Skip to main content

1-20 of 533 results for subject:Technology

Year X
2010

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The coalition's programme for government made a commitment to consider implementation of the Dyson review. The Government's growth review will be one of the main mechanisms for taking forward the Dyson review's aim of making the UK the leading high-tech exporter in Europe. The Treasury is currently consulting on the support that research and development tax credits provide for innovation, as part of wider corporate tax reforms.
Answered by
David Gauke (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
520 c1308
House
House of Commons
We continue to look at technology and innovation centres, and we need to do so in the context of what we already have in the UK, such as our science capabilities and industries. We need to take advantage of the commercial opportunities that they provide. I note my hon. Friend's comments, and we continue to consider the matter.
Answered by
David Gauke (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
520 c1308-9
House
House of Commons
I take on board my hon. Friend's comment, and we are determined to ensure that we do everything we can to help jobs and revenue. That is why we have been able to reduce the corporation tax rate from 28 to 24% over four years, and we are putting in place a stable and predictable tax system. I note his comments, and as I said, there is a review of the matter.
Answered by
David Gauke (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
520 c1308
House
House of Commons
What plans he has to implement the recommendations of the Dyson report on new technology.
Asked by
Dominic Raab (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
31825; 520 c1308
House
House of Commons
The Dyson report followed the work done by Hermann Hauser, and one of their recommendations is the creation of technology innovation centres, for which the Government correctly set aside some money in the comprehensive spending review. However, all the commentators who have passed judgment on the matter have said that the £200 million allocated, although welcome, will not go terribly far. What assessment has the Minister made of the long-term need to keep that funding stream alive, and is there a long-term plan to increase it substantially?
Asked by
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
520 c1308-9
House
House of Commons
I welcome that response. The Dyson report recommended tax credits for high-tech start-ups, including businesses such as Chelsea Technologies and TR Control Solutions in my constituency, which create new jobs by pioneering green technology. Can the Minister be encouraged to go one step further and introduce tax breaks to stimulate that niche area of the UK economy, which is good for jobs, revenue and the environment?
Asked by
Dominic Raab (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 December 2010
Reference
520 c1308
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills what (a) crtieria and (b) timescale he has set for assessing the effects of the proposed East End of London HighTech Hub in terms of (i) jobs created, (ii) level of exports and (iii) other factors.

Asked by
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2010
Reference
29175; 520 c1043W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
16 December 2010
Reference
HC 228 2010-11
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills what responsibilities his Department has for the development of technical standards for industry; and in which fora of technical standards development his Department participates.

Asked by
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 December 2010
Reference
30337; 520 c805W
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 10/12/2010 from Mark Prisk MP to Adrian Bailey MP regarding advanced manufacturing growth review. Inc 3 docs.

Deposited by
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Deposited papers
Date
13 December 2010
Reference
DEP2010-2250
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 13/12/2010 from Gregory Barker MP to Tim Yeo MP, Chair of the Energy and Climate Change Committee, regarding the microgeneration strategy consultation. Includes consultation paper. 61 p.

Deposited by
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Consultation papers; Deposited papers
Date
13 December 2010
Reference
DEP2011-0051
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what steps his Department is taking to increase the number of (a) specialist technology teachers and (b) primary class teachers with technology training.

Asked by
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 November 2010
Reference
24172; 519 c545W
House
House of Commons

Table showing Scientific advisory committees currently advising the Government sources; information on or explanations of their function, and the descriptor of any proposed reform. 12 p.

Deposited by
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Deposited papers
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
DEP2010-2095
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills how much funding his Department plans to allocate to support the proposed East End of London High Tech Hub in each of the next four years.

Asked by
Gordon Banks (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
23599; 519 c408-9W
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on traffic congestion at the Dartford crossing.

Lead member
Gareth Johnson
Answering member
Mike Penning
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
23 November 2010
Reference
519 c68-76WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that intervention. In principle, I accept that there should be a further crossing over the Thames. The big issue is, of course, where that crossing should be. It is a classic case of nimbyism. I do not think anyone here would hold their hand up and...

Member
Gareth Johnson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2010
Reference
519 c69-70WH
House
House of Commons

My understanding is that by introducing free-flow technology, of course, there would be an increase in capacity on the crossing. However, that would give only a one-off increase of approximately 20%. In recent years, the volume of traffic using the crossing has increased exponentially. Does my hon. Friend agree that...

Member
Jackie Doyle-Price (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2010
Reference
519 c69WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure and an honour to serve under your chairmanship for the first time, Mr Rosindell. What an ironic coincidence it is that you are chairing a debate on a matter that is so important in your constituency, a part of the world that I know well. I...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2010
Reference
519 c71-4WH
House
House of Commons

Bexley residents are much closer to the bridge and the tunnel than many others, but they do not have a discount scheme. Will they be included in the Minister's thoughts?

Member
David Evennett (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2010
Reference
519 c74WH
House
House of Commons

They are certainly included in my thoughts—my hon. Friend uses a good piece of terminology. I am more than willing to look at that, but if I take the discount away from some and give it to others, I will get just as many complaints from the other side. I...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2010
Reference
519 c75WH
House
House of Commons