Skip to main content

1-20 of 162 results for subject:Ofcom

Year X
2012

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, Clause 45 gives the Competition and Markets Authority stronger powers to co-ordinate Competition Act enforcement work and gives sector regulators explicit duties to consider using the Competition Act. This will strengthen the regime for the concurrent competition powers.

The Government want to send a further signal about the need...

Member
Lord Marland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2012
Reference
741 cc510-1GC
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many people (a) viewed Ofcom's new website on nuisance calls, texts and emails and (b) received or downloaded a copy of the new Consumer Guide between 1 October and 30 November 2012.

[133412]

Asked by
Mike Crockart (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 December 2012
Reference
133412; 555 c554W
House
House of Commons

I. Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill. Amendments to be moved in committee. 2 p. II. Letter dated 06/12/12 from Lord Marland of Odstock to Lord Stevenson of Balmacara regarding a new clause to provide a power to remove concurrent competition functions of sectoral regulators - after clause 45. 2 p.

Deposited by
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Deposited papers
Date
6 December 2012
Reference
DEP2012-1839
House
House of Lords

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the matter of the Leveson report into the culture, practices and ethics of the press.

Lord Justice Leveson’s report marks a dark moment in the history of the British press. In the words of the judge, the press have

“wreaked havoc with the lives...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 December 2012
Reference
554 c594
House
House of Commons

I most sincerely hope not. As I said earlier, all-party talks started, as I understand it, at five o’clock. When I had the pleasure earlier today of sitting in on a meeting between the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister, there were both clearly determined that this issue would...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
741 c355
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should declare an interest as chairman of the Cumbrian Newspaper Group, not that that makes me much of a press baron.

Will my noble friend confirm that the Government accept Lord Justice Leveson’s findings of fact in his report?

Member
Lord Inglewood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
741 c355
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the report of the Leveson Inquiry.

Lead member
Lord McNally
Type
Ministerial statements
Notes
Repetition of the statement made by the Deputy Prime Minister in the House of Commons.
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
741 cc350-360
House
House of Lords

Statement on the report of the Leveson Inquiry.

Lead member
Nick Clegg
Department
Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Ministerial statements
Notes
Statement also made by the Prime Minister.
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 cc469-482
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to make a further statement to the House. I know it is unusual, but this is an unusual debate.

The terms of reference for Lord Justice Leveson’s inquiry were agreed on a cross-party basis and, as the House has heard, we intend to proceed on...

Member
Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 cc470-2
House
House of Commons

I thank the Deputy Prime Minister for his excellent statement. This is an unprecedented procedure, but it was important for him to make it as leader of his party. As he has said, our democracy needs, indeed depends upon, the existence of a free press, but a strong press must...

Member
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c471
House
House of Commons

It is obvious, of course, that the Prime Minister and I come at this from different angles, but the right hon. and learned Lady should not overlook the perfectly legitimate misgivings—I happen not to share them, but they are none the less misgivings—that the Prime Minister has expressed about legislation...

Member
Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 cc471-3
House
House of Commons

I declare an interest as a member of the media law Bar.

Will the Deputy Prime Minister—it is always a joy to hear him—set out very briefly the differences in principle between the view that he takes and that of the Prime Minister?

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c473
House
House of Commons

The difference is that I believe that the case for legislation has been made, but of course I acknowledge that we now need to show how it could be delivered in practice in a proportionate and workable way. The Prime Minister—I hesitate to recap what he said while he is...

Member
Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c473
House
House of Commons

Echoing an important point made by the hon. Member for Camborne and Redruth (George Eustice), does the Deputy Prime Minister accept that the Prime Minister was incorrect when he talked about crossing the Rubicon in writing elements of press regulation into the law of the land, because the press themselves...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c473
House
House of Commons

What I think we can all agree on—Lord Justice Leveson places great emphasis on this in his report—is that none of this would have arisen if the press had abided by its own code. What surprised all witnesses to the Leveson inquiry—it certainly surprised me, because I was not familiar...

Member
Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c473
House
House of Commons

Does the Deputy Prime Minister agree that one of the greatest expressions of liberty in the world is the first amendment to the American constitution—a measure in statute if ever there was one? That has proved to be compatible with legal restrictions on copyright and obscenity which, as in this...

Member
Martin Horwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c474
House
House of Commons

I accept that there is a big philosophical difference between liberals, who, as I have sought to explain, try to balance freedom with the hurt endured by people who are abused by the powerful, and libertarianism, which believes that freedom should be completely untrammelled and unconstrained. The latter is not...

Member
Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c474
House
House of Commons

The detail of the new regulatory body is critical, but does the Deputy Prime Minister accept that it is only within the legal underpinning that the public support that is so crucial to any new regulator is carried?

Member
Jim Dowd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c474
House
House of Commons

I have expressed my own views about the assertions that Lord Justice Leveson makes about that. As I said, this is a debate about means, not ends. Let us dwell for a minute on the fact that this afternoon everybody appears to have agreed that what we need is tough,...

Member
Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c474
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my right hon. Friend the Deputy Prime Minister on anticipating what was in the Leveson report and on anticipating that he would have a disagreement with my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister.

How does my right hon. Friend the Deputy Prime Minister think statutory underpinning by Ofcom would...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 November 2012
Reference
554 c474
House
House of Commons