1-20 of 46 results for subject:Subscriptions
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.213 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Subscriptions
- We searched for
- subject_t:Subscriptions OR subject_ses:93148
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the cost to her Department of providing check-off services for trade union contributions in each year since 2010.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the cost to her Department of providing check-off services for trade union contributions in each year since 2010.
An estimate of the recent cost of providing the check-off facility has been made. The cost was not significant. The Home Office decided to remove the check-off facility but cost was not given as a reason for doing so.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has of the cost of removing check-off contributions for trade unions in her Department.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has of the cost of removing check-off contributions for trade unions in her Department.
An estimate of the cost of removing the check-off facility in the Home Office has been made. The cost was not significant. The Home Office has not cited cost as a reason for removing the service.
What his policy is on the deduction of trade union subscriptions from payroll in the Civil Service.
What his policy is on the deduction of trade union subscriptions from payroll in the Civil Service.
The policy is delegated to individual Departments.
The policy is delegated to individual Departments.
The policy is delegated to individual Departments.
What his policy is on the deduction of trade union subscriptions from payroll in the Civil Service.
I am interested in the Minister’s response because I understand that the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has been writing e-mails and letters to other Secretaries of State, asking them not to write off. Will the Minister confirm whether that is correct, and will he make clear all correspondence between him and other Liberal Democrat Ministers concerning their opposition to this Tory attack plan on worker representation?
I am interested in the Minister’s response because I understand that the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has been writing e-mails and letters to other Secretaries of State, asking them not to write off. Will the Minister confirm whether that is correct, and will he make clear all correspondence between him and other Liberal Democrat Ministers concerning their opposition to this Tory attack plan on worker representation?
I can do no better than quote a member of the Public and Commercial Services Union—she is just identified as June—who said that direct debit is
“the easiest way of paying my union subs. You know then that it’s going to get paid because you’re not dependent on your employer taking it from your wages. I think it’s better.”
I agree with June.
I can do no better than quote a member of the Public and Commercial Services Union—she is just identified as June—who said that direct debit is
“the easiest way of paying my union subs. You know then that it’s going to get paid because you’re not dependent on your employer taking it from your wages. I think it’s better.”
I agree with June.
I can do no better than quote a member of the Public and Commercial Services Union—she is just identified as June—who said that direct debit is
“the easiest way of paying my union subs. You know then that it’s going to get paid because you’re not dependent on your employer taking it from your wages. I think it’s better.”
I agree with June.
I am interested in the Minister’s response because I understand that the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has been writing e-mails and letters to other Secretaries of State, asking them not to write off. Will the Minister confirm whether that is correct, and will he make clear all correspondence between him and other Liberal Democrat Ministers concerning their opposition to this Tory attack plan on worker representation?
Does my right hon. Friend agree that the relationship between trade unions and their members ought to be direct and not intermediated by the civil service?
Does my right hon. Friend agree that the relationship between trade unions and their members ought to be direct and not intermediated by the civil service?
As the PCS said in the document from which I quoted, check-off is an archaic way of operating that pre-dates the existence of bank accounts and direct debits. Most civil service unions use direct debits, not check-off, because they think that is the modern, direct way for an organisation to have a relationship with its members.
As the PCS said in the document from which I quoted, check-off is an archaic way of operating that pre-dates the existence of bank accounts and direct debits. Most civil service unions use direct debits, not check-off, because they think that is the modern, direct way for an organisation to have a relationship with its members.
As the PCS said in the document from which I quoted, check-off is an archaic way of operating that pre-dates the existence of bank accounts and direct debits. Most civil service unions use direct debits, not check-off, because they think that is the modern, direct way for an organisation to have a relationship with its members.
Does my right hon. Friend agree that the relationship between trade unions and their members ought to be direct and not intermediated by the civil service?
The Department for Work and Pensions estimated that the cost of ending check-off across Departments was £1 million. The Minister denies that, so will he tell the House exactly how much it will cost to implement what is a political attack by the Conservative party, rather than a policy worthy of Government?
The Department for Work and Pensions estimated that the cost of ending check-off across Departments was £1 million. The Minister denies that, so will he tell the House exactly how much it will cost to implement what is a political attack by the Conservative party, rather than a policy worthy of Government?
I am grateful to the hon. Lady for raising that point and she is completely correct to say that an official produced the figure of £1 million. However, when asked for the workings and calculations that underpinned that number they were unable to produce
them, and it turned out to be a completely fictional number. The correct calculation of the cost is more likely to be a negative number and a saving to the taxpayer, as well as being a measure that enables PCS to do what its members now prefer and have a direct relationship with them.
I am grateful to the hon. Lady for raising that point and she is completely correct to say that an official produced the figure of £1 million. However, when asked for the workings and calculations that underpinned that number they were unable to produce
them, and it turned out to be a completely fictional number. The correct calculation of the cost is more likely to be a negative number and a saving to the taxpayer, as well as being a measure that enables PCS to do what its members now prefer and have a direct relationship with them.
I am grateful to the hon. Lady for raising that point and she is completely correct to say that an official produced the figure of £1 million. However, when asked for the workings and calculations that underpinned that number they were unable to produce
them, and it turned out to be a completely fictional number. The correct calculation of the cost is more likely to be a negative number and a saving to the taxpayer, as well as being a measure that enables PCS to do what its members now prefer and have a direct relationship with them.
