1-20 of 727 results for subject:Injuries
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.253 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Injuries
- We searched for
- subject_t:Injuries OR subject_t:Trauma OR subject_ses:91671
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much his Department has contributed to assist injured service personnel with care and rehabilitation in (a) 2010-11, (b) 2011-12 and (c) 2012-13 to date.
[133989]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much his Department has contributed to assist injured service personnel with care and rehabilitation in (a) 2010-11, (b) 2011-12 and (c) 2012-13 to date.
[133989]
The Ministry of Defence provides a broad range of medical care, treatment and rehabilitation services delivered through a combination of military and contracted (with the NHS and private sectors) medical capabilities. The aim is to provide entitled armed forces personnel who have been injured (e.g. on operations, exercises/training etc) with world class treatment and rehabilitation that best meets the medical needs of the service person and the occupational needs of their service.
The Department spend by financial years for the care and rehabilitation of injured service personnel is shown in the following table:
| Financial
year | £
million |
| 2010-11 | 101.277 |
| 2011-12 | 108.873 |
| 2012-13
to end of November
2012 | 63.491 |
The figures above cover the following elements of care provision and are based on audited costs for FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12 and estimated costs for FY 2012-13:
Acute medical care at The Royal Centre for Defence Medicine
Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre Headley Court—including complex trauma rehabilitation and neurological rehabilitation
Regional rehabilitation units.
Other facilities also treat and rehabilitate injured personnel, but it is not possible, without incurring disproportionate cost, to break down the costs for treating injured personnel with other episodes of care that do not relate to injuries.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many injuries have been sustained by young people following an incident of restraint, in each young offender institution and secure training centre in each month since January 2010; and how many of those injuries have been classified as minor or serious...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many injuries have been sustained by young people following an incident of restraint, in each young offender institution and secure training centre in each month since January 2010; and how many of those injuries have been classified as minor or serious...
Table 1 shows the total number of injuries sustained by young people following an incident of restraint in each under 18 young offender institution (YOI) and secure training centre (STC) in each month from January 2010 to March 2011.
Table 2 shows the number of minor injuries sustained by young people following an incident of restraint in each under 18 YOI and STC in each month from January 2010 to March 2011.
Table 3 shows the number of serious injuries sustained by young people following an incident of restraint in each under 18 YOI and STC in each month from January 2010 to March 2011.
These data were provided by the Youth Justice Board (YJB).
Data for the period of April 2011 to March 2012 will be available when the 2011-12 Annual Youth Justice Statistics are published in January 2013. These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing and can be subject to change over time.
These data come from monthly returns from the youth secure estate to the YJB. Due to the way the data are collected, it is not possible to tell if the same young people are involved in multiple incidents throughout the time period.
| Table
1: Injuries following a
restraint | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | |
| Secure
Training
Centres | |||||||||||||||
| Hassockfield | 12 | 6 | 14 | 14 | 8 | 13 | 14 | 29 | 25 | 24 | 17 | 9 | 6 | 18 | 11 |
| Medway | 9 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 8 | 13 | 22 |
| Oakhill | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Rainsbrook | 8 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| STC
Total | 30 | 17 | 34 | 24 | 29 | 32 | 28 | 49 | 36 | 38 | 31 | 33 | 20 | 38 | 39 |
| Young
Offender
Institution | |||||||||||||||
| Ashfield | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
| Castington | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cookham
Wood | 3 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Downview | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eastwood
Park | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feltham | 9 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| Feltham
(Heron
Unit) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
| Foston
Hall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Hindley | 13 | 12 | 19 | 9 | 8 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 15 | 17 | 10 | 18 | 10 | 18 |
| Huntercombe | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| New
Hall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Parc | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Stoke
Heath | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Warren
Hill | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
| Warren
Hill (Carlford
Unit) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Werrington | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Wetherby— Keppel
Unit | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Wetherby | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| YOI
Total | 42 | 50 | 52 | 54 | 60 | 57 | 35 | 48 | 38 | 50 | 50 | 26 | 49 | 43 | 56 |
| Total | 72 | 67 | 86 | 78 | 89 | 89 | 63 | 97 | 74 | 88 | 81 | 59 | 69 | 81 | 95 |
| Table
2: Minor injuries following a
restraint | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | |
| Secure
Training
Centres | |||||||||||||||
| Hassockfield | 12 | 6 | 14 | 14 | 8 | 13 | 14 | 29 | 25 | 24 | 17 | 9 | 6 | 18 | 11 |
| Medway | 9 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 8 | 13 | 22 |
| Oakhill | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Rainsbrook | 8 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| STC
Total | 30 | 17 | 34 | 24 | 29 | 32 | 28 | 49 | 36 | 38 | 31 | 33 | 20 | 38 | 39 |
| Young
Offender
Institutions | |||||||||||||||
| Ashfield | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
| Castington | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cookham
