Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,010 results for subject:Databases

Year X
2011

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I wonder whether others felt, as I did, that what the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, just said was music to the ears. Of the amendments currently tabled to this Bill, I regard this amendment as by far and away the most important, and it is one that I...

Member
Baroness Mallalieu (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1695-6
House
House of Lords

I do not mean to prolong the noble Lord’s speech by my interruption, but perhaps I could suggest that it is not helpful to his case if he becomes narrowly partisan. This is not an area where any one party can claim a monopoly of virtue or vice. It is...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1693
House
House of Lords

I do not think the noble Lord has grasped what I was saying. The amendment states, "““in accordance with this Part””," but we have not determined what this Part will cover. As the noble Lord realises, I have put down many amendments to Part 1 in an attempt to rejig...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1720
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the noble Lord would outline what is meant by, "““in accordance with this Part””."

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1719
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a lengthy debate that has touched on a large number of very important issues. In responding, perhaps I may briefly take the attention of the Committee back to what we are debating: the terms of Amendment 1. With all due respect to the Minister, I...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1719
House
House of Lords

Does my noble friend at least accept that we legislate vastly more than any free democracy in the western world? We have between 200 per cent and 400 per cent more statute law than any free state that I have yet discovered.

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1715
House
House of Lords

My Lords, 43 years ago, I was a Home Office Minister but I doubt very much whether the procedures that have been so dramatically described by the noble Baroness were current in those days. I rise to support wholeheartedly this amendment and to salute the courageous and most splendid speech...

Member
Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1696-7
House
House of Lords

I hope to be able to do that. I hope that I have not been unduly partisan, but we all feel strongly on this issue and I very much hope that noble Lords on the Liberal Democrat Benches, who I understand feel strongly on the issue, will explain their case...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1693
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment. As the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, explained, the current drafting is a change from the wording of the Access to Justice Act 1999 and the amendment makes it clear that the Lord Chancellor has an obligation to secure the access to legal services that...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1688-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Constitution Committee did us, as it always does, a good service in reminding us and stating emphatically that access to justice is a constitutional principle. The amendment that it proposed to Clause 1, which would say that the Lord Chancellor must secure that legal aid is made...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1689-92
House
House of Lords

My Lords, speaking as a liberal from the Liberal Democrat Benches, it is with regret that I say that I support the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Pannick. I support it with regret because I had hoped that we would not be in this position by...

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1693-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I briefly support the amendment by echoing the words that have already been quoted—those of the Lord Chancellor, who said: "““access to justice is a hallmark of a civilised society””,—[Official Report, Commons, 15/11/10; col. 659.]" and those of my noble friend Lord Pannick, who has said repeatedly that...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1694-5
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I could ask the noble Lord a question. I listened with great care to what he said. It would be extremely helpful to know where his argument is directed. Is it intended to support or oppose Amendment 1?

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1693
House
House of Lords

I will come to that in a second. The noble and learned Baroness will be pleased to know that I am about to wind up. We should all be grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, for tabling an amendment that challenges us to debate the principles against which the...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1693
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1697
House
House of Lords

I rise to support this amendment for reasons which I will explain—

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1697
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is the turn of this side, but I wait with pleasure to hear what the noble and learned Lord has to say. When I started my career as a barrister in the late 1950s, we had started with legal aid for only a few years. Up until...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1697-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad that the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, went before me, because I can wholeheartedly agree with the last sentiment that he has expressed—I am not surprised that we share that view. Before I speak about my hesitation in respect of the amendment, I should declare, because...

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1698-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Goldsmith, was born in inner-city Liverpool. I had the privilege of representing part of that city for 25 years, first as a city councillor and later, as the noble Lord, Lord McNally, knows, as a Member of the House of Commons. Liverpool...

Member
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1699-700
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is probably my turn, if my noble former constituent will allow me. I have been stimulated, not for the first time and I hope not for the last, by some of the speeches in this debate. First, the noble Baroness, Lady Mallalieu, reminded me of how grateful...

Member
Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
733 c1700-1
House
House of Lords