Skip to main content

1-20 of 43 results for subject:"Select Committee reports"

Year X
2013

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether (a) he, (b) his ministerial colleagues, (c) a Parliamentary Private Secretary to any Minister in his Department, (d) any of his Department's special advisers and (e) officials in his Department saw a draft or any part of a draft...

Asked by
Rachel Reeves (Labour)
Answering body
Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
175526; 570 c690W
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Procedure Committee (HL)
Date
21 October 2013
Reference
HL 63 2013-14
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office whether it remains the policy of the Government to respond to reports from Select Committees of the House within two months.

Asked by
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 October 2013
Reference
170665; 568 c865W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chairman of Committees what steps he will take to ensure that adequate notice is given in House of Lords Business of forthcoming motions to approve reports of the domestic committees of this House.[HL6197]

Asked by
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2013
Reference
744 c204WA; HL6197
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees what steps he will take to ensure that motions to approve reports of the domestic committees of this House are tabled in such a way as to provide details on the Order Paper of the matters with which those reports deal.[HL6196]

Asked by
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2013
Reference
744 cc203-4WA; HL6196
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee reports (Government responses); Parliamentary committees
Committee
Procedure Committee
Date
6 February 2013
Reference
HC 978 2012-13
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chairman of Committees what has been the saving from the reduction in the printing of select committee evidence arising out of the House of Lords savings strategy and financial plan approved in 2010.[HL4858]

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 February 2013
Reference
743 c14WA; HL4858
House
House of Lords

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that another way to ensure that we scrutinise much better what is happening in Europe is to have better liaison relationships with Chairs of Committees in other national Parliaments? That will help us to understand what is happening in those countries and develop these...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1128
House
House of Commons

Yes, I agree. I have tried to do that, as has the right hon. Gentleman, conspicuously so, in the home affairs field. We should also communicate more effectively with British Members of the European Parliament so that they are aware when Committees have done some work on a subject and...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 cc1128-9
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend will be aware that my Committee—the Culture, Media and Sport Committee—has perhaps tested the boundaries of Select Committee powers more than most. The situation seems unsatisfactory in two areas. First, when we served warrants on Rupert and James Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks to appear before the...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1129
House
House of Commons

That is certainly true and I think it is one of the issues that will have to be examined by the Joint Committee, which is about to embark on this work. The problems are difficult to solve and affect only a few inquiries. They certainly affected the work of my...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1129
House
House of Commons

What was the Liaison Committee’s thinking behind paragraph 133 of the report? It states that the Committee was

“persuaded that the disadvantages of enshrining parliamentary privilege in statute would outweigh the benefits”,

but that conclusion was reached ahead of all the work that is being done. It seems to pre-empt a lot...

Member
Angela Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1129
House
House of Commons

It was an honest statement of the view of Committee members that the possibility of the activities of the House being questioned in the courts as a consequence of the exercise of powers would be more damaging to the House than the current situation. Were the Joint Committee to come...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1130
House
House of Commons

I must back my right hon. Friend and say how much I agree with him. I was one of those on the Liaison Committee who felt that very strongly. We have had people who were not keen to appear before the Education Committee, but they were told that they were...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1130
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend puts the point extremely well.

The appearances of members of the Government and civil service officials are governed by the Osmotherly rules. The Committee is stringent about those rules in paragraph 113 :

“We do not accept that the Osmotherly rules should have any bearing on whom a select...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1130
House
House of Commons

I welcome the opportunity to debate this report briefly. Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that this is not just about officials appearing before Committees? The Environmental Audit Committee had hoped that the Deputy Prime Minister could meet our long-standing request for him to appear before us and report back...

Member
Joan Walley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1130
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady raises an—

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1130
House
House of Commons

Mr Deputy Speaker, I hope that you will bear it in mind that several hon. Members, having looked at the clock, have decided to get their point across by intervening on me.

I should like to answer the hon. Lady’s question. She makes an important point. The Prime Minister and the...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1131
House
House of Commons

It is a real pleasure to follow the Chairman of the Liaison Committee, the right hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed (Sir Alan Beith). He covered so much ground with his description of how the Select Committees began that I am tempted just to say, “I agree” and sit down. But this...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 cc1131-4
House
House of Commons

I will try to be mindful of your suggestion, Mr Deputy Speaker.

I am delighted that the Backbench Business Committee has allocated time for us to debate the report of the Liaison Committee following the 2010 Wright reforms. It is fair to say that Select Committees are stronger and have more...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 cc1132-5
House
House of Commons