Search Results

1-9 of 9 results for subject:Wolverhampton

Show detailed: On Off

Results: 10 20 50 100

Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many younger adult clients per 10,000 younger adults were seen by social services in (a) Inner London local authorities, (b) Outer London local authorities, (c) English metropolitan authorities outside London, (d) Wigan Metropolitan borough council area, (e) Salford city council area,...

Asked by

Neil Turner (Labour)

Answering body

Department of Health

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

14 November 2005

For answer on

16 November 2005

Answered on

6 December 2005

The following table shows the number of adults aged 18 to 64 who were assessed and/or reviewed per 10,000 population by councils with social services responsibilities (CSSRs) in 2003–04 for the areas requested.

Number of adults aged 18–64 who were assessed and/or reviewed per 10,000 population by councils in 2003–04
Councils with social services responsibilities	Number of new clients who have been assessed by councils per 10,000 population	Existing clients who have been reviewed by councils per 10,000 population
Inner London
Camden	45	55
Greenwich	68	67
Hackney	11	—
Hammersmith and Fulham	75	76
Islington	38	33
Kensington and Chelsea	125	244
Lambeth	15	100
Lewisham	132	114
Southwark	148	146
Tower Hamlets	46	111
Wandsworth	33	54
Westminster	65	110
City of London	95	281

Outer London
Barking and Dagenham	68	137
Barnet	41	26
Bexley	165	205
Brent	184	116
Bromley	115	122
Croydon	36	125
Ealing	32	30
Enfield	32	76
Haringey	34	78
Harrow	38	38
Havering	13	112
Hillingdon	8	49
Hounslow	64	87
Kingston-upon-Thames	91	152
Merton	45	60
Newham	6	105
Redbridge	51	88
Richmond upon Thames	39	77
Sutton	22	55
Waltham Forest	83	67

Metropolitan districts
Barnsley	84	203
Birmingham	60	85
Bolton	95	142
Bradford	48	103
Bury	46	46
Calderdale	25	34
Coventry	63	56
Doncaster	52	36
Dudley	46	83
Gateshead	86	78
Kirklees	58	153
Liverpool	39	83
Manchester	43	86
Newcastle upon Tyne	79	80
North Tyneside	66	151
Oldham	94	96
Rochdale	22	103
Rotherham	46	79
Sandwell	43	82
Sefton	41	66
Sheffield	95	39
Solihull	31	80
St. Helens	56	137
Stockport	44	36
Sunderland	39	162
Tameside	160	277
Trafford	71	81
Wakefield	28	87
Walsall	18	50
Wirral	51	94
Wigan	40	60
Salford	47	60
Knowsley	40	—
South Tyneside	81	249
Leeds	36	50
Wolverhampton	39	60
Source: RAP proforma Al
⁽²⁶⁾ An ““assessment”” is defined as the first assessment for a new client. All subsequent assessments which include a reassessment will be defined as a review.
⁽²⁷⁾ A ““review”” is an examination of the client's needs for an existing client and must include a (formal) reassessment, irrespective of whether it was a scheduled or unscheduled review.
⁽²⁸⁾ Data not available.

Date

6 December 2005

Reference

440 c1238-40W;440 c1238-40W; 29474

House

House of Commons

Education Funding

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the expenditure was per pupil in Wolverhampton in 1996–97; and what the equivalent figure was in 2004–05.

Asked by

Pat McFadden (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Education and Skills

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

16 November 2005

For answer on

21 November 2005

Answered on

22 November 2005

The information requested is contained within the following table:

Combined LEA and school-based expenditure1 per pupil2 in Wolverhampton LEA 1996–97 and 2004–053, 4
	£
1996–97	2,740
2004–05	4,210
Note: Figures are as reported by Wolverhampton LEA and are rounded to the nearest 10.
⁽⁴⁵⁾ The combined LEA and school-based expenditure includes all expenditure on the education of children in LEA maintained establishments and pupils educated by the LEA other than in maintained establishments. This includes both school-based expenditure and all elements of central LA expenditure except youth and community and capital expenditure from revenue (CERA).
⁽⁴⁶⁾ Pupil figures include all pre-primary pupils, including those under-fives funded by the LEA and being educated in private settings, pupils educated in maintained mainstream schools and other LEA maintained pupils. The pupil data for pupils attending maintained nursery, primary, secondary and special schools are taken from the DfES Annual Schools census. Private voluntary and independent (PVI) under-5 pupil numbers are taken from the Early Years census but are only available since 1999–2000. Other LEA maintained pupils includes all pupils attending schools not maintained by the authority for whom the authority is paying full tuition fees, or educated otherwise than in schools and pupil referral units under arrangements made by the authority drawn from the form 8b submitted to the DfES. Also included as other LEA maintained pupils are all pupils attending pupil referral units who are not registered at a maintained mainstream school drawn from the DfES Annual Schools census. All pupil numbers are adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
⁽⁴⁷⁾ 1999–2000 saw a change in data source when the data collection moved from the RO1 form collected by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister to the section 52 form from the DfES. 2002–03 saw a further break in the time series following the introduction of Consistent Financial Reporting to schools.
⁽⁴⁸⁾ 2004–05 data is regarded as provisional and is subject to change by the LEA.

