1-20 of 474 results for subject:Location
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.348 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Location
- We searched for
- subject_t:Location OR subject_t:Relocation OR subject_ses:91881
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union,what the (a) location is and (b) running costs are for each building used by his Department.
To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union,what the (a) location is and (b) running costs are for each building used by his Department.
The Department for Exiting the European Union is currently located in the following existing Government buildings:
9 Downing Street and 70 Whitehall;
MOD Main Building, Whitehall;
1 Horse Guards Road;
100 Parliament Street
The running costs for the 17/18 financial year to the end of November (excluding VAT) are:
9 Downing Street and 70 Whitehall - £682,550
MOD, Whitehall - £1,763,667
1 Horse Guards Road - £165,984
As of the end of November, no costs had been paid to HMRC for occupancy within 100 Parliament Street
These figures are in-line with the going market rates for rent and operation in Westminster.
When she plans to announce her decision on a new location for Channel 4.
When she plans to announce her decision on a new location for Channel 4.
We have been clear all along that this is a publicly owned broadcaster. Channel 4 must provide for and reflect the country as a whole. We are still in discussions with Channel 4 about how it should do this, including through relocating staff out of London, and we will set out next steps in due course.
We have been clear all along that this is a publicly owned broadcaster. Channel 4 must provide for and reflect the country as a whole. We are still in discussions with Channel 4 about how it should do this, including through relocating staff out of London, and we will set out next steps in due course.
We have been clear all along that this is a publicly owned broadcaster. Channel 4 must provide for and reflect the country as a whole. We are still in discussions with Channel 4 about how it should do this, including through relocating staff out of London, and we will set out next steps in due course.
When she plans to announce her decision on a new location for Channel 4.
Merry Christmas, Mr Speaker. Will the Secretary of State confirm that moving Channel 4 out of London would bring an approximate £600 million benefit to broadcasting, and that it is unacceptable that only four of the 120 commissioners of programmes for Channel 4 currently live outside London? There is an economic benefit, whether it is Salford, which I prefer, Birmingham, Sheffield or Leeds, and it should be done now.
Merry Christmas, Mr Speaker. Will the Secretary of State confirm that moving Channel 4 out of London would bring an approximate £600 million benefit to broadcasting, and that it is unacceptable that only four of the 120 commissioners of programmes for Channel 4 currently live outside London? There is an economic benefit, whether it is Salford, which I prefer, Birmingham, Sheffield or Leeds, and it should be done now.
I thought it was going to be a bid for Wrexham, so I am interested to hear the right hon. Gentleman’s views on other locations. There are many estimates of the benefit, but Channel 4 relocating out of London would have a clear benefit to the country. It is a publicly owned broadcaster and as such we expect it to deliver public benefits above and beyond commercial benefits, and that includes relocating out of London.
I thought it was going to be a bid for Wrexham, so I am interested to hear the right hon. Gentleman’s views on other locations. There are many estimates of the benefit, but Channel 4 relocating out of London would have a clear benefit to the country. It is a publicly owned broadcaster and as such we expect it to deliver public benefits above and beyond commercial benefits, and that includes relocating out of London.
I thought it was going to be a bid for Wrexham, so I am interested to hear the right hon. Gentleman’s views on other locations. There are many estimates of the benefit, but Channel 4 relocating out of London would have a clear benefit to the country. It is a publicly owned broadcaster and as such we expect it to deliver public benefits above and beyond commercial benefits, and that includes relocating out of London.
Merry Christmas, Mr Speaker. Will the Secretary of State confirm that moving Channel 4 out of London would bring an approximate £600 million benefit to broadcasting, and that it is unacceptable that only four of the 120 commissioners of programmes for Channel 4 currently live outside London? There is an economic benefit, whether it is Salford, which I prefer, Birmingham, Sheffield or Leeds, and it should be done now.
While I welcome the reports that Channel 4 will be employing more people and investing more money outside London, does my
right hon. Friend agree that to send the message that Channel 4 is an alternative broadcaster serving different audiences, its headquarters should not be in SW1?
While I welcome the reports that Channel 4 will be employing more people and investing more money outside London, does my
right hon. Friend agree that to send the message that Channel 4 is an alternative broadcaster serving different audiences, its headquarters should not be in SW1?
My right hon. Friend speaks with great experience and knowledge on this matter, and the House does well to listen to his wise words.
My right hon. Friend speaks with great experience and knowledge on this matter, and the House does well to listen to his wise words.
