Skip to main content

1-20 of 140 results for subject:"Data processing"

Year X
2017

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I start by thanking noble Lords for their amendments, which bring us

back to the important issues around the use of automated processing in what is an increasingly digital world. I apologise if my smile was misleading, I was just very pleased to see the noble Baroness in...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2017
Reference
787 cc1579-1582
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the Framework for Data Processing by Government provisions in the Data Protection Bill on the Cabinet Office strategy to make better use of data.

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
HL3885
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
DEP2018-0028
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interests as set out in the register, in particular as a partner in the global commercial law firm DAC Beachcroft LLP and as chair of the British Insurance Brokers’ Association.

In debates on the Financial Guidance and Claims Bill, yesterday and on previous days, noble Lords...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
787 cc205-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a relatively narrow point and affects only a very small part of the Bill, but is still quite important. The amendments

in the group mainly cover the question of how the Bill can reach out to the question about anonymisation and how, or not, it plays...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
787 cc208-210
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at earlier stages of the Bill, the Minister and others have been at pains to stress the need to ensure that, whatever we finally do, the Bill should help to build trust between those who operate and accept data and those who

provide it—the data subjects. It is...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
787 cc221-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill creates a comprehensive and modern framework for data protection in the UK. The importance of these data protection standards continues to grow—a point that has not been lost on noble Lords, nor the Government. That is why the Government have tabled Amendments 185A, 185B, 185C and...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
787 c228
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 113A I will speak to Amendments 114A, 118A, 119A and 121A. Schedule 6 changes references to “the Union” to “the United Kingdom” and deals with the transposition between the GDPR and the applied GDPR as and when we move beyond Brexit.

The paragraphs to which these...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 c2043
House
House of Lords

I shall speak to Amendment 124Q and to a number of amendments in this group. I start with a general point. The number of amendments that we have tabled to Part 3 in particular, but also to Part 4, might suggest considerable opposition to the Bill, but I reassure the...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2054-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments is about data protection principles. Our Amendments 129G and 129H would add transparency to the requirements of lawfulness and fairness for processing. Here, the directive is again being reflected, but why, since transparency is a requirement in the case of the intelligence services? I...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2059-2060
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we debated automated decision-making under Part 2 on Monday. Clause 48 provides for automated decision-making in the case of law enforcement. No doubt we will return to the issues

raised on Monday in this connection, but for now, Clause 48(1) provides that a “qualifying significant decision” must be,

“required...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2070-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Clause 56 anticipates that competent law enforcement authorities may work together, and designates them as “joint controllers”. Clause 56(2) allows them to “determine their respective responsibilities”, although there is an exception when the responsibility is,

“determined under or by virtue of an enactment”.

Amendment 137A would, I suggest, take us...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 c2076
House
House of Lords

My Lords, under Clause 59, the controller must record certain information, including, according to subsection (2)(g),

“where applicable, details of the use of profiling”.

The purpose of Amendment 137B is to ask whether, if profiling is used, this is not applicable. My amendment would delete the words, but the Minister will understand...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2077-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, sensitive processing requires meeting at least one condition from the menu in Schedule 9 and one in Schedule 10. This could be achieved, for instance, because the processing is necessary to protect someone’s vital interests under Schedule 9, and for the same reason under Schedule 10 when consent...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2083-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 5, I will also speak to Amendment 6 which are both in my name. I will respond later to Amendment 115, which is in the same group but was tabled by other noble Lords. Amendments 5 and 6 are probing amendments to try to tease...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2017
Reference
785 cc1203-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall also speak to Amendments 13, 15 and 21. It is slightly putting the cart before the horse to deal with Amendment 11. I will do so since it comes earlier in the order, but it covers a rather less general issue than the less general amendments.

Under...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2017
Reference
785 cc1230-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, right from the outset, I had better declare that this is a probing amendment. I shudder to think of another chastisement from the noble Lord, Lord Ashton —that would be too terrible to contemplate. Chastisement from the noble Baroness? Even better.

The amendment is about whether we should put...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2017
Reference
785 c1186
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 October 2017
Reference
DEP2017-0603
House
House of Lords

I beg to move,

That this House has considered Exiting the European Union and Data Protection.

The digital revolution through which we are living is bringing about the fastest pace of change that any generation has ever seen. With advances in technology accelerating, it is likely that this current pace of change...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c498
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with the points that the Minister is making and the ambition he is setting out. Will he commit to securing an adequacy agreement from the EU so that the free flow of personal data, which he rightly says is important, can continue?

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c498
House
House of Commons