker) on 3 June 1998, Official Report, columns 240-41. Ukraine
There was widespread concern within the Council over the Ukrainian electoral process, as well as at the likely outcome. The Council
considered next steps and they issued a Presidency statement calling on the Ukrainian authorities to review together with OSCE/
ODIHR the electoral process and results.
Subsequent to the GAERC the Foreign Secretary made a statement on 23 November urging the Ukrainian authorities to cooperate
with the OSCE to ensure that all proper procedures, including legal challenges to the results, are fully followed before declaring a
final result. A copy of the Statement is available on the FCO website: www.fco.gov.uk/policy/ news/press-releases. The Ukrainian
authorities should investigate all allegations of fraud to ensure that the result reflects the democratic will of the Ukrainian
people. We will closely monitor the situation with our EU partners. Belarus
The Council called upon President Lukashenko and his government to reverse their present policies and to embark on fundamental
democratic and economic reforms. The Council noted with concern that the 17 October 2004 parliamentary elections and
referendum in Belarus were not conducted in a free and fair manner. The Council strongly condemned the attacks on peaceful
demonstrators, individual opposition leaders and journalists that took place after 17 October. The Council agreed to continue
to follow developments in Belarus closely and will take further action as appropriate. The Government supports this approach. Athena
Financing Mechanism
The Council examined if the ATHENA mechanism for the financing of the common costs of EU-led military operations could better meet
the needs of EU Rapid Response, in terms of transportation of the forces and early provision of funds to ATHENA. It came to no
agreement and tasked the relevant Council bodies, in relation with the EU Military Staff and the ATHENA administrator, to continue
reflecting on the most appropriate ways and means to finance EU Rapid Response.
The Government believes the the costs of deployment should normally fall to member states and should not automatically be financed
in common. It is important to maintain incentives on member states to improve their capabilities in this area and to find the most
effective means of deploying their forces. The Government's position received considerable support from the other partners. The
Government are able to provide funds rapidly to the ATHENA mechanism when required, and therefore does not intend to participate in
a common fund for this purpose. Cote D'Ivoire
The French Foreign Minister, Michel Barnier, briefed on recent events. Almost all French nationals had now departed. The Dutch
Foreign Minister Bot, speaking as the Presidency, informed Foreign Ministers that South African President Mbeki had debriefed him on
his recent discussions with the key figures in the Cote d'Ivoire crisis. The Government shares the international community's
condemnation of the Government of Cote d'Ivoire's breach of the cease-fire and the ensuing attacks on foreign residents. The
Government continues to believe that there can be no military solution to the conflict and supports the UN and AU in their efforts
to find a political settlement. Great Lakes
The Council welcomed the outcome of the First Summit for Heads of State of the AU-UN International Conference for peace and security
in the Great Lakes region. The Council stressed the importance of this process leading to a final outcome that will lead to lasting
peace and stability, good governance, democracy and respect for human rights, socio-economic development and regional integration.
The Council re- iterated the willingness of the EU to continue its support, through the Group of Friends of the Conference, to the
preparatory process for the second summit to ensure its successful outcome. The Government will do what it can to assist this
process and is planning to contribute US$1 million to the Conference. Sudan
The Council welcomed the urgently needed deployment of the military elements of the expanded African Union (AU) force in Darfur
(AMIS II) and the leading role of the AU. It will consider, in close discussion with the AU, possible support for the implementation
of the policing elements of AMIS II. The Council welcomed the progress achieved at the peace talks in Abuja and noted that there is
urgent need for additional humanitarian assistance. The EU has already provided more that è325 million from bilateral and
Community funds for 2004 but substantial additional amounts need to be raised. The EU will consider increasing its humanitarian
support, while encouraging other donors to provide additional support for humanitarian operations.
The Government welcomes the unanimous UN Security Council Resolution 1574. There is an urgent need for progress in resolving the
Dafur crisis and to maintain the pressure on both sides (Government of Sudan and rebels) to abide by the commitments they have
given. The Government welcomes the AU's efforts to resolve the crisis in Darfur both through the peace talks in Abuja and through
its monitoring mission on the ground. The Government will continue to press the EU to consider actively what it can do to assist and
reinforce the AU's efforts. Somalia
The Council reviewed recent developments in Somalia, in particular the establishment of the Transitional Parliament, the election of
Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed as President and the appointment of Ali Mohamed Ghedi as Prime Minster. The Council would welcome the early
establishment of a broad-based government in Somalia. The Council reiterated its support for the efforts of all parties seeking
peace and reconciliation in Somalia and stands ready to work with the United Nations and all relevant international organisations in
supporting the peace and reconciliation process and the transition to a federal state. The Government feels it is important that the
international community actively support the framework for a UN led dialogue with the Transitional Federal Government. AOB--Guinea
Bissau
Portuguese Foreign Minister Monterio gave an update on the mission of the Lusophone Community which had the objective of promoting
dialogue between the government and the military and whose conclusions would focus on security sector reform. Further funding was
requested. The Government currently provides multilateral support through the UN, EU and International Financial Institutions. It
supports the initiative for the Lusophone Community to send a small mission to promote dialogue between the military and political
communities in Guinea-Bissau. Development Agenda--23 November 2004
2005 Millennium Development Goals Stocktake
Conclusions were adopted which outlined a collective EU approach to the 2005 Millennium Summit's stocktake on achieving the
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), via a joint EU report focused on aid resources and new financing mechanisms, coherence of aid
and other polices, plus a new initiative on Africa. The Government stressed that the Summit must acknowledge that progress in
meeting the MDGs was much too slow, and that changes in policies were needed. The key issues were to increase aid resources; debt
relief, where the UK hoped others would follow our initiative to pay off the outstanding debts of the poorest countries for the
IFIs; innovative financing mechanisms; and improving trade opportunities for developing countries. Follow up to the International
Conference on Population and Development (ICPD)
Member states adopted two sets of Conclusions giving the Commission a renewed mandate to pursue its policy on these issues. The EU
has played a prominent role in the ICPD context from the start and its policy and approaches are now fully aligned with the Cairo
(ICPD) agenda. But more funding was needed to implement the Cairo action plan. Also, poverty diseases, especially HIV/AIDS, remain a
major cause of death as indicated by shocking new figures recently revealed by UNAIDS. The Government are particularly pleased to
see the links that the Conclusions make between Sexual and Reproductive Health HIV. HIV and AIDS will be a priority during the UK
Presidency of the EU and G8 next year. Monterrey Follow Up
Conclusions and the Action Plan on harmonisation were agreed. The Action Plan was drawn up by a special working party of member
states' experts and will be submitted to the Second OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) High Level Forum on Harmonisation
and Alignment for Aid Effectiveness in Paris 2005. The government welcomed the Action Plan. It sets out minimum standards for member
states and the Commission when working with one another and partner countries. But the Government considers that the EU should still
strive to do more and learn from successes such as in Mozambique and Vietnam, and initiatives in conflict countries such as Sudan
and Democratic Republic of Congo. Annual Report 2004 on EC Development Policy and External Assistance
This is one of the principle tools available to assess EC's external actions programmes. The Government welcomes this report as a
marked improvement on previous years. However, it is still not the strategic management tool we would like it to be. It should be
more analytical and focus on progress against strategic objectives, such as global poverty reduction, the MDGs and EC's Development
Policy Conclusions, reflecting the UK's concerns, were agreed.