My right hon. Friend speaks with great experience and knowledge on this matter, and the House does well to listen to his wise words.
While I welcome the reports that Channel 4 will be employing more people and investing more money outside London, does my
right hon. Friend agree that to send the message that Channel 4 is an alternative broadcaster serving different audiences, its headquarters should not be in SW1?
Does the Secretary of State agree that, as Channel 4 is not a programme maker but only a programme commissioner, there is limited benefit in moving staff, and surely it should be the programme making that reflects the diversity of the country?
Does the Secretary of State agree that, as Channel 4 is not a programme maker but only a programme commissioner, there is limited benefit in moving staff, and surely it should be the programme making that reflects the diversity of the country?
This is one of the arguments that has been made about how Channel 4’s business model operates. We have seen what happened with the BBC’s move to Salford—although I accept that the BBC has a different business model. That creativity and clustering of talent has had benefit. One has only to look at the analysis of the amount of programming that is currently commissioned outside London to see that basing Channel 4 outside London could have significant benefits for those independent production companies that are not in SW1.
This is one of the arguments that has been made about how Channel 4’s business model operates. We have seen what happened with the BBC’s move to Salford—although I accept that the BBC has a different business model. That creativity and clustering of talent has had benefit. One has only to look at the analysis of the amount of programming that is currently commissioned outside London to see that basing Channel 4 outside London could have significant benefits for those independent production companies that are not in SW1.
This is one of the arguments that has been made about how Channel 4’s business model operates. We have seen what happened with the BBC’s move to Salford—although I accept that the BBC has a different business model. That creativity and clustering of talent has had benefit. One has only to look at the analysis of the amount of programming that is currently commissioned outside London to see that basing Channel 4 outside London could have significant benefits for those independent production companies that are not in SW1.
Does the Secretary of State agree that, as Channel 4 is not a programme maker but only a programme commissioner, there is limited benefit in moving staff, and surely it should be the programme making that reflects the diversity of the country?
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the (a) location is and (b) running costs are for each building used by his Department.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the (a) location is and (b) running costs are for each building used by his Department.
Please see the attached spreadsheet, which details the information requested.
This has been interpreted to be Core Defra occupations only, excluding its Executive Agencies & the Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBâs). Where buildings are part occupied, only the Core Defra proportion of total gross site costs are included.
We have reduced the number of buildings occupied by Core Defra from 29 to 26 since 2010. Running costs have fallen by a quarter, from £35,525,000 to £26,793,000 over the same period.
What assessment the Government has made of the effect on the UK economy of the (a) European Medicines Agency and (b) European Banking Authority relocating from London to other EU countries.
What assessment the Government has made of the effect on the UK economy of the (a) European Medicines Agency and (b) European Banking Authority relocating from London to other EU countries.
The decision to relocate the Agencies was one for the EU27.
We have consulted with industry and discussed issues specifically relating to the EBA and EMA as well as other issues and opportunities relating to the banking and life sciences sectors.
As part of the negotiations, we will discuss how best to continue cooperation in the fields of medicines and banking regulation.
And we are determined to ensure the life sciences sector continues to thrive and the UK’s leading position in financial services is maintained as we leave the EU.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he has any plans (a) to sell Hyde Park barracks and (b) to relocate the Household Cavalry and the location for state ceremonial and public duties in London.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he has any plans (a) to sell Hyde Park barracks and (b) to relocate the Household Cavalry and the location for state ceremonial and public duties in London.
The Ministry of Defence is investigating how best to deliver State Ceremonial and Public Duties in London. We are currently conducting detailed assessment studies to determine the best way forward.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the (a) location is and (b) running costs are for each building used by his Department., excluding operational bases.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the (a) location is and (b) running costs are for each building used by his Department., excluding operational bases.
A list of where Ministry of Defence buildings are located is attached.
The running cost for each building used by the Ministry of Defence is not held centrally.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the UK will continue to be involved in both clinical trials and the development of new medicines by the European Medicines Agency following its re-location to the Netherlands.
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the UK will continue to be involved in both clinical trials and the development of new medicines by the European Medicines Agency following its re-location to the Netherlands.
We recognise the important role that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) plays in the protection of human health.
In the negotiations, the Government will discuss with the European Union and Member States how best to continue cooperation in the field of clinical trials and medicines regulation in the best interests of both the United Kingdom and the EU. The Prime Minister has made clear that a key priority through the negotiations will be to ensure that the UK remains one of the best places in the world for science and innovation. Regardless of the outcome of those negotiations the UK is committed to offering a competitive service for clinical trial assessment.