Wood | 3 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Downview | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eastwood
Park | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feltham | 9 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| Feltham
(Heron
Unit) | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Foston
Hall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Hindley | 13 | 12 | 19 | 9 | 8 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 15 | 17 | 10 | 18 | 10 | 18 |
| Huntercombe | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| New
Hall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Parc | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Stoke
Heath | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Warren
Hill | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
| Warren
Hill (Carlford
Unit) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Werrington | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Wetherby— Keppel
Unit | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Wetherby | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| YOI
Total | 42 | 48 | 52 | 50 | 60 | 57 | 35 | 46 | 38 | 49 | 50 | 26 | 48 | 43 | 54 |
| Total | 72 | 65 | 86 | 74 | 89 | 89 | 63 | 95 | 74 | 87 | 81 | 59 | 68 | 81 | 93 |
| Table
3: Serious injuries following a
restraint | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | |
| Secure
Training
Centres | |||||||||||||||
| Hassockfield | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medway | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oakhill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rainsbrook | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| STC
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Young
Offender
Institutions | |||||||||||||||
| Ashfield | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Castington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cookham
Wood | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Downview | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eastwood
Park | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feltham | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Feltham
(Heron
Unit) | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Foston
Hall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Hindley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Huntercombe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| New
Hall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Parc | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stoke
Heath | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Warren
Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Warren
Hill (Carlford
Unit) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Werrington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Wetherby—Keppel
Unit | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wetherby | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| YOI
Total | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Table
1 to 3
Notes: 1. The data presented in the answer should be treated with caution. In practice, it can be difficult to attribute an injury to the restraint itself or to the reason why the restraint was used. 2. These data come from monthly returns from the secure estate to the YJB. Because of the way the data are collected, it is not possible to tell if the same young people are involved in multiple incidents throughout the time period. These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing and can be subject to change over time. 3. Data from April 2011 is provisional. Finalised data for the period of April 2011 to March 2012 will be available when the 2011-12 Annual Youth Justice Statistics are published in January 2013. 4. Data for the Heron Unit in Keltham was collected from April 2010. 5. The following changes to the YOI estate occurred during this period: Castington YOI was decommissioned in August 2010. Foston Hall was decommissioned in January 2011. Huntercombe was decommissioned in August 2010. |
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the continued conflict across the borders of South Sudan; and whether there has been an increase in (1) the number of refugees, (2) the number of conflict-related injuries, and (3) detected cases of serious illness such as meningitis.[HL4086]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the continued conflict across the borders of South Sudan; and whether there has been an increase in (1) the number of refugees, (2) the number of conflict-related injuries, and (3) detected cases of serious illness such as meningitis.[HL4086]
We remain concerned by the ongoing conflicts in Sudan’s border areas, which are having a serious effect on the area’s inhabitants. According to the Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs, over the last four weeks there has been an increase in numbers of refugees crossing the border into South Sudan, with 2,800 new refugees registered in Yida refugee camp between 26 November and 2 December. Due to a continued lack of access to the conflict areas, there are no reliable estimates of the number of conflict-related injuries. We are aware of an outbreak of hepatitis E in the Maban refugee camp in September, which is being addressed by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. We continue to press the Sudanese Government and Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North to agree a cessation of hostilities and allow full humanitarian access.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) if he will estimate the cost of firework-related injuries to the NHS in the last 12 months;
[133860]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) if he will estimate the cost of firework-related injuries to the NHS in the last 12 months;
[133860]
The Department does not collect the cost to the national health service of treating firework-related injuries. There were 164 finished admission episodes of people admitted to hospital with an external cause code of W39—Discharge of Firework—in 2011-121. This figure is not a count of all admissions for firework-related injuries, only those with this specific external cause recorded.
Note: A finished admission episode (FAE) is the first period of inpatient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. FAEs are counted against the year in which the admission episode finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of inpatients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year.
