Skip to main content

1-20 of 435 results for subject:Utilities

Year X
2009

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change if his Department will take steps to require energy utility companies to put in place resilience measures sufficient to prevent cyber-attacks rendering their services temporarily ineffective.

Asked by
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2009
Reference
502 c1340W; 303798
House
House of Commons
Type
Impact assessments
Date
15 December 2009
Reference
RIA 09/196

Not only despicable but wrong, as modern wind turbines, especially the larger ones that avoid providing perches for birds, have turned out to be perfectly safe for most bird life. Such an ill-informed attack on wind power is exactly the kind of thing that we should reject. The Conservatives' support...

Member
Martin Horwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c112-3
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend the Member for Sherwood (Paddy Tipping) referred to the sectors that are currently not covered by the social tariff. My right hon. Friend said that the issue would be debated in Committee, but would he like to comment now on the fact that although approximately 4 million-plus...

Member
Nick Ainger (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c48
House
House of Commons

We do need more gas storage, and the hon. Lady, as a member of the Select Committee, has expertise in these matters. The reason why we are worried about the proposal that she recommends—we will shortly respond to the recommendations of the Wicks review, which looked at some of these...

Member
Ed Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c46-7
House
House of Commons

What will be done is a matter for extensive consultation, when the hon. Gentleman will have an opportunity to make those points. I offer that suggestion as a way out of the dilemma that hon. Members mentioned. I was asked about clause 14 by the hon. Member for North Southwark...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c120-1
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has a long track record of following the subject of fuel poverty, and he is exactly right. I look forward to a more detailed discussion about how to tackle that problem. As I have said, we need to set social tariffs in a wider context. The Warm...

Member
Paddy Tipping (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c62
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman talks about acting on the evidence of the science, but he knows that in the case of Heathrow airport, involving an important decision that will affect the environment, the only costed emissions were those of outgoing flights, not of incoming ones. How can he be serious...

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c42
House
House of Commons

I will not, because I am keen to ensure that the Minister of State has plenty of time to respond. We need to do more to secure that investment, and the Bill simply will not do it. Those who are looking to invest in nuclear power need much more certainty...

Member
Charles Hendry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c117
House
House of Commons

I am so grateful, Mr. Speaker. The hon. Member for Tunbridge Wells spoke of the UK falling behind in the race to build CCS. That could not be further from the truth. A number of other hon. Members, including the hon. Member for Angus (Mr. Weir), mentioned China, but no...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c119
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the hon. Gentleman's contribution to the Liberal Democrat policy debate, but is he aware that no nuclear power station has ever been built on time and to budget and that we are still paying between £1 billion and £2 billion to clean up the last generation...

Member
Martin Horwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c85
House
House of Commons

That is an interesting question, but I do not think it matters. The provision states quite clearly that sustainability is a primary part of Ofgem's responsibility and, of course, it is a consumer benefit. Fighting climate change is as much a consumer benefit as anything else. In fact, I think...

Member
Desmond Turner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c84
House
House of Commons

Energy Bill. Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on proceedings in Committee, on Report, 3R and any other proceedings. Agreed to on question. Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution. Agreed to on question. Ways and means resolution. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Ed Miliband
Answering member
Greg Clark
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Debates on bills
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c41-123
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend as surprised as I am that Conservative policy on the energy gap still seems to be to sit on the fence about nuclear and say, "If we need a nuclear power station, we'll just pop down to the supermarket and get one"? That is a crazy...

Member
Rob Marris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c119
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right, but perhaps the most remarkable thing the hon. Member for Tunbridge Wells said was that he is entirely relaxed about the shadow Business Secretary's comments about wind turbines. It is quite clear that the Conservatives do not want the new generation capacity that we...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c119-20
House
House of Commons

The Minister has a long history of opposing nuclear power. What caused her to change her mind?

Member
Anne Main (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c120
House
House of Commons

May I correct the hon. Lady? I have a long history of leading a campaign against nuclear weapons. The hon. Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes) said that he wanted to see more ambition in the Bill, although he welcomed many aspects of it, and we are grateful...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c120
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. One would have thought they would have done so, but it appears they have not. The hon. Member for Tunbridge Wells spoke about how vital an emissions performance standard is and again said that such a measure was not in the Bill. The fact is...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c118-9
House
House of Commons

Is it not the case that the sum involved would be £6,500 times 20 million or so, so we are talking about £160 billion—a figure not unadjacent to 10 per cent. of gross domestic product? Surely the official Opposition must have thought in more detail about how they can fund...

Member
David Leslie Taylor (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c118
House
House of Commons

Combating climate change while maintaining secure and affordable energy supplies is one the greatest challenges that our Government face. This is a landmark year in the fight against climate change and today, as many contributors have said, is the start of the discussions at Copenhagen. The world has come together...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c117-8
House
House of Commons