Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:Methane

Year X
2016

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Betts. I thank the Liaison Committee for granting this debate to my hon. Friend the Member for Tiverton and Honiton (Neil Parish).

Improving air quality is my top priority and I welcome the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee’s interest in...

Member
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2016
Reference
618 cc422-4WH
House
House of Commons

US satellite data show that 6% of methane from fracking is leaked through fugitive emissions. Given that methane is 86 times worse than CO2 for global warming over a 20-year timeframe, will the right hon. Gentleman support the Council of Europe’s call for the banning of fracking, or at least for a maximum of 0.1% fugitive emissions at the wellhead?

Asked by
Geraint Davies (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2016
Reference
618 c214
House
House of Commons

No, Mr Speaker. The Government took their decision to give a go-ahead to fracking after extensive consideration of both the economic and the environmental risks and opportunities involved. We are confident that fracking can be carried out in a way that is safe and does not harm the environment, but which also provides job opportunities for this country and makes us less dependent on the import of energy.

Answered by
David Lidington (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 December 2016
Reference
618 c214
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if he will make an assessment of the implications for his Department's policies in England of the conclusions of the report of Health Protection Scotland, entitled A Health Impact Assessment of Unconventional Oil and Gas in Scotland, published...

Asked by
Margaret Ferrier (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 November 2016
Reference
52814
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what information her Department holds on (a) how much methane gas an average shale gas drilling site releases into the atmosphere and (b) what technology reduces the amount of methane gas so released.

Asked by
Michelle Donelan (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 2016
Reference
22951
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the social and environmental impacts of the potential extraction of coal-bed methane on forests such as the Forest of Dean.

Asked by
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 cc1026-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as part of the 14th onshore oil and gas licensing round, Southwestern Energy Ltd was formally offered two petroleum exploration and development licences within an area encompassing the Forest of Dean, each earmarked for coal-bed methane development. A strategic environmental assessment was undertaken for all areas offered for licensing applications in that round.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1026
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the hydrogeology of the forest is complex. The former mine workings are flooded, and there are still freeminers working underground. Labour introduced environmental safeguards for the Infrastructure Bill, but those has been downgraded, disregarded or weakened. The assessment to which the Minister referred is regarded by many to be flawed and inaccurate. Have there been independent risk assessments into coal methane extraction that consider all health and environmental impacts that have been observed elsewhere and have been considered specifically in relation to the Forest of Dean? If so, have they been made public? I would be grateful if I could have a meeting with the Minister and his officials, together with some colleagues from the Forest of Dean, to discuss this further.

Asked by
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1026
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I have previously mentioned to the noble Baroness, I am very happy to have that meeting along with officials. The system is extremely robust; this is but the first stage in the process. Consents will be needed before anything can go forward—for planning, from the Environment Agency, along with scrutiny by the Health and Safety Executive, an access agreement with the Coal Authority and consent to drill from the Oil and Gas Authority.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1026
House
House of Lords

Can my noble friend confirm that any application for coal-bed methane extraction will be subject to a full and rigorous process, which will include receiving all independent reports, following the same process as other forms as methane extraction applications?

Asked by
Lord Hayward (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1027
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can certainly confirm that that is the process. Only one commercially running coal-bed methane extraction operation is going on at the moment, and there have been no issues since 2007, when it started, with regard to health and safety or contamination.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1027
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what evidence-based case is there for applying far less stringent environmental controls and protections to coal-bed methane than to hydraulic fracturing?

Asked by
Baroness Featherstone (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1027
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the process for coal-bed methane is essentially parallel with that for fracking. There are no separate considerations here—or in so far as they are separate, it is only because of the slightly different technology. Both have extremely robust systems. In addition, if fracking was involved where we have coal-bed methane, a separate system of protections and consents would be needed.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1027
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government rode rather roughshod over the environmental conditions that your Lordships’ House believed should be applied to fracking and responded by saying, “Oh well, in that case we’ll make sure that we protect areas of outstanding natural beauty and groundwater protection zones by doing it at 1,200 metres under those sites and no closer to the surface”. The coal seams in the Forest of Dean are at 450 metres from the surface, and many are much closer than that. Can the Minister confirm, or not, that the environmental restrictions that apply to fracking apply also to coal-bed methane extraction in the Forest of Dean—and, if not, what environmental protection conditions will apply? Was it wise to issue a licence when many of the environmental impacts had not been assessed in detail for this particular application until after the licence had been granted?

Asked by
Baroness Young of Old Scone (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1027
House
House of Lords

My Lords, coal-bed methane is not as deep as 1,200 metres. So, obviously, that is a separate consideration; we are not talking about fracking. In so far as there is fracking, if it is fracking in addition, there will be the additional protections that are available. But, as I have indicated, there are also planning consents, Environment Agency consents, Health and Safety Executive requirements, access agreements from the Coal Authority and consent to drill from the Oil and Gas Authority. We have a very effective, robust system of protections of which we can be proud.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1027
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Question raises a much broader issue, which concerns many people, about the protection both of the ancient forest lands and of the forestry estates. Could the Minister update your Lordships’ House on what progress has been made towards the appointment of the new

public forest body, which was the recommendation of the independent forestry report? If no progress has been made, what role is, for example, the Forestry Commission taking in protecting this land, which the public hold so dear and for which they have such great concern?

Asked by
Bishop of St Albans (Bishops (affiliation))
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1027
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am always grateful for people exaggerating my powers, but this is very much outside my brief in relation to forestry. I will ensure that the right reverend Prelate gets a full response on the subject, and I know that the Government take it seriously.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1028
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree that if this country had not switched to fossil fuels in the last couple of centuries, the Forest of Dean—and every other forest—would long ago have been cleared for fuel? I declare my energy interests as listed in the register.

Asked by
Viscount Ridley (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1028
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what I would say is that we, as a nation, must determine that we shall have secure energy, and energy that is not imported. If we do nothing about coal-bed methane or, more broadly, about fracking, by 2030 we will have to import 70% of our gas rather than the 45% that we import now.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1028
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what initial assessment she has made of the implications of the incident at Porter Ranch, California, for safety and engineering procedures and standards in the UK onshore unconventional gas extraction sector.

Asked by
Christian Matheson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 January 2016
Reference
21523
House
House of Commons