Skip to main content

1-20 of 39 results for subject:Methamphetamine

Year X
2006

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Draft SI on Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (amendment) (SI 2006/3331). Considered by Standing Committee. (Minutes of proceedings at UP 7 2005-06)

Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Notes
Research Sc 362.293,P
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
6th SC on DL
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, for her support and to the noble Lord, Lord Dholakia, for his. I am grateful, too, for the terms in which the noble Baroness in particular expressed her support. Clearly, there is an understanding across the political divide of the importance...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
686 c30-1GC
House
House of Lords

I support the order, which reclassifies methylamphetamine as a class A drug instead of the lower class B. It seems to us to be an appropriate measure, given the growing concern about the effect of the misuse of the drug, particularly in its crystalline form. The Minister was right to...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
686 c29-30GC
House
House of Lords

I support much of what the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, has said. We have no doubt on the basis of scientific and other evidence that methylamphetamine can, if misused, cause serious harm. However, there is a disagreement between the Minister’s remarks on classification and our position on it. We support...

Member
Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
686 c30GC
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that ithas considered the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2006 [35th Report from the Joint Committee]. The noble Lord said: The purpose of the order is to reclassify the substance methylamphetamine from a class B drug...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
686 c26-9GC
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (amendment) (SI 2006/3331). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Lead member
Lord Bassam of Brighton
Answering member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
686 c26-31GC
House
House of Lords

Whether the illegal manufacture of methamphetamine causes environmental and pollution problems; and, if so, what are those problems.

Asked by
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2006
Reference
684 c63WA; 6583
House
House of Lords

What was the incidence of illegal drug abuse in the United Kingdom using methamphetamine in each of the years 2001 to 2005; what is the addictive nature of this drug; and what is the incidence of recovery from such addiction.

Asked by
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
684 c44-5WA; 6581
House
House of Lords

What consultations they have had with authorities in the United States concerning the illegal drug methamphetamine; and whether they will introduce legislation to inhibit unlawful access to, and possession of, the component elements required to manufacture this drug.

Asked by
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
684 c33WA; 6582
House
House of Lords
Member
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Type
Ten minute rule bills
Date
9 May 2006
Reference
Bill 179 2005-06
House
House of Commons

I will not keep the House for long, but I have to comment on the farrago of nonsense that we have just heard. The hon. Member for Castle Point (Bob Spink) has a very old-fashioned view on this matter. Of course the Government cannot control the precursors of methylamphetamine, because...

Member
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2006
Reference
446 c175-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That leave be given to bring in a Bill to reclassify methylamphetamine as a category A drug." This is yet another sad tale of a failing Home Office. This time, it is failing to protect people from the misuse of crystal meth, which is seriously bad news...

Member
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2006
Reference
446 c173-5
House
House of Commons

Misuse of drugs (reclassification of methylamphetamine). Ten minute rule motion for leave to introduce a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and First reading (Bill 179 2005-06). To be read a second time 20 October

Lead member
Bob Spink
Type
Debates on bills
Date
9 May 2006
Reference
446 c173-6
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the impact of the misuse of methylamphetamine on (a) individuals and (b) levels of crime; and what assessment he has made of trends in abuse of the drug.

Asked by
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2006
Reference
49351; 444 c601W;444 c601W
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the drug classification system. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Cobbold
Answering member
Lord Bassam of Brighton
Department
Home Office
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
2 March 2006
Reference
679 c393-422
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I actually said that I did not enjoy smoking myself, but it was hard to be at a party at which someone was not smoking. It was the denial by only three Members of the House that they had ever been at a party which amused me. The rest of...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2006
Reference
679 c415
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we shall study that with interest and again I am grateful for the clarification. I had not meant to be so provocative at the outset of my speech. The views of the noble Lord, Lord Cobbold, are trenchant and well-known. It is fair to say that they do not coincide with...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2006
Reference
679 c415-21
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have participated in this fascinating debate. I am particularly grateful for the support that I received from the noble Lords, Lord Desai and Lord Mancroft, my noble friend Lady Murphy and the noble Earl, Lord Erroll, on the difficult issue of legalisation or prohibition. I was not surprised by the...

Member
Lord Cobbold (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2006
Reference
679 c422
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is helpful, further elucidation. Those contributions were telling, welcome and entertaining in their own way. I was also very impressed by the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, as I always am, for her invocation to the Government to become more scary in their campaign to frighten our younger generation about the dangers...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2006
Reference
679 c415
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may clarify one point. I do not agree with everything in the report of the noble Lord, Lord Birt. His comments that heroin consumption should be made a criminal offence is one with which I do not agree.

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2006
Reference
679 c415
House
House of Lords