Skip to main content

1-20 of 44 results for subject:Separation

Year X
2014

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, more and more people now choose to live together before or instead of getting married or entering into a civil partnership. In 1996, there were fewer than 3 million people cohabiting in the United Kingdom. By 2013, the figure had almost doubled to 5.9 million. More cohabiting couples—about...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2068-2072
House
House of Lords

My Lords, a few months ago the Prime Minister announced that all government policies would be subject to a new family test: what impact would they have on relationship formation and breakdown? It is against those standards that I seek to assess the Bill. My conclusion is that it would...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2072-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Marks, for giving me the opportunity to speak on this important issue—but not, I should make clear, because I welcome the introduction of this Private Member’s Bill. On the contrary, I find the whole concept of validating cohabitation deeply problematic. I want...

Member
Lord Farmer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2074-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the opportunity to contribute to this debate.

From these Benches, we recognise the good intentions of the Bill. We recognise the desires to protect cohabitees in vulnerable situations and to protect children from hardship. As has been recognised, there are gaps in the law that can lead...

Member
Bishop of Sheffield (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2077-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is perhaps time for someone to speak in support of the Bill. I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Marks, on bringing it forward. Given the atmosphere that has so far been engendered since he spoke, it was brave of him to do so. I should like noble...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2079-2081
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is an enormous pleasure to follow the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss, who knows far more about this subject than I could hope to learn and speaks with great authority as, among other things, a former senior family judge. Like her, I should say straightaway that...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2081-2
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the noble Lord will allow me an intervention. On one side of the scales we have lawyers, not the public. The consultees who responded to the Law Commission who were members of the public were largely against this. Even the Supreme Court has a variety of views. On my...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2082
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the intervention, but it does not match the facts. Resolution, for example, indicated what it called,

“strong public support for change: almost 90% think that a cohabiting partner should have a right to financial provision on separation if the relationship has been either long-term, involved children, or...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2082-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am only intervening here to make sure that I understand what is going on, having heard the noble Lord’s expectation that the Labour Party is likely to take this through. If I remember correctly, when I was on the opposition Benches speaking for my side on the...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2083
House
House of Lords

That is absolutely right, but it was not this measure; it was civil partnership applying to both kinds of couples. The Government did not agree with that. I tried to press them and I failed. These provisions—

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2083
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2083
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may just finish. These provisions relate not to civil partnership but to limited cohabitation rights. During the lifetime of the Labour Government, we discussed my Bill and it was indicated to me by Labour that the Bill had come very late in the Session and was therefore unrealistic...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2083
House
House of Lords

I was not referring to the Bill that the noble Lord was trying to put through. I was referring to the Civil Partnership Bill, in which the cohabitation question had come up. At that time, the Labour Party had said no. It then said no to you when it said...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2083
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the advice about how I should vote. Since I will not have a vote, it does not make much difference.

I want to say something about British Muslims. It is a very important subject. There are 2.7 million British Muslims, I believe, in this country. There are...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2083-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that is a rather unfair comparison. Jewish marriages are carried out according to the law of this land. In fact, as far as I understand it, the Jewish orthodoxy insists that a couple get married according to the law of this land. I disapprove of the...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2084
House
House of Lords

I do not disagree with that as an aim, but I think I am more in favour of choice than the noble Baroness. The thing about the Bill—and about Jewish marriage law—is to encourage choice and protect vulnerable people. This does not force people into cohabitation. It does not force...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2084
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Lester, and the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss. I congratulate other noble Lords who have spoken in this debate, although I have to confess that I had a few moments of same-sex marriage déjà-vu, particularly

during...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2084-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank my noble friend Lord Marks for bringing forward the Cohabitation Rights Bill and providing a further opportunity to debate this important subject. As a

novice in these issues—and in marriage itself, with only 27 years under my belt, just over half the number of the...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 cc2086-8
House
House of Lords

My noble friend the Minister said that at this stage, the Government think that further work needs to be done. What does he have in mind, given that the Law Commission has given two reports and that the matter was first raised, I think, 12 years ago? We have had...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2088
House
House of Lords

We consider that the next Government, whoever they are, should undertake consultation and pre-legislative scrutiny to decide exactly where they want to go forward. We have not made any commitment on this matter. As far as the Bill is concerned, we do not consider that proper consideration has taken place.

It...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2014
Reference
757 c2089
House
House of Lords