Following the EMA's relocation to the Netherlands our aim is to ensure that patients in the UK and across the EU continue to be able to access the best and most innovative medicines and be assured that their safety is protected through the strongest regulatory framework and sharing of data.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how they intend to ensure that there will be no delay in accessing new therapies following the re-location of the European Medicines Agency to the Netherlands.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how they intend to ensure that there will be no delay in accessing new therapies following the re-location of the European Medicines Agency to the Netherlands.
We recognise the important role that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) plays in the protection of human health.
In the negotiations, the Government will discuss with the European Union and Member States how best to continue cooperation in the field of clinical trials and medicines regulation in the best interests of both the United Kingdom and the EU. The Prime Minister has made clear that a key priority through the negotiations will be to ensure that the UK remains one of the best places in the world for science and innovation. Regardless of the outcome of those negotiations the UK is committed to offering a competitive service for clinical trial assessment.
Following the EMA's relocation to the Netherlands our aim is to ensure that patients in the UK and across the EU continue to be able to access the best and most innovative medicines and be assured that their safety is protected through the strongest regulatory framework and sharing of data.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on the safety of clinical trials and new medicines of the European Medicines Agency's re-location to the Netherlands.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on the safety of clinical trials and new medicines of the European Medicines Agency's re-location to the Netherlands.
We recognise the important role that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) plays in the protection of human health.
In the negotiations, the Government will discuss with the European Union and Member States how best to continue cooperation in the field of clinical trials and medicines regulation in the best interests of both the United Kingdom and the EU. The Prime Minister has made clear that a key priority through the negotiations will be to ensure that the UK remains one of the best places in the world for science and innovation. Regardless of the outcome of those negotiations the UK is committed to offering a competitive service for clinical trial assessment.
Following the EMA's relocation to the Netherlands our aim is to ensure that patients in the UK and across the EU continue to be able to access the best and most innovative medicines and be assured that their safety is protected through the strongest regulatory framework and sharing of data.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, for what reasons no public announcement was made of his decision to co-locate the Holocaust Learning Centre with the Memorial in Victoria Tower Gardens.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, for what reasons no public announcement was made of his decision to co-locate the Holocaust Learning Centre with the Memorial in Victoria Tower Gardens.
In September 2016, the UK Government announced that designers and architects were being invited to enter an international design competition for a striking new national Memorial commemorating the Holocaust to be constructed in Victoria Tower Gardens.
The announcement made clear that competition entrants were also being invited to incorporate designs for a possible accompanying below-ground learning centre, which would be taken forward subject to technical, financial, planning or other constraints.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what estimate he has made of the number of businesses in the chemical industry considering relocating from the UK to the EU in the event that the UK does not remain part of the REACH system for authorising...
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what estimate he has made of the number of businesses in the chemical industry considering relocating from the UK to the EU in the event that the UK does not remain part of the REACH system for authorising...
The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy is working closely with the chemical industry to understand the impacts resulting from UK’s exit from the EU. We want to minimise the regulatory and market access barriers for UK businesses, including for those in the chemicals sector. We want to ensure that UK companies have the maximum freedom to trade with and operate within European markets – and to let European businesses do the same in the UK.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment his Department has made of the potential effect of the relocation of the European Medicines Agency on the future of the Novartis pharmaceutical (a) site and (b) production at that site.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment his Department has made of the potential effect of the relocation of the European Medicines Agency on the future of the Novartis pharmaceutical (a) site and (b) production at that site.
The Government is committed to ensuring a positive outcome for the whole life science sector that enhances competitiveness and builds on the success that we are rightly proud of, as we exit the European Union. Officials across government have been carrying out a programme of sectoral and regulatory analysis to identify the key factors for the life sciences sector that will affect our negotiations with the EU. Ultimately it is for the European Medicines Agency to comment on how it intends to operate from its new location, and what individual companies like Novartis might have to do differently.
My hon friend Richard Harrington (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy) has made the following written ministerial statement:
Nuclear power generation
New nuclear power stations have an important role to play. As confirmed in the Industrial Strategy, nuclear is a vital part of our energy mix, providing...
My hon friend Richard Harrington (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy) has made the following written ministerial statement:
Nuclear power generation
New nuclear power stations have an important role to play. As confirmed in the Industrial Strategy, nuclear is a vital part of our energy mix, providing...