Skip to main content

1-20 of 327 results for subject:Privatisation

Year X
2018

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

May we have a debate on the privatisation of the Forensic Science Service, following the scandal of 10,500 criminal cases that could have been affected by result-tampering at the private firm Randox Testing Services, based in Manchester, which the police have described as the worst evidence breach in living memory?

Member
Liz McInnes (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
651 c1016
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady raises an important point. It was quite a shock to see that report, and I think that all hon. Members will have been concerned about it. She is absolutely right to raise the matter, and she might like to seek an Adjournment debate so that she can...

Member
Andrea Leadsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
651 c1016
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
17 December 2018
Reference
HC 468 2017-19
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
19 November 2018
Reference
HC 468 2017-19
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the possible security implications for the UK of the privatisation of the ZTMC Titanium Mine in Ukraine.

Asked by
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2018
Reference
HL10745
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether his Department has any plans to privatise the British Business Bank.

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 September 2018
Reference
167880
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to contribute to this important short debate this afternoon. As has been said, for most of our constituents, this world of ICPs and various other acronyms is a bit of an enchanted forest or secret garden that they do not really understand—they just want their healthcare...

Member
Andrew Selous (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 cc169-171WH
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered the seventh report of the Health and Social Care Committee, Integrated care: organisations, partnerships and systems, HC 650, and the Government Response, Cm 9695. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Sarah Wollaston
Answering member
Steve Barclay
Department
Department of Health and Social Care; Health and Social Care Committee
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 cc159-182WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the Seventh Report of the Health and Social Care Committee, Integrated care: organisations, partnerships and systems, HC 650, and the Government Response, Cm 9695.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dame Cheryl. I thank all those who contributed to our...

Member
Sarah Wollaston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 cc159-160WH
House
House of Commons

We are very ably led by the hon. Lady on the Health and Social Care Committee. The Committee’s approach to the public was the right one, and I hope that, in its future communications with the public, the Department of Health and Social Care might learn that lesson about having...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c160WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady, my fellow Committee member, for her input. We on the Committee heard that there is a complex spaghetti of acronyms—STPs, ICPs, ACOs—and nobody knows what they mean. Even those working in the system struggle to keep pace with them and with the changes. We have...

Member
Sarah Wollaston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c160WH
House
House of Commons

I commend the hon. Lady for the way she is making her remarks on our report, which I welcome. I looked closely at the Government’s response, in which they said that they

“remain keen to consider how to build political consensus on the case for reform and funding as part of...

Member
Baroness Berger (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c160WH
House
House of Commons

I will respond further to the hon. Lady’s remarks when I comment on legislative change and how we can get legislative change through a hung Parliament. I will also comment on the importance of engaging with the service and why that needs to come bottom-up from the service, and the...

Member
Sarah Wollaston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c160WH
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Steve Barclay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c161WH
House
House of Commons

Coming back to why integrated care does not happen, there are many deeply ingrained structural divides. Since the inception of the NHS 70 years ago, we have had a system that is free at the point of use for the NHS, but means-tested for social care. That presents an extraordinary...

Member
Sarah Wollaston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c161WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Chair of the Committee for giving way. Does she agree that when there is an attempt to elicit change through turning off the financial tap, what happens in fact is that people cut what they think is easiest to cut, which is often the most...

Member
Philippa Whitford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c161WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for that intervention and for her own service to the Committee previously—she is very much missed. Her remarks are typical of the constructive input that she has always made to the health debate in emphasising the need to take the long view. Financial pressures so...

Member
Sarah Wollaston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 cc161-2WH
House
House of Commons

Like me, the hon. Lady was in Parliament when we went through the 2012 reforms. We had to have a period of pause because of the complexity of the

legislation. Pre-legislative scrutiny is absolutely essential and I wholeheartedly support what she has said as the Chair of the Committee.

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c162WH
House
House of Commons

Hon. Members know that a lack of proper pre-legislative scrutiny that responded to concerns expressed led to many of the barriers. We have to go back and address them when they could have been addressed in a more collaborative process during the passage of the Health and Social Care Act...

Member
Sarah Wollaston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c163WH
House
House of Commons

I would add a bit of clarification on that point about the size of private organisations that might become involved. My concern is that, irrespective of size—whether private organisations are big or small—the threat of a takeover happening within our NHS has distracted the debate. Anything that would categorically rule...

Member
Baroness Berger (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2018
Reference
646 c163WH
House
House of Commons