Date

22 November 2005

Reference

30653; 439 c1944-5W;439 c1945-6W

House

House of Commons

Regeneration (Wolverhampton)

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much has been spent by his Department on regeneration projects in (a) the City of Wolverhampton and (b) constituency of Wolverhampton South East since 1997.

Asked by

Pat McFadden (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

20 July 2005

For answer on

10 October 2005

Answered on

10 October 2005

Under the neighbourhood renewal fund, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) has provided funding totalling £37.1 million between 2001–02 and 2007–08 to tackle disadvantage in deprived neighbourhoods in Wolverhampton.English Partnerships is the national regeneration agency sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. English Partnership's expenditure in Wolverhampton in recent years has been in connection with Priority Sites Ltd, EP's commercial development joint venture with the Royal Bank of Scotland. Priority Sites expenditure began in 2002 and currently stands at £591,000. Under the former PIP (property investment programme), £2.6 million was spent between 1997 and 2001. English Partnerships provided a further £991,000 to Advantage West Midlands for land reclamation programme projects between 1997 and 2000. This makes EP's total spend in the city of Wolverhampton between 1997 to 2005 £4.2 million.A farther £628,225 in grants has been provided to Wolverhampton from 2001 to date as part of the neighbourhood and street crime warden schemes, both funded by ODPM.In addition, the Government awarded £53.5 million to the Wolverhampton new deal for communities partnership in 2001 under Round 2 of the Government's new deal for communities programme. The Partnership is now in year five of the 10-year programme and to date has spent approximately £10.3 million of the approved grant.Wolverhampton has also benefited from Objective 2 European regional development funds and since 1997 over £27.2 million has been spent directly in the city of Wolverhampton area.

Date

10 October 2005

Reference

15095; 437 c402W;437 c380W

House

House of Commons

Incapacity Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people in Wolverhampton South East constituency are in receipt of incapacity benefit.

Asked by

Pat McFadden (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Work and Pensions

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 July 2005

Reference

436 c1640W;436 c1641W; 10994

House

House of Commons

Pensioners/Benefits

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many state retirement pensioners there are in Wolverhampton, South-East; and what percentage this is of the total electorate in the constituency.

Asked by

Pat McFadden (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Work and Pensions

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

14 July 2005

Reference

10993; 436 c1277W;436 c1277W

House

House of Commons

Community Support Officers

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police community support officers there are in Wolverhampton; and how many there are in the constituencies of Wolverhampton (a) South East, (b) South West and (c) North East.

Asked by

Pat McFadden (Labour)

Answering body

Home Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

5 July 2005

Reference

436 c378W; 9081

House

House of Commons

Wolverhampton Education Action Zone Accounts for 1 April 2004 to 9 January 2005.

Type

House of Commons papers

Date

19 May 2005

Reference

HC 55 2005-06

House

House of Commons

Deposited Paper HINF 2005/680

Deposited by

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Deposited papers

Date

24 March 2005

Reference

HINF 2005/680

Dept for Education and Skills

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, if she will make a statement on the effects of the Sure Start programme in (a) Whitmore Reans and (b) Dunstall, Wolverhampton.

Asked by

Rob Marris (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Education and Skills

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

8 February 2005

For answer on

22 February 2005

Answered on

22 February 2005

Rob Marris: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will make a statement on the effects of the Sure Start programme in (a) Whitmore Reans and (b) Dunstall, Wolverhampton. [216227] Margaret Hodge: One Sure Start programme serves both the Whitmore Reans and Dunstall areas. It was approved in 2001 and supports around 870 young local children and their families. It delivers a wide range of services to support local families including family support in partnership with the Primary Care Trust (PCT); a support group for single parents; the provision of healthy eating advice to families, provision of safety equipment on a loan basis to families at a subsidised rate; a toy library; a cre¬che; play and stay as well as play groups; additional home visits by qualified midwife and health visitors and early assessment and referral for children with development delay. Since opening, this programme has helped to improve the quality of life for local families. For example it works closely with the smoking cessation programme run by the PCT and all staff have received training in ways to support parents and families who may want to give up smoking. All staff have been trained to be able to identify children with delayed language development and either apply strategies recommended by therapists or refer the families for specialist help. Local health visitors report back to the local programme on all women identified with post natal depression--so that support can be offered. Programme Monitoring shows that the programme has seen 700 of the 870 children in their catchment area since the programme opened (81 per cent.). The programme has strong parental participation both on the management board, which has six parent representatives with a parent vice chair and in activities where parents act as volunteers. It has a volunteer policy which aims to match skills gaps within the programme to the skills of the parents within the catchment area. This is used as a stepping stone to further training and ultimately employment. Volunteer parents can access all the training available to the programme staff.

Date

22 February 2005

Reference

216227; 431 c546W;431 c542W

House

House of Commons

Librarians' tools

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher