Skip to main content

1-20 of 131 results for subject:Exploitation

Year X
2015

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I. Tackling exploitation in the Labour Market: consultation. 51p. II. Consultation on draft language requirements for public sector workers Code of Practice. 11p.

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Consultation papers; Deposited papers
Date
13 October 2015
Reference
DEP2015-0795
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders (a) cautioned and (b) proceeded against in Magistrates' Courts have been found guilty and sentenced for human trafficking in (i) 2012, (ii) 2013 and (iii) 2014; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2015
Reference
7212
House
House of Commons

Programme (No. 3) motion relating to consideration of Lords amendments. Agreed to on question. Lords amendments. Lords amendment 72, disagreed to on division (276 to 209). Government amendments (a) to (c) made in lieu. Lords amendment 1, agreed to on question. Lords amendments 2-71 and 73-95 agreed to, with Commons...

Lead member
Karen Bradley
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 cc644-694
House
House of Commons

rose—

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c689
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 72.

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c645
House
House of Commons

As Members know, there has been considerable interest in the position of overseas domestic workers during debates on the Bill, both here and in another place. We have had excellent debates on this important issue. I am grateful to Members of both Houses for raising it, and I want to...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c645
House
House of Commons

I am immensely grateful to the Minister for those comments, and Mr Speaker was nodding in agreement—so much so that I hope he may actually call me to speak in the debate.

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c645
House
House of Commons

I look forward to hearing from the right hon. Gentleman, and it sounds to me as though you will be obliging with regard to that, Mr Speaker.

Holding anyone in slavery or servitude or trafficking them is an abhorrent crime, which this Government are determined to stamp out. Such abuse of...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 cc645-6
House
House of Commons

I applaud and understand what the Minister says about ensuring that those who enslave domestic servants should be given a life sentence. If that was to happen and the law enforcement agencies were to get involved with the employer, what would happen to the employee?

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c646
House
House of Commons

I shall address later in my remarks exactly what is envisaged through the amendment in lieu to give support specifically to people on an overseas domestic workers visa who are victims of slavery.

The Bill means that all victims of modern slavery will have major new protections such as the statutory...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c646
House
House of Commons

It is essential that we get this Bill on the statute book before the Dissolution of Parliament next week. Although the amendments coming from the other place, including amendment 72, have absolutely the right sentiment, does the Minister agree that it is vital that we ensure this legislation gets on...

Member
Henry Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c646
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his comments. He is right: we are at a very late stage and we want this Bill to become an Act of Parliament. We want the Modern Slavery Act, the first piece of anti-slavery legislation for 200 years, to be on the statute book....

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c646
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady emphasised that she wanted, through the Government amendment, to give additional protections to domestic workers, but in fact I think her amendment has either confused her or is designed to confuse the House, because it actually reduces the protections that exist under the national referral mechanism. Has...

Member
Fiona Mactaggart (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c646
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that the right hon. Lady has misunderstood the amendment. The protections available to all victims of modern slavery who go through the national referral mechanism will be available to victims who have come here on an overseas domestic workers visa. That includes the discretionary right to stay...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c647
House
House of Commons

The good progress in the Lords reflects the comments that were made in the Bill Committee. Will the Minister say a little more about the guidance and tell us what is going to happen on the ground to ensure that enforcement action will not be taken against overseas domestic workers...

Member
David Burrowes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c647
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend and the right hon. Member for Slough (Fiona Mactaggart) were strong and assiduous members of the Committee that scrutinised the Bill as it went through the House of Commons, which is when we started debating this issue. My hon. Friend is right to mention the guidance, and...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 cc647-8
House
House of Commons

Would not the Lords amendment effectively bring us back to the position that we were in in 2012, which is when the Government changed the immigration rules? My question to the Minister is why did they change the rules in the first place? Why could we not have kept them...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c648
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady will know that there was abuse under the old regime. We wanted to ensure that we were giving maximum protection to victims. I shall shortly give the House some information from the anti-slavery commissioner designate, who is quite clear about the abuse of workers that he saw...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c648
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for her answer, but I do not really understand why the rules were changed in 2012 if there was no proper evidence to enable them to be changed properly to give people protection. Why are we debating the issue now, three

years later? The...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c648
House
House of Commons

The evidence is not that it has made things worse. Kalayaan, the leading charity in this area, was getting 300 victims of slavery coming through its doors each year under the old system. The figure is now 60 a year.

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2015
Reference
594 c649
House
House of Commons