1-20 of 298 results for subject:Fares
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.348 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Fares
- We searched for
- subject_t:Fares OR subject_t:"Passenger fares" OR subject_ses:91233
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 11 November 2013, Official Report, column 456W, on railways: fares, what the percentage increase in fares was for each of the train operating companies in each of the last three years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 11 November 2013, Official Report, column 456W, on railways: fares, what the percentage increase in fares was for each of the train operating companies in each of the last three years.
The Department does not hold information for annual fare increases by train operators. For regulated fares, the average permitted increases were as follows:
| Percentage | |
| 2011 | 6 |
| 2012 | 4.2 |
| 2013 | 4.1 |
Train operators are not required to advise the Department of increases to unregulated fares. The Association of Train Operating Companies has published figures for annual increases for all fares (regulated and unregulated) across the network, as follows:
| Percentage | |
| 2011 | 6.2 |
| 2012 | 5.9 |
| 2013 | 3.9 |
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Kramer on 31 October (WA 298), what financial compensation is paid to train operating companies in respect of free and reduced travel facilities for former British Rail staff on trains.[HL3224]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Kramer on 31 October (WA 298), what financial compensation is paid to train operating companies in respect of free and reduced travel facilities for former British Rail staff on trains.[HL3224]
Free and reduced travel facilities on trains may be offered by train operators to their staff who were formerly employed by British Rail, as part of their employment package. Specific financial compensation is not paid to train operators to offset any notional cost or revenue loss to train operators.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average bus fare was in real terms in each of the last three years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average bus fare was in real terms in each of the last three years.
This information is not held in the form requested. However, my Department does publish a local bus fares index. This provides information at constant prices for Great Britain. Figures for the last three years are as follows:
| Local
bus fares index (at constant prices1) by
metropolitan area status and country: Great
Britain | |||||||
| March
2005=100 | |||||||
| Year2 | London | English
metropolitan
areas | English
non-metropolitan
areas | England | Scotland | Wales | Great
Britain |
| 2011 | 118.4 | 119.9 | 97.8 | 111.2 | 108.3 | 106.6 | 110.8 |
| 2012 | 120.5 | 123.6 | 100.5 | 114.0 | 110.1 | 109.0 | 113.4 |
| 2013 | 122.1 | 123.5 | 102.9 | 115.5 | 111.2 | 112.8 | 115.0 |
| 1
Adjusted for inflation using the
RPI 2 Index as at March |
The full table, which includes figures from 1995 onwards, can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/206999/bus0405.xls
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average rail fare was in each of the last three years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average rail fare was in each of the last three years.
The Office of Rail Regulation publishes information on the average revenue per passenger journey made with franchised rail operators. The figures for the last three years are as follows:
| Franchised
passenger journeys
(million) | Franchised
passenger revenue (£
million) | Average
revenue per journey
(£) | |
| 2010-11 | 1,354 | 6,620 | 4.89 |
| 2011-12 | 1,460 | 7,229 | 4.95 |
| 2012-13 | 1,502 | 7,707 | 5.13 |
| Source: Office of Rail Regulation |
What progress he has made on reviewing the structure of rail passenger fares.
What progress he has made on reviewing the structure of rail passenger fares.
The “Rail Fares and Ticketing: Next Steps” report was published on 9 October following
a wide-ranging review and public consultation. It contains a number of measures to give passengers a better, more modern, and more flexible deal on fares and to improve the current ticketing system.
What recent assessment he has made of East Coast Main Line Ltd's financial performance.
What recent assessment he has made of East Coast Main Line Ltd's financial performance.
The hon. Lady will obviously have read the Brown report, which suggests that franchising is the best way to secure better deals and more investment for passengers. That is why we are continuing to franchise and are putting the east coast main line out to franchise.
What progress he has made on reviewing the structure of rail passenger fares.
What progress he has made on reviewing the structure of rail passenger fares.
The Government’s policy on rail fares will offer scant consolation to my constituents, who not only have to travel on unbearably overcrowded trains into central London but in the past two years have been asked to pay £100 more for their annual season ticket. What guarantee can the Secretary of State give that above-inflation increases in rail fares will be matched by a comparable increase in capacity?
