Skip to main content

1-20 of 83 results for member:"Lord Hannay of Chiswick"

Year X
2008

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, does the Minister recognise that the Statement made only the most fleeting reference to regional security? Now that the withdrawal of combat troops—by both the UK and the United States, and by others—is operating within a finite timetable, would she not agree that the Government should really put...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2008
Reference
706 c960-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Leader of the House not agree that the Opposition’s reaction to what was decided on Ireland is rather a case of looking a gift horse in the mouth? Are not some of the assurances and clarifications offered to the Irish of considerable benefit to ourselves? Are...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2008
Reference
706 c669
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for making possible this debate, for his useful contribution in opening it and for all the work that he has done in recent weeks to deal with this pretty terrible situation. Surely no country in the world epitomises more accurately the old Irish...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 November 2008
Reference
705 c1459-62
House
House of Lords

Like other noble Lords in this short debate—and I pay tribute to my noble friend Lord Luce for having made it possible—I consider the Government’s original decision to exclude from the future scope of the Commonwealth scholarship scheme citizens from countries which used to be called the ““old Commonwealth”” to...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c107-8GC
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the noble Baroness accept my declaration of interest, as having made representations to the noble Lord, Lord Malloch-Brown, on this matter some weeks ago in favour of a more proactive response, which the Government have now taken, no doubt purely coincidentally? Can the noble Baroness reinforce the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Lee, that Somalia is an example of a place that has come far too low down the list of international priorities for far too long? During all that time, it has been nothing but a growing source of instability and mayhem in the Horn of Africa. Is it not time for the Government, as a permanent member of the Security Council, to promote a little more proactively, like the good work that it is doing on piracy, a process that leads to stabilisation of that country?
Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 November 2008
Reference
705 c217
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister not agree that the present situation in the eastern region of the DRC is a clear-cut case of the international community’s responsibility to protect the civilian population, given that the DRC is not able to do so itself and that the sensitive problem of consent does not arise? Does he not also agree that recent events have shown the need for a large peacekeeping mission such as MONUC to have either its own rapid reaction capability or a multinational back-up force to deal with emergencies such as have now arisen?
Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2008
Reference
705 c9
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
20 October 2008
Reference
704 c938
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister recognise that one of the great merits of the 2003 strategy was that it identified enlargement of the European Union as an absolutely key part of its future security? That was, of course, before the countries in central, eastern and southern Europe joined. Does he agree that it is now very important that the review that is under way emphasises that further enlargement continues to be an integral part of Europe’s security and needs to be given full prominence in the reviewed policy?
Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 October 2008
Reference
704 c943
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I believe the Minister agrees that the tone of all three statements from the Front Benches in this House are among the most positive that we have heard after a European Council for a very long time. That is to be welcomed. Long may it continue. The noble...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2008
Reference
704 c963-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not adopting a cavalier approach to anyone, least of all, unlike the movers of this Motion, to the European Parliament.

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c671
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister not agree that the failure of the Russians to fulfil the agreement of 8 September, which he has confirmed they have not done by not withdrawing to the positions they held in early August, must be a germane factor for the European Union in deciding whether to resume negotiations on a policy co-operation agreement? Will he accept my support for what appears to have been the Foreign Secretary’s position in the Council yesterday, saying that the time was not yet ready for that?
Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c597
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would like to address a couple of points raised by this Prayer. First, is it reasonably justified for the European Parliament to have taken the view, and to have persuaded the member states of that view, that the dual mandate is incompatible with an effective European Parliament?...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c670-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall only make three points in this necessarily short but timely debate. First, it must surely be a high priority for the European Union to ensure that the incoming US Administration really throw their weight behind the negotiation of a comprehensive package to bring a durable peace...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2008
Reference
704 c566-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree that the Statement indicates how far we are from cracking the problem of Iraq’s neighbours? Critical comments about Syria and Iran are undoubtedly well deserved, and problems continue on the northern frontier with Turkey. Does this not demonstrate that we will never have a...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2008
Reference
703 c1685
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does not the noble Lord agree that it is very important that it be made clear that this International Criminal Court administers justice in an even-handed way? The extension of responsibility to Sudan by the Security Council some years ago applies to the insurgents, just as it applies to the Government. If the insurgents commit crimes against humanity or grave breaches of international humanitarian law, they too will be pursued by the court, as was the case in the former Yugoslavia, where some members of all three groups were eventually brought before the court. It is rather important that that be so. It should not be thought that the court is a mechanism for pursuing just the Government.
Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1099-100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Leader of the House say a few words about views on the size of this gathering? I refer to the number of countries represented at the meeting, not the number of people who attend, to which the noble Lord, Lord McNally referred. Has not the time...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2008
Reference
703 c862
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for that Answer, which would undoubtedly have done credit to the oracle at Delphi. Will he comment on the undesirability, rather soon after the ending of the Cold War, of systematising the divide in the world between democratic sheep and undemocratic goats, and on whether any of the large democracies of the developing world, such as India, Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa, are joining up for this journey? Does he agree that it would be better for this subject to be given a full airing this year rather than to find ourselves next year facing an American president who thought that it was a good idea?
Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c1329
House
House of Lords
What is their assessment of proposals to establish a league of democracies composed of all democratically ruled countries.
Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c1329
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if I understand it, by his own admission the noble Lord is giving us the speech that he should have given us last week when he was not in his place to give it. Now he is abusing the procedures of this House and giving us a speech...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1075
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment seems extremely injudicious and to cut absolutely across almost the sole point on which everyone agreed in our long debate earlier—that the Irish were not to be bullied, subjected to fait accompli, pushed into a minority of one and subjected to pressure. Yet, if it were...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1086
House
House of Lords