Source:
Hospital Episode Statistics, Health and Social Care Information Centre
(2) how many people were admitted to hospital for firework-related injuries in England in the last 12 months.
[133861]
Andrew Rosindell:
(2) how many people were admitted to hospital for firework-related injuries in England in the last 12 months.
[133861]
Andrew Rosindell:
The Department does not collect the cost to the national health service of treating firework-related injuries. There were 164 finished admission episodes of people admitted to hospital with an external cause code of W39—Discharge of Firework—in 2011-121. This figure is not a count of all admissions for firework-related injuries, only those with this specific external cause recorded.
Note: A finished admission episode (FAE) is the first period of inpatient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. FAEs are counted against the year in which the admission episode finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of inpatients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year.
Source:
Hospital Episode Statistics, Health and Social Care Information Centre
To ask the Secretary of State for Health with reference to the answer of 16 March 2011, Official Report, columns 445-8W, on injuries: knives, how many knife wound injuries were treated in hospitals in each primary care trust and strategic health authority in (a) Suffolk, (b) Bedfordshire, (c) Cambridgeshire, (d)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health with reference to the answer of 16 March 2011, Official Report, columns 445-8W, on injuries: knives, how many knife wound injuries were treated in hospitals in each primary care trust and strategic health authority in (a) Suffolk, (b) Bedfordshire, (c) Cambridgeshire, (d)...
The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is set out in the following table:
| Count
of finished admission episodes (FAEs)1 with an
external cause that indicates a wound from a sharp
object2 by PCT of
residence3 in East of England SHA of residence
for the years 2010-11 to 2011-12 (Activity in English NHS Hospitals and
English NHS commissioned activity in the independent
sector) | ||
| PCT
of
Residence | 2010-11 | 2011-12 |
| Bedfordshire
PCT | 64 | 60 |
| Cambridgeshire
PCT | 192 | 194 |
| Great
Yarmouth and Waverney
PCT | 43 | 38 |
| Hertfordshire
PCT | 167 | 199 |
| Luton
PCT | 41 | 48 |
| Mid
Essex
PCT | 132 | 130 |
| Norfolk
PCT | 150 | 170 |
| North
East Essex
PCT | 66 | 77 |
| Peterborough
PCT | 70 | 85 |
| South
East Essex
PCT | 100 | 116 |
| South
West Essex
PCT | 100 | 103 |
| Suffolk
PCT | 96 | 102 |
| West
Essex
PCT | 76 | 82 |
| 1
A finished admission episode (FAE) is the first period of
inpatient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider.
FAEs are counted against the year in which the admission episode
finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of inpatients, as a
person may have more than one admission within the
year. 2 A supplementary code that indicates the nature of any external cause of injury, poisoning or other adverse effects. Only the first external cause code which is coded within the episode is counted in Hospital Episode Statistics. ICD—10 Codes used: W26—Contact with knife, sword or dagger X78—Intentional self-harm by sharp object X99—Assault by sharp object Y28—Contact with sharp object, undetermined intent The above codes identifies any sharp objects, and therefore includes (but is not limited to) knife. 3 The strategic health authority (SHA) or primary care trust (PCT) containing the patient's normal home address. This does not necessarily reflect where the patient was treated as they may have travelled to another SHA/PCT for treatment. A change in methodology in 2011-12 resulted in an increase in the number of records where the PCT or SHA of residence was unknown. From 2006-07 to 2010-11 the current PCT and SHA of residence fields were populated from the recorded patient postcode. In order to improve data completeness, if the postcode was unknown the PCT, SHA and country of residence were populated from the PCT/SHA value supplied by the provider. From April 2011-12 Onwards if the patient postcode is unknown the PCT, SHA and country of residence are listed as unknown. Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), Health and Social Care Information Centre |
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people have been admitted to hospital in each of the last five years with injuries or conditions caused by excessive video game use in each (a) socio-economic group, (b) age group and (c) gender.
[131887]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people have been admitted to hospital in each of the last five years with injuries or conditions caused by excessive video game use in each (a) socio-economic group, (b) age group and (c) gender.
