Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:"Select Committee reports"

Year X
2014

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Leader of the House how many times in the last 10 years no Government response to a Lords Select Committee report was forthcoming eight months or longer after the report’s publication; and what were the subjects of the report or reports in question.

Asked by
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Lords
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 November 2014
Reference
HL2730
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to agree the third report from the Procedure Select Committee on House of Lords Reform Act 2014: Further Consequential Changes; Questions for Short Debate; Queen's and Prince of Wales' Consents (HL 50). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Sewel
Department
Chairman of Committees (HL); Procedure Committee (HL)
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
30 October 2014
Reference
756 cc1314-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to the Motion to amend Standing Orders.

The report makes five recommendations. The first three are consequential on the House of Lords Reform Act 2014. The first recommendation is that Members who have given written notice that they will retire from the House under Section...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2014
Reference
756 cc1314-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Chairman of Committees for his comments. I have a question for him on the consent to Bill of the Queen and the Prince of Wales, which is referred to in items 12 and 13 in the Procedure Committee’s report.

He will be aware, I...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2014
Reference
756 c1315
House
House of Lords

I have a couple of questions for the Chairman of Committees about the sections of the report dealing with retirement. The proposals he has brought to the House are, I am sure, acceptable. However, they are a bit of a mouse, because the Act, for which I had some responsibility,...

Member
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2014
Reference
756 c1316
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as regards the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Steel, as the Chairman of Committees will know, the current Government have enunciated a new rule, if you like, that the proportion and number of Members of your Lordships’ House should bear direct comparison with the votes cast at...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2014
Reference
756 c1316
House
House of Lords

I should like to make two points. First, I do not agree with my noble friend Lord Steel about financial inducement to retirement. That would be a very bad precedent and I hope that it will not happen. Secondly, what are the detailed arrangements for giving Royal Assent to Bills?...

Member
Lord Trefgarne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2014
Reference
756 c1316
House
House of Lords

Let me try to deal with the issues in some sort of order. I am involved in so many committees that sometimes even I get a bit confused about which committee is considering what. First, on retirement, I am not aware of any committee actively considering any retirement scheme as...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2014
Reference
756 cc1316-7
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Procedure Committee (HL)
Date
15 October 2014
Reference
HL 50 2014-15
House
House of Lords

Written guidance produced by the Cabinet Office, commonly referred to as the Osmotherly rules, specifies that Departments should aim to provide the considered Government response to both Commons and Lords Select Committee reports within two months of their publication.

Answered by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
584 c440
House
House of Commons

The “revolving door” is the pernicious system whereby senior Ministers, military people and civil servants can prostitute their insider knowledge for private gain in their retirement years. The system for controlling this, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, was criticised by a Select Committee and reforms were suggested. That did not have an answer in two months; it has not had an answer in 22 months.

Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
584 c440
House
House of Commons

I am aware that the hon. Gentleman has an interest in the pre-appointment hearings issue, and I understand that the Minister for the Cabinet Office was questioned recently by the Public Administration Select Committee about the matter. I am pleased to report that the Cabinet Office has now submitted its response to the Committee.

Answered by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
584 c440
House
House of Commons

What recent guidance he has given to his ministerial colleagues about providing substantive responses to select committee reports.

Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
904797; 584 cc440-558
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for his question. I see it as part of my role to represent the House in the Government as well as to represent the Government in the House, so I will of course ask my right hon. Friend the Minister for the...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2014
Reference
578 c465
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend tell us what the point is of the Osmotherly rules? They require the Government to respond formally to Select Committee reports within two months of their publication, or six months at the very latest. It is with great regret that I must tell him that...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
27 March 2014
Reference
578 c464
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to agree the third report from the Procedure Select Committee on Private Members' Bills; Debates on Select Committee Reports (HL 63). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Sewel
Department
Chairman of Committees (HL); Procedure Committee (HL)
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Notes
Debated with Lords motion to agree the fourth report from the Procedure Select Committee on Speakers' Lists (HL 87).
Date
9 January 2014
Reference
750 cc1629-1630
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving this Motion, I will speak also to the fourth report of the committee.

The third report proposes the introduction of a ballot to determine the order in which Private Members’ Bills handed in on the day of State Opening receive their First Readings on subsequent days. At...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2014
Reference
750 c1629
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will say a few words about the fourth report—not the third one, but the one about speakers lists. I welcome the recognition by the Chairman of Committees and the Procedure Committee that there is a serious problem here, which is exacerbated by the increased number of Members...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2014
Reference
750 cc1629-1630
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I offer my support to the third report, which is the subject of the Motion moved by the Chairman. I fully support the idea that we should end the mad scramble for Private Members’ Bills after the State Opening of Parliament, which I was involved in at the...

Member
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2014
Reference
750 c1630
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Steel of Aikwood, on his little commercial, which is much appreciated by the House. Returning to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Hannay, I think it is important to understand that we have made great strides recently in increasing the...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2014
Reference
750 c1630
House
House of Lords