The Department for Work and Pensions estimated that the cost of ending check-off across Departments was £1 million. The Minister denies that, so will he tell the House exactly how much it will cost to implement what is a political attack by the Conservative party, rather than a policy worthy of Government?
The Paymaster General has reiterated his support for getting rid of check-off, even though the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has written to Departments saying that there could be legal costs associated with that. A leaked HMRC memo talks about marginalising the unions, which could lead to industrial action among civil service unions. Does that show that Ministers are playing irresponsible party politics with the trade unions, and that the right hon. Gentleman should abandon his plans to get rid of check-off?
The Paymaster General has reiterated his support for getting rid of check-off, even though the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has written to Departments saying that there could be legal costs associated with that. A leaked HMRC memo talks about marginalising the unions, which could lead to industrial action among civil service unions. Does that show that Ministers are playing irresponsible party politics with the trade unions, and that the right hon. Gentleman should abandon his plans to get rid of check-off?
It is always reassuring to find that the old truths turn out to be enduring and that Labour speaks for its paymasters, the trade unions.
It is always reassuring to find that the old truths turn out to be enduring and that Labour speaks for its paymasters, the trade unions.
It is always reassuring to find that the old truths turn out to be enduring and that Labour speaks for its paymasters, the trade unions.
The Paymaster General has reiterated his support for getting rid of check-off, even though the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has written to Departments saying that there could be legal costs associated with that. A leaked HMRC memo talks about marginalising the unions, which could lead to industrial action among civil service unions. Does that show that Ministers are playing irresponsible party politics with the trade unions, and that the right hon. Gentleman should abandon his plans to get rid of check-off?
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels his Department funds.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels his Department funds.
In response to Part A of the question “what magazine subscriptions his Department funds”.
The Department has no contracted provision to supply general magazines.
In response to Part B of the Question “what television channels his department funds”.
The National Offender Management Service funded The Life Channel in a limited number of Prisons in 2013/2014. This service provides broadcast programming that is aimed at reducing reoffending and cascading general health information to prisoners and visitors.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels his Department funds.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels his Department funds.
HM Treasury subscribes to the following magazines:
AGRA Facts
Banker
Commercial Motor Thu ,
Bloomberg Business Week
Commercial Motor Thu
Farmers Weekly Fri
Local Government Chron Fri
Motor Transport Thu
New Statesman Thu
Private Eye Wed F/N
Prospect
Spectator
Taxation Thu
Times Education Supp Fri
HMT does not subscribe to any subscription based TV channels.
In 2009/10 HM Treasury was spending £189,561.41 on periodicals and newspapers. In 2013/14, this was down by 66%
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels her Department funds.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels her Department funds.
a) The Library Service subscribe to 117 journals using the SwetsWise pan-government contract. This is the only centrally held information on journal or magazine subscriptions.
b) The Home Office pays for a monthly rental for Parliament TV Services in Millbank. This TV services carries live and archived coverage of all UK Parliament proceedings taking place in public, including debates and committee meetings of both Houses. The monthly amount for line rental is £1275.00 and the yearly amount for TV provision and maintenance is £1880.96 all figures excl VAT.
In addition, there are Sky boxes in 2 Marsham Street which only transmit free to air channels (so no subscription) such as Sky News, BBC News, Al Jazeera, Russia Today, France 24, BBC1,2 ITV, CH4, CH5 etc. Again, these channels are distributed to TVs within the building.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels her Department funds.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels her Department funds.
My Department funds the subscription to a weekly magazine entitled The Caterer to ensure industry standards on, for example, health and safety are adhered to. My Department does not subscribe to any television channels.
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels her Department funds.
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels her Department funds.
DFID’s communications team subscribes to following magazines:
The Economist: £136 per annum
The Spectator: £129 per annum
The New Statesman: £92 per annum
The New Scientist: £149 per annum
Private Eye: £28 per annum
Marketing Magazine: £155 per annum
PR Week: £99.50 per annum
PR Week Global: £119.50 per annum
A figure for magazine subscriptions across the entire Department cannot be compiled from our accounting records without incurring disproportionate cost.
Television channels are paid for via the Parliamentary feed. DFID pays £6,728.90 each year for maintenance of the Parliamentary TV system and £13,500 a year for rental of the telecomms link from 22 Whitehall to the Palace of Westminster.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels his Department funds.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels his Department funds.
The Scotland Office funds subscriptions to the following periodicals: The Scottish Farmer, The Economist, and Civil Service World. The Scotland Office does not pay any subscriptions to TV channels.
To ask the Attorney-General what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels the Law Officers' Departments fund.
To ask the Attorney-General what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels the Law Officers' Departments fund.
The Attorney-General's Department has a contract with the Parliamentary Television Service. The other Law Officers' Departments do not have any television subscriptions.
A table listing the online and print magazines subscribed to by the Law Officer's Departments has been deposited
in the Library of the House. HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate do not have any magazine subscriptions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels his Department funds.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what subscriptions to (a) magazines and (b) television channels his Department funds.
The spend analysis system in the Department does not have a specific category for magazine subscriptions.
In addition to paying the license fee, the Department subscribes to a House of Commons television service provided by Chubb Information Systems.