[131887]
The information requested is not collected centrally.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the oral answer of 29 November 2012, Official Report, column 357, on road deaths and injuries, what consideration he has given to the actions he will require, and of whom, if the level of road deaths and injuries is higher...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the oral answer of 29 November 2012, Official Report, column 357, on road deaths and injuries, what consideration he has given to the actions he will require, and of whom, if the level of road deaths and injuries is higher...
Actions required to reduce the level of deaths and injuries and by whom are set out in Annex A to the Strategic Framework for Road Safety. It would not be surprising to see some fluctuations within the context of a long-term downward trend. We will monitor performance against the indicators in the Road Safety Outcomes Framework at Annex B to the Strategic Framework and keep actions under review. The outcomes framework can be viewed online at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-transport/about/statistics
The Government have no plans to reinstate national targets. The strategic framework for road safety sets out measures that we intend to take to continue to reduce casualties. Those include making forecasts of the casualty numbers that we might expect to see through to 2030 if our measures, and the actions of local authorities, are successful.
The Government have no plans to reinstate national targets. The strategic framework for road safety sets out measures that we intend to take to continue to reduce casualties. Those include making forecasts of the casualty numbers that we might expect to see through to 2030 if our measures, and the actions of local authorities, are successful.
With the numbers killed and seriously injured on Britain’s roads increasing for the first time in 17 years, will the Secretary of State think again about
the decision to axe national targets on reducing deaths and serious injuries, which helped to focus efforts across Government, local government and the agencies?
With the numbers killed and seriously injured on Britain’s roads increasing for the first time in 17 years, will the Secretary of State think again about
the decision to axe national targets on reducing deaths and serious injuries, which helped to focus efforts across Government, local government and the agencies?
I will never take safety lightly; it must always be uppermost in the mind of the Secretary of State for Transport. The United Kingdom has a very good record. In 1979, the number of people killed on the roads was 6,352. In 2011, the number was 1,901. That is still far too many, but the country has been heading in the right direction.
I will never take safety lightly; it must always be uppermost in the mind of the Secretary of State for Transport. The United Kingdom has a very good record. In 1979, the number of people killed on the roads was 6,352. In 2011, the number was 1,901. That is still far too many, but the country has been heading in the right direction.
I will never take safety lightly; it must always be uppermost in the mind of the Secretary of State for Transport. The United Kingdom has a very good record. In 1979, the number of people killed on the roads was 6,352. In 2011, the number was 1,901. That is still far too many, but the country has been heading in the right direction.
With the numbers killed and seriously injured on Britain’s roads increasing for the first time in 17 years, will the Secretary of State think again about
the decision to axe national targets on reducing deaths and serious injuries, which helped to focus efforts across Government, local government and the agencies?
Campaigners will meet in my constituency this weekend to discuss how we can improve local road safety. There is growing support for 20 mph speed limits in residential areas. Why does the Department advise that safety has to be balanced against economic considerations and traffic flow, when there is no evidence of longer journey times in 20 mph areas?
Campaigners will meet in my constituency this weekend to discuss how we can improve local road safety. There is growing support for 20 mph speed limits in residential areas. Why does the Department advise that safety has to be balanced against economic considerations and traffic flow, when there is no evidence of longer journey times in 20 mph areas?
I am always willing to look at the hon. Lady’s representations. It is important that we take a range of measures to improve safety. We have taken a range of measures, as have the companies that produce cars. There is no doubt that cars are much more responsive in their braking power than they were 30 years ago. We have made movements in the right direction. In some areas, 20 mph speed limits are right.
I am always willing to look at the hon. Lady’s representations. It is important that we take a range of measures to improve safety. We have taken a range of measures, as have the companies that produce cars. There is no doubt that cars are much more responsive in their braking power than they were 30 years ago. We have made movements in the right direction. In some areas, 20 mph speed limits are right.
I am always willing to look at the hon. Lady’s representations. It is important that we take a range of measures to improve safety. We have taken a range of measures, as have the companies that produce cars. There is no doubt that cars are much more responsive in their braking power than they were 30 years ago. We have made movements in the right direction. In some areas, 20 mph speed limits are right.
Campaigners will meet in my constituency this weekend to discuss how we can improve local road safety. There is growing support for 20 mph speed limits in residential areas. Why does the Department advise that safety has to be balanced against economic considerations and traffic flow, when there is no evidence of longer journey times in 20 mph areas?
