Skip to main content

1-20 of 47 results for dept:"Ministry of Defence"

Year X
2008
Member X
Andrew Mackinlay

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More
Mackinlay, Andrew (47)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Tabled
Date
18 December 2008
Reference
246470
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 27 October 2008, Official Report, column 622W, on Afghanistan, what his reasons were for not stating which of Helmand's districts are under the control of the International Security Assistance Force, the Afghan National Security Forces and the...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c133-4W;483 c132-3W; 231822
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his objectives are for military action in Helmand province in (a) the next three months, (b) the next six months and (c) the next 12 months; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2008
Reference
482 c994W; 233669
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral answer to the hon. Member for Newport, West of 3 November 2008, Official Report, column 9, on Afghanistan, which eight districts in Helmand province under the control of NATO and the Afghanistan forces he referred to; and if...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 November 2008
Reference
482 c775W; 234124
House
House of Commons
I would never make such a base suggestion as that Ministers are evasive—but bewildered, they are. When I tabled a parliamentary question asking how many of the 13 districts of Helmand are controlled by NATO and the Afghan Government, the Minister’s reply referred to the ““presence”” of British troops. There is a world of difference between presence and having control. Which districts of Helmand are controlled by the Afghan Government and British or NATO forces, which are held and controlled by the Taliban, and which are indeterminate?
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2008
Reference
482 c10
House
House of Commons

In my recent discussions with a senior officer, the criticism I heard was not of the quality of equipment in the field; it was that there was insufficient equipment of that quality that people could be trained on back home—that was the big deficiency. He said that troops go from...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2008
Reference
481 c1077
House
House of Commons

In fairness to the Secretary of State, that is a matter of foreign policy. However, we are entitled to know in a defence debate what the military situation is. I fully acknowledge that in large tracts of Afghanistan there is relative stability and normal life—to the extent that there is...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2008
Reference
481 c1091-2
House
House of Commons

This is in no way to agree with the conduct of Russia, but some of us were bewildered in the summer by the cosy consensus between the Government and the Opposition in persisting with the concept that Georgia could come into NATO without that prejudicing article 5 of the NATO...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2008
Reference
481 c1087
House
House of Commons

I will be swift in view of the time restrictions, but I would like to raise one point of a historic nature before I move on to Helmand and other contemporary issues. I have to express some disappointment that the Government did not do more to commemorate the 90th anniversary...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2008
Reference
481 c1089-90
House
House of Commons

I am obliged to the hon. Gentleman. I asked Ministers, in fairly temperate terms, to clarify the position so that we can reassure people or explain the problems. If there are impediments, can they be overcome? I will talk about Afghanistan and Helmand province shortly. I know that other hon....

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2008
Reference
481 c1090-1
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which districts of Helmand Province are deemed to be (a) under UK, ISAF and NATO forces or the Afghan government control, (b) under Taliban control and (c) in indeterminate control; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c622W; 227374
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will direct the relevant authorities to investigate the claim made by Wouter Basson during his trial in South Africa in July 2000 that he was able to purchase defence software developed in the UK through colleagues at...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 October 2008
Reference
481 c99W; 227352
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what account his Department has taken in its formulation of policy on training of the summing-up remarks of Mr. Justice Royce of Winchester Crown Court before the acquittal of Provost Sergeant Russell Price, Sergeant Paul Blake and Corporal John Edwards on 31...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 October 2008
Reference
481 c126W; 227404
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many deaths of UK armed forces personnel in (a) Iraq and (b) Afghanistan are considered to have resulted from the use of technology, explosives, ordnance or other weapons whose provenance is believed to be Iranian; and if he will make a...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
480 c1017W;480 c1011W; 225085
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when and for what purpose South Africa's Surgeon-General, Niel Knobel, visited Porton Down; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
480 c1017W;480 c1011W; 225084
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reasons his Department has not written to the hon. Member for Thurrock with details of the plans to commemorate the 90th anniversary of the First World War's armistice on 11 November 2008; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2008
Reference
480 c717-8W;480 c711-2W; 225397
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what reports he has received on the practice of beasting in the Royal Welsh Regiment; which senior officers (a) have been admonished and (b) are the subject of disciplinary action arising from the practice of beasting in the regiment since 3 July...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 October 2008
Reference
223905; 480 c244W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on how many occasions his Department has instructed the Treasury Solicitor to seek leave to appeal to the House of Lords from (a) the Court of Appeal and (b) the House of Lords itself in each of the last 10 years; and...

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 September 2008
Reference
220820; 479 c1449W
House
House of Commons
May I refer the Secretary of State to the parliamentary question that I tabled on 13 November 2007 asking what his Department intended to do to commemorate the rather special 90th anniversary this year of the armistice? The Secretary of State, his Minister of State and the junior Minister have always promised to write to me, but we are now about to go on parliamentary recess. They do not only need to write to me—they need to tell the world what we are going to do. Will they make a statement to tell us how we are going to mark this very important social, political, military and legal anniversary, in which many schoolchildren, students and veterans are very interested?
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2008
Reference
479 c526
House
House of Commons
If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Notes
Question not printed
Date
21 July 2008
Reference
479 c526; 219840
House
House of Commons