Skip to main content

1-20 of 35 results for subject:Summertime

Year X
2005

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Is the Leader of the House aware that, according to experts, up to 500 people are killed needlessly each year as a consequence of our maintaining the ridiculous ritual of putting our clocks back every autumn? Could we have a debate on the benefits of extending summertime throughout the year?...

Member
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
15 December 2005
Reference
440 c1457
House
House of Commons

I know that the Conservative party is finally in a phase of modernisation, but I believe that it was once known as the Conservative and Unionist party. I realise that the right hon. Gentleman’s observations may somewhat reflect the rather poor performance that the Conservative party has achieved in Scotland...

Member
Geoffrey Hoon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2005
Reference
440 c1457
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I beg to introduce a Bill to advance time by one hour throughout the year for an experimental period, and for connected purposes. I beg to move that this Bill be now read a first time. Moved, That the Bill be now read a first time.—(Lord Tanlaw.) On Question, Bill...

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
676 c217
House
House of Lords

Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill [HL]. Presentation and first reading.

Lead member
Lord Tanlaw
Type
Debates on bills
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
676 c217
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the (a) advantages and (b) disadvantages of the United Kingdom moving to Central European Time; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 November 2005
Reference
27316; 439 c1259W;439 c1261W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what research he has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the effect on the number of additional deaths and serious injuries on roads each year of turning back the clocks in October.

Asked by
David Kidney (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2005
Reference
27094; 439 c785W;439 c786W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if Her Majesty's Government will accept the recommendation of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents for a three year pilot of single/double summer time to establish whether lighter evenings all year round will reduce road casualties.

Asked by
David Kidney (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
26480; 439 c527W;439 c527W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what research he has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the effects on accidents at work of turning back the clocks each October.

Asked by
David Kidney (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
439 c527W;439 c527W; 26481
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what research he has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the effects on numbers of road casualties of turning back the clocks in October each year.

Asked by
David Kidney (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
26482; 439 c514W;439 c513-4W
House
House of Commons
My Lords, I am glad that the Minister recognises that there is a theological dimension to the issue. I can assure the House that whatever happens to the clocks, the Bishops will be up at the same time in the morning saying their prayers. Does the Minister think that the pressure towards extending summer time is a reflection of the general decadence of our society, with people getting up later in the morning?
Asked by
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c389-90
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is it not the case that the climate of opinion has changed enormously in the past few years? Members on all sides of the House have expressed concern about active lifestyles, particularly in regard to young children who come home from school and have no time to play outside. Yet we are criticising them for becoming obese and so on. Is it not now time for the Government to look at the issue and follow the excellent suggestions made by the noble Lord, Lord Tanlaw?
Asked by
Baroness Billingham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c388
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I live in Northern Ireland and do business there. Does the Minister agree that it is a disincentive to UK trade for our exporters to be potentially out of communication with customers in mainland Europe for two, and possibly four, hours in the business day? We have to commence and finish business one hour before our European competitors.
Asked by
Lord Rogan (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c389
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we debated the subject in this House about 18 months ago and perhaps I may repeat the remarks I made. A businessman travelling from London to Paris leaves London at eight in the morning and arrives in Paris at 10; a businessman travelling from Paris to London leaves Paris at eight and arrives in London at eight. That is a huge commercial disadvantage. Furthermore, I do not understand how, with the greatest respect to the farmers in the northernmost parts of the Union, that the time matters quite so much. The cows do not look at the clock, but our competitors in Frankfurt and in Paris do. We should recognise that as soon as possible.
Asked by
Lord Levene of Portsoken (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c390
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is there not a case for taking a good long look at this matter under agreed criteria so that we can come to a conclusion and move on? It has become a hardy perennial of the parliamentary scene.
Asked by
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c389
House
House of Lords
My Lords, that is all very well, but is there any other aspect of policy where, if it could be shown that several hundred, if not a thousand, lives—many of them children’s lives—could be saved, the Government would say, ““No, there are arguments on both sides.””? Will the Government not accept that this is a simple proposition and even in the northern parts of the country—in Scotland and Northern Ireland—lives would be saved by changing the clocks in the way that the Question suggests? When else will the Government turn their back on saving lives?
Asked by
Lord Dubs (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c389
House
House of Lords
My Lords, cannot the problems that the Minister rightly states would be suffered by relative minorities be met by those minority communities adjusting their lifestyles to the conditions prevailing? Is that not demonstrated by China, which has one time zone extending from Shanghai practically to Samarkand and is able to cope with the situation? The central European time zone extends from Warsaw and Stockholm to Gibraltar and Coruna and those countries are able to cope. Would it not be hugely to the advantage of most people in this country if we had a time pattern coinciding with that of our neighbours? It would give us coincidental office hours and we would not have to adjust railway and plane timetables.
Asked by
Lord Howe of Aberavon (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c388-9
House
House of Lords
My Lords, there are no plans to change the summer time arrangements at this time. The last experiment with lighter evenings, between 1968 and 1971, proved unpopular and was abandoned following a vote in Parliament. Objections were raised by the farming and construction industries and others involved in outdoor work, particularly in the north of England and Scotland, which experienced difficulties because of the late sunrise in winter. Any change would need to have full regard to all the factors involved, including the impact on social and community life, transport links with other countries, health and safety issues, such as road traffic accidents, and the views of the business community and other stakeholders.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c387
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his Answer, which I shall study with care. Have the Minister and noble Lords on the Front Benches opposite any good reason for not supporting a fact-finding Bill to gain fresh statistics for lighter evenings in the winter? Such a Bill could cover a two-year experimental period of Single/Double Summer Time, starting from the last Sunday in October 2006, and contain a Scottish clause for ratification by the devolved Parliament north of the border. If such a long-overdue but simple measure could find support from the motoring industry, tourism, business and bodies such as the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, as I suspect it would, why can we not just do it and get on with it?
Asked by
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c387-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the facts are very clear. There was a re-examination of injuries which would be avoided if the change were made. The facts are that you would save 100 lives and 300 serious injuries each year. Those figures are based on what happened in 1968–71, so they have been known for an extremely long time. Parliament, knowing those figures, took the decision it did.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c389
House
House of Lords
My Lords, there would be much to be gained if we could. This looks to me like an insuperable problem. A colleague of mine once described it as being rather like a poisoned chalice without any clear sign of where the chalice is.
Answered by
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
675 c389
House
House of Lords