At a time of budget constraints, agencies understandably concentrate scarce resources on the performance targets against which they are measured. That is clearly having an impact on road safety budgets. I urge the Secretary of State to reconsider this decision because quite apart from the personal tragedy that is involved in all fatalities, it is a false economy, because every fatality costs a lot of money.
At a time of budget constraints, agencies understandably concentrate scarce resources on the performance targets against which they are measured. That is clearly having an impact on road safety budgets. I urge the Secretary of State to reconsider this decision because quite apart from the personal tragedy that is involved in all fatalities, it is a false economy, because every fatality costs a lot of money.
Indeed. The hon. Gentleman is right: a fatality not only causes huge damage and a dramatic situation for the family involved in that tragedy, but there is also cost to the health service and other services. There has been no diminution in the desire of the Department for Transport to improve road safety, and there will not be while I am Secretary of State.
Indeed. The hon. Gentleman is right: a fatality not only causes huge damage and a dramatic situation for the family involved in that tragedy, but there is also cost to the health service and other services. There has been no diminution in the desire of the Department for Transport to improve road safety, and there will not be while I am Secretary of State.
Indeed. The hon. Gentleman is right: a fatality not only causes huge damage and a dramatic situation for the family involved in that tragedy, but there is also cost to the health service and other services. There has been no diminution in the desire of the Department for Transport to improve road safety, and there will not be while I am Secretary of State.
At a time of budget constraints, agencies understandably concentrate scarce resources on the performance targets against which they are measured. That is clearly having an impact on road safety budgets. I urge the Secretary of State to reconsider this decision because quite apart from the personal tragedy that is involved in all fatalities, it is a false economy, because every fatality costs a lot of money.
The Secretary of State may be aware that road traffic deaths in the east midlands are double those in the north east per capita. As I learned from the Transport Committee inquiry into road safety, national targets allow underperforming local authorities to shelter behind the excellent performance of other local authorities, Blackpool included. Does the Secretary of State agree that national targets actually lead to more traffic deaths in some parts of the country because we are not targeting underperformance?
The Secretary of State may be aware that road traffic deaths in the east midlands are double those in the north east per capita. As I learned from the Transport Committee inquiry into road safety, national targets allow underperforming local authorities to shelter behind the excellent performance of other local authorities, Blackpool included. Does the Secretary of State agree that national targets actually lead to more traffic deaths in some parts of the country because we are not targeting underperformance?
I am grateful to my hon. Friend; he makes an interesting point. Whenever serious or fatal accidents take place I want a proper investigation to take place, the results of which can be carried across to provide experience to other local authorities throughout the United Kingdom.
I am grateful to my hon. Friend; he makes an interesting point. Whenever serious or fatal accidents take place I want a proper investigation to take place, the results of which can be carried across to provide experience to other local authorities throughout the United Kingdom.
I am grateful to my hon. Friend; he makes an interesting point. Whenever serious or fatal accidents take place I want a proper investigation to take place, the results of which can be carried across to provide experience to other local authorities throughout the United Kingdom.
The Secretary of State may be aware that road traffic deaths in the east midlands are double those in the north east per capita. As I learned from the Transport Committee inquiry into road safety, national targets allow underperforming local authorities to shelter behind the excellent performance of other local authorities, Blackpool included. Does the Secretary of State agree that national targets actually lead to more traffic deaths in some parts of the country because we are not targeting underperformance?
The Secretary of State’s decision will be bitterly regretted by campaign groups across the country. Targets introduced by the Thatcher Administration 30 years ago had cross-party support and have successfully brought down casualty rates across the country. His use of the word “forecasts” indicates that he is trying to claw something back from his predecessor’s bad decision to abolish targets. Will the Secretary of State think again? Targets are not the whole solution but a component; they are part of the way to reduce serious injuries and deaths on British roads.
The Secretary of State’s decision will be bitterly regretted by campaign groups across the country. Targets introduced by the Thatcher Administration 30 years ago had cross-party support and have successfully brought down casualty rates across the country. His use of the word “forecasts” indicates that he is trying to claw something back from his predecessor’s bad decision to abolish targets. Will the Secretary of State think again? Targets are not the whole solution but a component; they are part of the way to reduce serious injuries and deaths on British roads.
I know the hon. Gentleman takes this issue incredibly seriously, and although he talks about deaths I think we should look at the seriously injured as well. In the year ending June 2012, there were 1,790 deaths on British roads—a 6% drop on the year before.