Skip to main content

1-20 of 846 results for subject:Liability

Year X
2012

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Patrick McLoughlin
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
21 December 2012
Reference
SI 2012/3152
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
CHAP 21 2012; 2012 c. 21

My Lords, I cannot claim the prophetic prescience of my biblical near-namesake, so it is entirely fortuitous that the three amendments to which I speak will be debated the day after the announcement of what the media have described as a $1.9 billion, or £1.2 billion, fine imposed by the...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2012
Reference
741 cc1080-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the change in position made by the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, between Committee and today regarding allowing Parliament to discuss the prosecution code without it being incorporated in a statutory instrument. It might help the Director of Public Prosecutions, the director of the Serious Fraud Office...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2012
Reference
741 c1082
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 116DA and 116DB revisit an issue that we considered in Committee: namely, parliamentary scrutiny of a code of practice for prosecutors to support the DPA scheme. However, as the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, said, the issue has changed somewhat. In providing for a code of practice for...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2012
Reference
741 cc1082-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Wills, the noble Lord, Lord Low of Dalston, and of course my noble friend Lady Dean of Thornton-le-Fylde for agreeing to support Amendment 22. I am also grateful to the Minister, the noble Lord, Lord Marland, for agreeing to meet...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 December 2012
Reference
741 cc254-5GC
House
House of Lords

Lords Second Reading Committee motion to consider the Bill. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness
Answering member
Lord McAvoy
Department
Scotland Office; Second Reading Committee
Type
Debates on bills; Second Reading Committee proceedings
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc173-192GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Partnerships (Prosecution) (Scotland) Bill takes forward the proposals of the Scottish Law Commission to address the loophole that makes it impossible at present to prosecute partnerships that have dissolved. In 2004, a fire at the Rosepark Nursing Home in Uddingston led to the death of 14 elderly...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc173-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when it comes to a topic such as this, I stand slightly in awe of venturing forth among those with such distinguished experience of both law and government. I hope that the Committee will forgive me if some of my questions are a little simplistic as a result....

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc176-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not delay the Committee long. This is rightly an opportunity for the legal profession to look at the terms of the Bill in some detail. The reason for my interest stems from the fact that I know Rosepark home. I was born and brought up in...

Member
Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 c178GC
House
House of Lords

Before I was interrupted—I will not say rudely—by your Lordships’ House, I was making the point that the Rosepark story is horrific. The loopholes in the law allowed a terrible injustice to happen to the families and friends of the 14 people who lost their lives.

In respect of the Bill,...

Member
Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc178-9GC
House
House of Lords

I, too, thank and congratulate the Scottish Law Commission on the excellent work that it has done on this issue. I also thank the Advocate-General and the Scotland Office for all their work over the past few months, since the Scottish Law Commission reported, to bring this Bill forward. It...

Member
Lord Stephen (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc179-181GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in its report on the criminal liability of partnerships, the Scottish Law Commission pointed out that the effect of Balmer was that once a partnership had been dissolved, and in the absence of evidence showing the guilt of one or more individual partners, there remained no person who...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc181-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, not having a brief and not being a brief, I can be brief. I should just like to say three things. I thank the Minister for bringing forward this Bill, which is clearly necessary to remedy a loophole that came to light following the tragedy. I also thank...

Member
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc182-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, warmly welcome the Bill and the undoubted amount of work that has gone into its preparation by the Scottish Law Commission.

I have discussed this matter with one of my distinguished predecessors as Lord Advocate, namely my noble and learned friend Lord Mackay of Clashfern. I am...

Member
Lord Fraser of Carmyllie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 c185GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will reply to as many points as I can. First, I place on record again my thanks to the Minister and his staff for keeping in touch. I am sorry that I did not make the meeting;

I was called away on Whips’ business. However, I learnt...

Member
Lord McAvoy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc185-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this very helpful debate. I say immediately to those who said they were subscribing to the “daft questions” brigade that in my experience such questions are usually just as penetrating, and sometimes more difficult to answer, than those produced...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc187-9GC
House
House of Lords

Earlier, when talking about individuals, my noble and learned friend said that it was intended that no time limit should apply. Does that mean, if the individual is charged after the partnership, that there is no five-year limit at all?

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 c188GC
House
House of Lords

That is indeed what I said. It is subject to the fact that there may well be an offence for which there is already in law a statutory time limit. Indeed, a number of these offences will have provisions in law which set a statutory time limit.

If this Bill proceeds...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc188-192GC
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Maria Miller
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Unprinted papers
Notes
Withdrawn and replaced on 18 November 2013 (UP 840)
Date
21 November 2012
House
House of Lords; House of Commons