Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for dept:"Procedure Committee"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Eighth backbench debate (part one). Motion that this House has considered the publication of the second report from the Procedure Committee, Private Members' Bills, HC 188. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Charles Walker
Department
Procedure Committee
Type
Backbench debates; Debates on select committee reports
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 cc25-31
House
House of Commons

I would go further than the hon. Gentleman and indeed the report, although it contains some useful comments. The present system is not just a farce; it is completely and utterly dishonest. It wastes Members’ time and misleads the public about what we do on a Friday. May I suggest...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c25
House
House of Commons

I hear what the hon. Gentleman says, and I thank him for putting his views so forcefully. He gave excellent evidence to the Committee and I will come on to the points he raises and try to address them.

Some 90% of the Bills now reaching statute that are marked as...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c25
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman and the Committee for their first-class work. I have two reservations about the report, however, that I would like briefly to put to him. As one who was fortunate enough to see two private Members’ Bills enacted thanks to the support of colleagues in all...

Member
Tom Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c25
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for those observations. First, we are sticking with Fridays because a year ago the House took a view that it wanted Backbench business to remain on Fridays. It would not be for the Committee to suggest moving such Bills from Fridays 12 months after...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c26
House
House of Commons

May I say what an excellent job the Chairman does of chairing the Procedure Committee? However, given the number of people in the Chamber to hear his eloquent remarks, does he not think that it would be helpful if the Government found sufficient time at the earliest opportunity for the...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c26
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman. I know that the Leader of the House is positively chomping at the bit to find time for the report to be debated, because he is a great reformer and is entirely reform-minded. Indeed, I feel that I am presenting these reforms today with...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c26
House
House of Commons

Before any chomping starts, does my hon. Friend agree that although most private Members’ Bills are Government sponsored, as he mentioned, that is the choice of the private Member?

Member
Paul Beresford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c26
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a fantastic point, but if private Members felt that they had a genuine chance of getting their own legislation on to the statute book or that the Government would at least give it a proper hearing, we might begin to redress the balance.

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c26
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Paul Beresford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c26
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is shaking his head; I think we shall have to disagree on this.

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c26
House
House of Commons

I thank the Chairman for giving way and congratulate him on his efforts in keeping the Committee working on this project. Does he agree that it is an opportunity to move the balance of power in the constitution away from the Executive and towards the democratically elected legislature? We should...

Member
John Hemming (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c26
House
House of Commons

That is very much the flavour of this moment in time. I thank my hon. Friend for making that observation, but if hon. Members are happy that 90% of private Members’ Bills are in fact Government handout Bills, there is a good argument for returning the 13 Fridays back to...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c27
House
House of Commons

I signed the report and very much support the idea behind it, but does my hon. Friend not agree that that mechanism risks encouraging populism behind Bills, rather than encouraging Bills that are worthy but obscure?

Member
James Gray (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c27
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very good point. There is much to commend the current ballot system, but it is incumbent on the Committee to put a series of proposals before the House so that it can come to its own view, because the House is populated by extremely wise...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c27
House
House of Commons

I have been able to read the Procedure Committee’s report since it was issued this morning, and I greatly welcome it. Were it to be implemented, it would result in a sea change in the attitude of Members on both sides of the House to private Members’ legislation, and their...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c27
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has made some useful observations. In preparation for this afternoon’s debate, I wrote a very long, tedious and laborious speech, but I do not think that I shall have time to make it. Instead, I shall demonstrate the clear thinking of the moderately informed by answering...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c28
House
House of Commons

I want to refer the hon. Gentleman back to the answer that he gave to the right hon. Member for Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill (Mr Clarke). The hon. Gentleman suggested that it would not be right to reconsider the moving of the debates on private Members’ Bills to the middle...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c28
House
House of Commons

Any motions that we table are amendable, and if there is a desire in the House to consider a day other than Friday for such debates, the House may do so. It is not incumbent on the Procedure Committee to

tell anyone to behave in a particular way. We have...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c28
House
House of Commons

I may have missed it, but does my hon. Friend’s excellent report deal anywhere with the issue of one single Member shouting out “Object”, effectively killing or pushing into the very long grass a Bill that might have widespread public support? Did my hon. Friend and his colleagues look at...

Member
Andrew Selous (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 September 2013
Reference
567 c29
House
House of Commons