The Government’s policy on rail fares will offer scant consolation to my constituents, who not only have to travel on unbearably overcrowded trains into central London but in the past two years have been asked to pay £100 more for their annual season ticket. What guarantee can the Secretary of State give that above-inflation increases in rail fares will be matched by a comparable increase in capacity?
There is a problem, but we are investing record amounts in the rail industry. Over the next five years, Network Rail will invest some £38 billion in the railway network. Those are very significant investments that are bringing on new rolling stock and better capacity and efficiency to try to help people who are suffering. I do accept, particularly where there is overcrowding, that we need to try to do more to help those consumers.
There is a problem, but we are investing record amounts in the rail industry. Over the next five years, Network Rail will invest some £38 billion in the railway network. Those are very significant investments that are bringing on new rolling stock and better capacity and efficiency to try to help people who are suffering. I do accept, particularly where there is overcrowding, that we need to try to do more to help those consumers.
There is a problem, but we are investing record amounts in the rail industry. Over the next five years, Network Rail will invest some £38 billion in the railway network. Those are very significant investments that are bringing on new rolling stock and better capacity and efficiency to try to help people who are suffering. I do accept, particularly where there is overcrowding, that we need to try to do more to help those consumers.
The Government’s policy on rail fares will offer scant consolation to my constituents, who not only have to travel on unbearably overcrowded trains into central London but in the past two years have been asked to pay £100 more for their annual season ticket. What guarantee can the Secretary of State give that above-inflation increases in rail fares will be matched by a comparable increase in capacity?
The “Rail Fares and Ticketing: Next Steps” report was published on 9 October following
a wide-ranging review and public consultation. It contains a number of measures to give passengers a better, more modern, and more flexible deal on fares and to improve the current ticketing system.
The “Rail Fares and Ticketing: Next Steps” report was published on 9 October following
a wide-ranging review and public consultation. It contains a number of measures to give passengers a better, more modern, and more flexible deal on fares and to improve the current ticketing system.
What progress he has made on reviewing the structure of rail passenger fares.
Swindon commuters who have no choice but to travel at peak times face increasing fares and want value for money. What plans does my hon. Friend have to increase flexibility and reduce costs for rail fare payers and season ticket holders?
Swindon commuters who have no choice but to travel at peak times face increasing fares and want value for money. What plans does my hon. Friend have to increase flexibility and reduce costs for rail fare payers and season ticket holders?
My hon. Friend is right. The train operating companies set the prices for season tickets and for fares. I recognise that Swindon is a popular commuting town that benefits from the frequent services on high-speed trains to London, Wales and the west country. Nevertheless, he is right and he will have noticed the announcement from the Government restricting “flex”, which means that none of his commuters will face a fare increase of more than 3% above inflation from January 2014.
My hon. Friend is right. The train operating companies set the prices for season tickets and for fares. I recognise that Swindon is a popular commuting town that benefits from the frequent services on high-speed trains to London, Wales and the west country. Nevertheless, he is right and he will have noticed the announcement from the Government restricting “flex”, which means that none of his commuters will face a fare increase of more than 3% above inflation from January 2014.
My hon. Friend is right. The train operating companies set the prices for season tickets and for fares. I recognise that Swindon is a popular commuting town that benefits from the frequent services on high-speed trains to London, Wales and the west country. Nevertheless, he is right and he will have noticed the announcement from the Government restricting “flex”, which means that none of his commuters will face a fare increase of more than 3% above inflation from January 2014.
Swindon commuters who have no choice but to travel at peak times face increasing fares and want value for money. What plans does my hon. Friend have to increase flexibility and reduce costs for rail fare payers and season ticket holders?
The hon. Lady will obviously have read the Brown report, which suggests that franchising is the best way to secure better deals and more investment for passengers. That is why we are continuing to franchise and are putting the east coast main line out to franchise.
The hon. Lady will obviously have read the Brown report, which suggests that franchising is the best way to secure better deals and more investment for passengers. That is why we are continuing to franchise and are putting the east coast main line out to franchise.
What recent assessment he has made of East Coast Main Line Ltd's financial performance.
I remind my hon. Friend that commuters who are reliant on coming into London to work do not have any flexibility in their work times. What ideas does he have to get a better deal for commuters, who are a captive market and who have regulated fares?
