Skip to main content

1-20 of 93 results for subject:Separation

Year X
2009

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many members of (a) the Army, (b) the Royal Navy, and (c) the Royal Air Force have changed from married status into marital category (1) decree absolute, (2) separated, and (3) annulled, in each year since 2000; what proportion of each service's strength this...

Asked by
Lord Lee of Trafford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
5780; 714 c31-2WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord West of Spithead on 20 April (WA 377), how many marriages subsequently failed during the probationary period; how many of those married couples had children born in the United Kingdom; and how many spouses were sent back to...

Asked by
Lord King of West Bromwich (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 May 2009
Reference
2993; 710 c143WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what research has been conducted into links between drug addiction among young people and family disintegration.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
3022; 710 c92WA
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness, Lady Deech, should do justice to herself. She knows perfectly well that the reason why she is seeking to delete the paragraph on prohibited relationships is because she wishes it not to be confined to a sexual relationship. She is under no doubt that the Bill is...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c425
House
House of Lords

I, too, have the greatest possible sympathy with the amendment and with the noble Baroness in her promotion of it, but I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Henley, that this is a matter that ought to be in a government Bill at some stage. As the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c426
House
House of Lords

How would the noble Baroness answer the question about whether her amendment would drive a coach and horses through taxation law? The noble Baroness may not believe that inheritance tax should exist but I happen to believe very strongly that it should exist because of the distortions created within society...

Member
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c423
House
House of Lords

If I might respectfully say so, I think it should be Amendment 4.

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c421
House
House of Lords

I think therefore that procedurally the right thing for me to do now is to move Amendment 1. I beg to move. Amendment 1 agreed.

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c421
House
House of Lords

Before I come to the amendment, perhaps I should declare an interest as a cohabitee. That is not entirely of my choosing, as I have asked the lady in my life on several occasions to change the situation. To date, my blandishments have not been successful, but mutual friends have...

Member
Lord Brett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c420-1
House
House of Lords

The right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Winchester, who sadly cannot be present this evening, spoke at Second Reading of being a critical friend of this Bill. The result is that these Benches can support some of the amendments, but not others. I apologise that I shall shortly have to...

Member
Bishop of Southwark (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c420
House
House of Lords

In that case, I will speak on Amendment 1, which I strongly support. I notice that, although the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, said that it would be preferable if it was 10 years, no one has put that proposal forward. We are dealing with five years and, so far, as...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c418-20
House
House of Lords

Amendment 2 2: Clause 2, page 2, line 7, leave out paragraph (b)

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c421
House
House of Lords

It appears to me as though it would be appropriate for me to speak on Amendment 1 and allow Amendment 1 to be completed. Then I will move Amendment 4, if that is right.

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c418
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful for the repeated promotion of my status in the peerage, but I assure the noble Lord, Lord Lester, that I am a mere Baron like him, and I have not risen to the dizzy heights of a Viscount. Before the noble Baroness, Lady Farrington, intervenes, it...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c417
House
House of Lords

I did move the first amendment. Amendment 4 is grouped with Amendment 1.

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c417
House
House of Lords

I have a feeling that Amendment 4 is in my name. I should like to respond on Amendment 1 and then move Amendment 4, if that is thought to be appropriate.

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c418
House
House of Lords

Shall we leave it to the noble Lord, Lord Lester, to say whatever he wants to? It might be that the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss, wishes to speak.

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c418
House
House of Lords

I may have slightly confused the Committee. I was trying to make it clear that we are talking to Amendment 1, but I will not feel that I am bound by the convention on groupings, whereby if the first amendment in a group is accepted, one then accepts that the...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c418
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Viscount sits down, may I ask for his help? He interrupted my opening speech, and I apologise if there was any impoliteness. Amendment 4 is grouped with Amendment 1, and I have not yet spoken to it. Would it be for the convenience of the Committee if...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c417
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her helpful intervention. I wish to explain that by saying some of these things now we will save time on later amendments. In essence I want to say that five years is quite short enough and that Amendment 4 would simply open the door...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2009
Reference
710 c415-6
House
House of Lords