Skip to main content

1-20 of 104 results for subject:Trams

Year X
2005

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions have taken place between officials in his Department and the chief executive and officials of Liverpool city council since June; what means of communication were used in each case; and if he will place in the Library the (a) minutes...

Asked by
George Howarth (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
35195; 440 c2919W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much funding has been (a) allocated and (b) spent directly by his Department on (i) the Leeds Supertram scheme and (ii) light rail schemes in England.

Asked by
Greg Mulholland (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
37869; 440 c2918W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the relative costs of ultra light rail compared with (a) guided busways and (b) conventional train systems.

Asked by
Colin Challen (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
440 c2323W; 34004
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list departmental meetings held in relation to (a) Manchester, (b) the Sheffield tram system and (c) the Nottingham tram system programmes.

Asked by
George Howarth (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
26550; 440 c2027W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions he has had with ministerial colleagues in respect of Mersey Tram Line 1.

Asked by
George Howarth (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 December 2005
Reference
440 c2027W; 26549
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to his statement of 3 November 2005, OfficialReport, columns 60–62WS, on Leeds supertram, what funding his Department plans to provide for a Leeds rapid bus scheme.

Asked by
Paul Truswell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
35473; 440 c1858W;440 c1858W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when a decision will be announced on the funding of the Fareham-Gosport-Portsmouth light rapid transit scheme.

Asked by
Peter Viggers (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2005
Reference
440 c1313-4W;440 c1313-4W; 33619
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 21 November 2005, Official Report, column 1542W, on Merseytram services, if he will publish the evidence on which he based his statement on the promoters' assessment of regeneration and employment impacts; and when he discussed this issue...

Asked by
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2005
Reference
440 c1120W;440 c1120W; 33466
House
House of Commons

Economic Impact Report assessment: Merseytram line 1. By Sarah Love. 3 p.

Deposited by
Department for Transport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
6 December 2005
Reference
DEP 05/1610
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on light rail

Lead member
Paul Rowen
Answering member
Derek Twigg
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c77-100WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman rightly talks about the long-term costs and benefits, but other social, environmental and wider economic costs must be taken into account, and when they are, trams seem to be a very good buy.

Member
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c78WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Rochdale (Paul Rowen) on having secured the debate. Let me remind the House that in October last year we held a similar debate on the future of light rail after the Secretary of State announced the cancellation and withdrawal of funds from three tram...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c80-1WH
House
House of Commons

On my hon. Friend's point about regeneration, if we take a city or conurbation such as Greater Manchester, it is obvious that the existing Metrolink has had a regenerative effect there, and that it is a vital part of plans for the future. The lack of joined-up government on this...

Member
Tony Lloyd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c81-2WH
House
House of Commons

: I agree with the hon. Gentleman. There is no doubt that where trams are used regeneration has occurred and, as in Manchester, areas have been developed and improved. Before considering what action should be taken to put light rail back on track, I want to look at the Manchester...

Member
Paul Rowen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c78-80WH
House
House of Commons

: I am very supportive of the hon. Gentleman, but he talks about ROSCOs buying trams, and on the railways ROSCOs charge extortionate amounts—up to 30 per cent. per year. Surely trams can be bought by the public sector at a reasonable return. It would just take the Government to...

Member
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c80WH
House
House of Commons

: I agree that the costs are high. However, I am trying to suggest a way forward in case the Government are not prepared to commit any more public money. I would far rather they treated light rail as they treat road schemes, on which it does not seem to...

Member
Paul Rowen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c80WH
House
House of Commons

I shall confine my remarks to Merseytram line 1 and lines 2 and 3, which would have followed had it gone ahead. The line has been in the making for the past five or more years, with strong support from Liverpool city council—in principle, at any rate—and huge support from...

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c84-6WH
House
House of Commons

My constituency of Gosport is based on a peninsula, and the neighbouring town of Fareham is rapidly developing. The link between Gosport and Portsmouth is across a narrow 4,600 yd channel. The whole area is regarded as being ideally suitable for a light rail transit system, because road access is...

Member
Peter Viggers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c83-4WH
House
House of Commons

: My hon. Friend makes a profound and important point, which the Transport Committee has made to Ministers a number of times. Local transport plans have four objectives, and not one of them is regeneration. It clearly should be, because the people who run our great cities say that regeneration...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c82-3WH
House
House of Commons

: May I make it clear that that reflected Liverpool city council's legal advice? It said that it could not rely on assurances from the PTA without further due diligence work. It was in respect of that that I made my comment.

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c86WH
House
House of Commons