Skip to main content

1-20 of 248 results for subject:"Legislative process"

Year X
2010

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That it be an instruction to the Committee of the Whole House to which the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill has been committed that they divide the Bill in two so as to separate the provisions relating to the parliamentary voting system from those relating to constituencies.

Member
Baroness McDonagh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1373
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I know and fully acknowledge that this is not the other place, but I am slightly alarmed by the sort of threats being made by the noble Lord opposite. When this House comes to deliberate on House of Lords reform, it will do so in due course and...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1376
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise just to respond to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer of Thoroton—it is a brief point. Life is always difficult in opposition, particularly when one has been in government for so long. I underwent 13 years of opposition and recall that I could have resorted...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1377
House
House of Lords

My Lord, my point is that, if it is held together as one Bill, it can. So the noble Lord is supporting my position. However, if it is separated into two Bills, then, by definition, and, indeed, because of the way in which this has been presented, it is clear...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1375-6
House
House of Lords

I understand precisely what the noble Baroness is saying and I understand that that will be the role of your Lordships’ House. All that I am saying is that we have to be extraordinarily careful with this measure which, after all, deals entirely with the other place. It is not...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1376
House
House of Lords

I think it would be helpful if I set out the Front Bench’s position. Our position is that it would be a good thing to split the Bill. At the end of last week, I believed that the Motion would have the effect of splitting the Bill. Further constructive discussions...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1377
House
House of Lords

I remind noble Lords that your Lordships’ Constitution Committee, of which I am a member, reported to the House earlier this month that it understood the need for urgency in relation to Part 1 of the Bill, which concerns the proposed referendum. However, it suggested that the case for proceeding...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1374-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a former General Secretary of the Labour Party and also, like many people of all political persuasions in this House and none, I have been a lifelong grass-roots community campaigner, passionate about how democracy works in our communities. That is why I was...

Member
Baroness McDonagh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1373-4
House
House of Lords

Why does the noble Lord aver that this Bill, if properly considered, could not be implemented in time for the next election? It is absurd.

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1375
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I follow the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, with some trepidation because he always speaks with great authority, as those who have often appeared in court appear to do in your Lordships’ House. There is a wider issue here that your Lordships’ House needs to address. I am absolutely...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1375
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Leader of the House accept that he is wrong in one of the assertions he makes? Many parliamentary constituency boundaries were changed in 2005—my previous one in particular.

Member
Baroness Corston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1380
House
House of Lords

All of them may not be out of date, but many are. We are going to put that fundamental unfairness right. Surely the noble Lords opposite are not supporting the continuation of unfairness. A couple of weeks ago this House gave the Bill a Second Reading. I believe that, in...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1380-1
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords who have spoken, and I would like to refer to a couple of the points. I say to noble Lords opposite that the Motion would not discard Part 2 of the Bill and that every bit of work done up to now would remain. It...

Member
Baroness McDonagh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1381
House
House of Lords

No, please—I did not want to tempt the noble Baroness to her feet for more outrage. Noble Lords opposite also sought to progress that legislation with unseemly haste. Was that politically expedient? I cannot possibly guess their original motive. So it is somewhat surprising to hear it suggested today that...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1380
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are in danger of having a rerun of Second Reading: let us not to do that. I thank the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer of Thoroton, for what he said. I completely agree with much, although not all, of it. He spotted that the Motion before...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1379-80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, effectively accuses this side of the House of procedural malpractice, he might care to consider that the coalition is introducing radical proposals for constitutional reform without any authority to do so from the electors. He might also care to consider that the...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1379
House
House of Lords

Let me make clear our position: we are not supporting the Motion. So perhaps this avuncular chat could be postponed to another occasion.

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1377
House
House of Lords

I want to know who is the uncle. All I will say is that we have suddenly begun to embark on a number of procedural debates. That is all well and good, and it is part of the tradition of the House that we should do so. However, I question...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1377-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I take issue with the assumption of the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, that the House of Lords is not, as part of its responsibility, a guardian for the proprieties of passing legislation. It will not do for him to suggest that when we seek to establish whether a...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1378
House
House of Lords

I am surprised that neither the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Wirral, nor the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, referred to the big change that will be made in the process and procedure for determining constituencies. I do not declare an interest because at the moment I do not have a...

Member
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1378-9
House
House of Lords