I remind my hon. Friend that commuters who are reliant on coming into London to work do not have any flexibility in their work times. What ideas does he have to get a better deal for commuters, who are a captive market and who have regulated fares?
I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend for the excellent work that he did in contributing to the rail fares review. He will know that we have restricted fares to RPI plus 1%, which “flex” has also reduced, so no one will pay more than 3% above RPI. He will also remember that the document suggests considering ways to provide season ticket holders with more flexible arrangements.
I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend for the excellent work that he did in contributing to the rail fares review. He will know that we have restricted fares to RPI plus 1%, which “flex” has also reduced, so no one will pay more than 3% above RPI. He will also remember that the document suggests considering ways to provide season ticket holders with more flexible arrangements.
I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend for the excellent work that he did in contributing to the rail fares review. He will know that we have restricted fares to RPI plus 1%, which “flex” has also reduced, so no one will pay more than 3% above RPI. He will also remember that the document suggests considering ways to provide season ticket holders with more flexible arrangements.
I remind my hon. Friend that commuters who are reliant on coming into London to work do not have any flexibility in their work times. What ideas does he have to get a better deal for commuters, who are a captive market and who have regulated fares?
The Government’s fare review took 18 months and has delivered fare rises of up to 6%. That 6% is twice the rate of inflation and is cold comfort for commuters struggling as their incomes fall in real terms. Is that really the best the Minister can do for commuters struggling with the Government’s cost of living crisis?
The Government’s fare review took 18 months and has delivered fare rises of up to 6%. That 6% is twice the rate of inflation and is cold comfort for commuters struggling as their incomes fall in real terms. Is that really the best the Minister can do for commuters struggling with the Government’s cost of living crisis?
The hon. Lady will know that the formula for regulated fares is RPI plus 1%. Unlike her Government, we have reduced flexibility to 2%. We have made that permanent, something that the Government of the hon. Member for Nottingham South (Lilian Greenwood), who is shouting from the opposite Bench,
did not do. She may just wish to remember this, which was in the franchise arrangement from 1 January 2011:
“the amendment to the Franchise Agreement set out in this notice of amendment shall be reversed.”
They did not scrap it; they put it in place for one year only.
The hon. Lady will know that the formula for regulated fares is RPI plus 1%. Unlike her Government, we have reduced flexibility to 2%. We have made that permanent, something that the Government of the hon. Member for Nottingham South (Lilian Greenwood), who is shouting from the opposite Bench,
did not do. She may just wish to remember this, which was in the franchise arrangement from 1 January 2011:
“the amendment to the Franchise Agreement set out in this notice of amendment shall be reversed.”
They did not scrap it; they put it in place for one year only.
The hon. Lady will know that the formula for regulated fares is RPI plus 1%. Unlike her Government, we have reduced flexibility to 2%. We have made that permanent, something that the Government of the hon. Member for Nottingham South (Lilian Greenwood), who is shouting from the opposite Bench,
did not do. She may just wish to remember this, which was in the franchise arrangement from 1 January 2011:
“the amendment to the Franchise Agreement set out in this notice of amendment shall be reversed.”
They did not scrap it; they put it in place for one year only.
The Government’s fare review took 18 months and has delivered fare rises of up to 6%. That 6% is twice the rate of inflation and is cold comfort for commuters struggling as their incomes fall in real terms. Is that really the best the Minister can do for commuters struggling with the Government’s cost of living crisis?
The Department for Transport announced in September that it would cap standard return fares at £500. Given that no one will benefit from that £500 fare cap, is that not just another example of the Minister’s smoke and mirrors on fares?
The Department for Transport announced in September that it would cap standard return fares at £500. Given that no one will benefit from that £500 fare cap, is that not just another example of the Minister’s smoke and mirrors on fares?
A number of things were announced in that review. The fare cap was a voluntary initiative put in place by the rail industry. We have not assessed, and nor has anyone else, how many passengers will benefit from that. We have also announced a reduction in the fares “basket flex”, a trial of single-leg pricing for off-peak returns, a trial of flexible ticketing, including discounted fares in quieter periods, and a new code of practice on ticketing information.