Skip to main content

1-20 of 637 results for subject:"National parks"

Year X
2008

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am most grateful to my hon. Friend, who is making a powerful speech in defence of his constituents. If I understood him correctly, he is saying that if the bogs are allowed to develop, there will be a risk of landslip. We saw in Boscastle the terrible tragedy that...

Member
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c49WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has spoken eloquently on that situation many times in the House. We have discussed at great length how moors and uplands should be run. I thank him for his support. He is absolutely right. I know that he is concerned that the Environment Agency and bodies such...

Member
Ian Liddell-Grainger (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c49-50WH
House
House of Commons

It is good to serve under your chairmanship, Mr. Martlew. I am grateful for the opportunity to debate this subject and in particular to talk about my local national park. This short debate could not be more topical. About an hour ago, the elders of Exmoor national park began a...

Member
Ian Liddell-Grainger (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c46-9WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister. I am really pleased that he has just announced that the increase for grant funding to Exmoor will go up to the level that he mentioned. That good news will be gratefully received on Exmoor and I thank the Government and the Minister for it.

Member
Ian Liddell-Grainger (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c51WH
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to respond to this debate. I congratulate the hon. Member for Bridgwater (Mr. Liddell-Grainger) on securing this important debate. It could not be more timely, as he said. He began by mentioning the novels of Thomas Hardy. At some point, we will probably exchange notes. My favourite...

Member
Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c50-1WH
House
House of Commons

I understand the point that the hon. Gentleman makes on behalf of his constituents. However, it would not be for the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to intervene directly in this matter. Nevertheless, the hon. Gentleman makes the valid point that we must ensure that there...

Member
Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c53WH
House
House of Commons

I do not disagree with any of that. The problem is quite simple, that the pressure on local schools, shops, pubs and services in Exmoor is now acute because the population is getting older and older, local people cannot afford to buy and there is no chance of local houses...

Member
Ian Liddell-Grainger (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c52-3WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that helpful intervention. It is certainly important that that increase in funding is well used. As I said, I will turn to the issue of Blackpitts. As the hon. Gentleman has already mentioned, the national park authority acted within its powers in acquiring the...

Member
Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c51-2WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on national parks in England.

Lead member
Ian Liddell-Grainger
Answering member
Huw Irranca-Davies
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
16 December 2008
Reference
485 c46-53WH
House
House of Commons

asked Her Majesty's Government:What will be the process and timetable for deciding any changes to existing national park boundaries following the forthcoming designation of the South Downs National Park.

Asked by
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 2008
Reference
705 c323WA; 6316
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 24/11/2008 from Baroness Andrews to Lord Greaves regarding various issues arising from the Third Reading debate on the Planning Bill. 33 p.

Deposited by
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
DEP2008-2868
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 2: 2: Clause 12, page 7, line 17, leave out from ““statement”” to ““or”” in line 18 and insert ““is a pre-commencement statement”” The noble Baroness said: My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendments Nos. 3 to 6. This is a group of minor and technical...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1015
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, for interpreting and speaking to my amendment, which I shall say nothing more about. I will answer quite a lot of the questions asked by my noble friend Lord Howarth by referring to the letter which my noble friend Lord Hunt...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1025-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble and learned Lord is misreading the amendment. The words, "““During the period of 60 days””," in subsection (3) cover both paragraphs (a) and (b). Subsection (b) states that, "““the Secretary of State must respond””." The circumstances postulated by the noble and learned Lord, frankly, lack credibility....

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1065
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I did not support the Government in the Lobbies on the vote last week. Although I was in the building, I absented myself from the vote. That was because I am a member of the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee, which had reached a clear view on...

Member
Lord Boyd of Duncansby (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1064
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 209 [Charities]:

Member
Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1040
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my thanks to the Minister for the trouble she has taken, the letters she has written and the way she has tried to reach a solution on this rather tricky issue. In her letter she refers to the question of ““purpose”” or ““purposes”” which we discussed...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1043-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the only amendment on CIL, and I support my noble friend in what he said. It gives me the only opportunity to ask the Minister a couple of questions about CIL. I am certainly not happy with the way that the Bill is at the moment,...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1034
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 21: 21: Clause 209, page 121, line 39, leave out ““(1) or”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I took the amendment proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Shutt, which we have just voted on, as being the front-line position and perhaps even as being in no...

Member
Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1058
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 7: 7: Clause 25, page 17, line 19, at end insert ““or a mainline railway between England and Scotland linking major population centres”” The noble Duke said: My Lords, I will speak also to Amendment No. 29, which is consequential on Amendment No. 7. I thank the...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1015-17
House
House of Lords