Skip to main content

1-20 of 298 results for subject:Fares

Year X
2013

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 11 November 2013, Official Report, column 456W, on railways: fares, what the percentage increase in fares was for each of the train operating companies in each of the last three years.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2013
Reference
176416; 571 cc108-9W
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Patrick McLoughlin
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Command papers
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
Cm. 8752
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Deposited by
Department for Transport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
DEP2013-1833
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Kramer on 31 October (WA 298), what financial compensation is paid to train operating companies in respect of free and reduced travel facilities for former British Rail staff on trains.[HL3224]

Asked by
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 November 2013
Reference
HL3224; 749 cc117-8WA
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average bus fare was in real terms in each of the last three years.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
174437; 570 c452W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average rail fare was in each of the last three years.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2013
Reference
174439; 570 c456W
House
House of Commons

What progress he has made on reviewing the structure of rail passenger fares.

Asked by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
900947; 570 cc397-8
House
House of Commons

What recent assessment he has made of East Coast Main Line Ltd's financial performance.

Asked by
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
900958; 570 cc398-9
House
House of Commons

What progress he has made on reviewing the structure of rail passenger fares.

Asked by
Marcus Jones (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
900957; 570 c399
House
House of Commons

The Government’s policy on rail fares will offer scant consolation to my constituents, who not only have to travel on unbearably overcrowded trains into central London but in the past two years have been asked to pay £100 more for their annual season ticket. What guarantee can the Secretary of State give that above-inflation increases in rail fares will be matched by a comparable increase in capacity?

Asked by
Heidi Alexander (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c405
House
House of Commons

There is a problem, but we are investing record amounts in the rail industry. Over the next five years, Network Rail will invest some £38 billion in the railway network. Those are very significant investments that are bringing on new rolling stock and better capacity and efficiency to try to help people who are suffering. I do accept, particularly where there is overcrowding, that we need to try to do more to help those consumers.

Answered by
Lord McLoughlin (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c405
House
House of Commons

The “Rail Fares and Ticketing: Next Steps” report was published on 9 October following

a wide-ranging review and public consultation. It contains a number of measures to give passengers a better, more modern, and more flexible deal on fares and to improve the current ticketing system.

Answered by
Stephen Hammond (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c397
House
House of Commons

Swindon commuters who have no choice but to travel at peak times face increasing fares and want value for money. What plans does my hon. Friend have to increase flexibility and reduce costs for rail fare payers and season ticket holders?

Asked by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c398
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. The train operating companies set the prices for season tickets and for fares. I recognise that Swindon is a popular commuting town that benefits from the frequent services on high-speed trains to London, Wales and the west country. Nevertheless, he is right and he will have noticed the announcement from the Government restricting “flex”, which means that none of his commuters will face a fare increase of more than 3% above inflation from January 2014.

Answered by
Stephen Hammond (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c398
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady will obviously have read the Brown report, which suggests that franchising is the best way to secure better deals and more investment for passengers. That is why we are continuing to franchise and are putting the east coast main line out to franchise.

Answered by
Stephen Hammond (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c398
House
House of Commons

I remind my hon. Friend that commuters who are reliant on coming into London to work do not have any flexibility in their work times. What ideas does he have to get a better deal for commuters, who are a captive market and who have regulated fares?

Asked by
Simon Burns (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c398
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend for the excellent work that he did in contributing to the rail fares review. He will know that we have restricted fares to RPI plus 1%, which “flex” has also reduced, so no one will pay more than 3% above RPI. He will also remember that the document suggests considering ways to provide season ticket holders with more flexible arrangements.

Answered by
Stephen Hammond (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c398
House
House of Commons

The Government’s fare review took 18 months and has delivered fare rises of up to 6%. That 6% is twice the rate of inflation and is cold comfort for commuters struggling as their incomes fall in real terms. Is that really the best the Minister can do for commuters struggling with the Government’s cost of living crisis?

Asked by
Mary Creagh (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c398
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady will know that the formula for regulated fares is RPI plus 1%. Unlike her Government, we have reduced flexibility to 2%. We have made that permanent, something that the Government of the hon. Member for Nottingham South (Lilian Greenwood), who is shouting from the opposite Bench,

did not do. She may just wish to remember this, which was in the franchise arrangement from 1 January 2011:

“the amendment to the Franchise Agreement set out in this notice of amendment shall be reversed.”

They did not scrap it; they put it in place for one year only.

Answered by
Stephen Hammond (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 cc398-9
House
House of Commons

The Department for Transport announced in September that it would cap standard return fares at £500. Given that no one will benefit from that £500 fare cap, is that not just another example of the Minister’s smoke and mirrors on fares?

Asked by
Mary Creagh (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2013
Reference
570 c399
House
House of Commons