Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,075 results for subject:Pensions

Year X
2019

Type

+ Legislation (6) + Bills (2) + Public bills (2)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (4)
-
Statutory instruments (4)
+ Members' contributions (805)
-
Business questions (10)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (55)
-
Oral question time interventions (4)
+ Oral questions (60)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (8)
-
Proceeding contributions (686)
+ Parliamentary committees (26) + Committee proceedings (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (22)
+ Parliamentary papers (49)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (2)
-
Deposited papers (10)
-
House of Commons papers (23)
-
Impact assessments (12)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (27) + Debates (20)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (6)
-
Debates on bills (3)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (3)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Opposition days (1)
+ Statements (4)
-
Written statements (4)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Written corrections (2)
-
Ministerial corrections (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (256)
-
Business questions (10)
+ Oral questions (60)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (8)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (185)
+ Research briefings (4)
-
Commons Briefing papers (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Jesse Norman
Department
Treasury
Type
Annual reports; House of Commons papers
Date
19 December 2019
Reference
HC 8 2019-20
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress he has made on achieving equal treatment for the 150-300 war widows who receive no war widow bereavement benefits due to remarrying or cohabiting between 1973 and 2005; and when his Department plans to make a decision on reinstating the...

Asked by
Anne Milton (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 November 2019
Reference
7680
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many NHS practice nurses in England, after working in NHS GP practices across the country, have been excluded from the NHS pension arrangements available to other NHS staff; what estimate they have made of the pension such nurses would have accrued, on average, had they...

Asked by
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Dissolution answer.
Date
5 November 2019
Reference
HL426
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their estimate of how many NHS senior medical staff have been asked to pay extra tax as a result of their pension contributions exceeding the Tapered Annual Allowance in the (1) 2016–17, (2) 2017–18, and (3) 2018–19 tax years; and what was the average...

Asked by
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Dissolution answer.
Date
5 November 2019
Reference
HL427
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government recognise that pension tax may contribute to decisions by doctors to limit their NHS commitments. The NHS continues to work tirelessly to ensure that patients receive timely and appropriate care, so we are consulting on proposals to make the NHS pension scheme more flexible, so that doctors can continue to conduct vital NHS work while tailoring their pensions growth. The Treasury is also reviewing how the tapered annual allowance supports the delivery of public services such as the NHS.

Answered by
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c948
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her reply and draw attention to my interests in the register. This problem goes back to 2016 but, as of this week, the BMA, the doctors trade union, revealed that a recent survey showed that 42% of GPs have already reduced their hours spent caring for patients and 30% of hospital consultants have already reduced their hours. There have been similar figures from the Royal College of Physicians. Doctors are attracting massive tax bills as a result of working harder to care for their patients; indeed, half are now retiring younger. I am afraid that the appearance is of a dilatory Government where infighting between HM Treasury and the Department of Health is taking precedence over urgent action to deal with this problem. Will the Minister encourage the Government to get a move on and get this sorted out before even more patient time is lost?

Asked by
Lord Balfe (Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c948
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for that very direct question. Our estimate is slightly different—that around one-third of GPs and consultants have earnings high enough to potentially be affected by the tapering of the annual allowance for tax-free pension savings. Not all clinicians are affected—it depends on the personal circumstances—but we accept that there is a need for urgent action in this area. That is why NHS employers have published guidance for short-term approaches that could have a mitigating effect on pension tax for the workforce this year and throughout the winter. We have also opened our consultation, which will close this Friday. We have already had 750 responses to it, and stakeholders are broadly supportive of the additional flexibility that has been proposed. We intend that flexibility to be available by April.

Answered by
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c948
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for asking another direct question. The results of a recent survey carried out by the Royal College of Surgeons of nearly 1,900 surgeons were that 68% of consultant surgeons are considering early retirement because of the pension tax situation, 64% have been advised to work fewer hours in the NHS and 69% have reduced the amount of time they spend working in the NHS. What effect does the Minister think that might have on surgical care?

Asked by
Lord Patel (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c948
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is exactly right to raise this issue and we have taken it very seriously. I have met the president of the Royal College of Surgeons to take on board his concerns.

It is exactly why we have brought forward this consultation as a matter of urgency and why the department is making strenuous representations to the Treasury, which is reviewing the operation of the annual tapered allowance, and it is why we will continue to make those representations. However, it is also why we are taking other actions around elective surgery so as to reduce the pressure on surgeons up and down the country.

Answered by
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c948
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can urgent action be taken in respect of the doctors’ scheme without having an effect on other schemes of a similar nature?

Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c949
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is quite right. We must make sure that we do not undermine the important benefits of the tax relief on contributions. It is one of the most expensive reliefs in the tax system, costing around £50 billion, around 60% of which was claimed by higher and additional-rate taxpayers. We will expect any review that comes forward from the Treasury to be targeted. An evidence-based approach will be adopted where there is evidence that any problems with the pension tax are affecting the delivery of front-line services, as we have found with the specific group of high-paying clinicians.

Answered by
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c949
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness will be aware that the royal colleges are all sounding alarm bells, and she is probably also aware that all our doctors serving in the Armed Forces are affected by exactly the same tax hits. The whole NHS workforce is in crisis and we really cannot afford to lose highly trained clinicians. The problem has been known to the department for some considerable time. Can she tell us exactly when the Government expect there to be a sensible, workable solution?

Asked by
Baroness Jolly (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c949
House
House of Lords

As I said in an earlier answer, we are expecting the consultation proposals to be implemented in April. However, I reassure the noble Baroness that these proposals would also apply to clinicians working in the Armed Forces and in medical schools, provided they are in the NHS pension scheme. I hope she find that encouraging.

Answered by
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c949
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is not just a problem for the NHS; it applies across the public sector—to senior people in the police, the fire service, the Army and elsewhere. It is a problem of the Government’s making. It was the Government who put a limit on the size of people’s pension pots and this is the unintended consequence. We are losing the most experienced, dedicated people. It is a false economy. My noble friend answers for the Government as a whole, not just on the health service, and it is not good enough to say that the Treasury is considering this matter. It has been brought up time and again, and it is time for the Treasury to admit that it made a mistake that is costing the public service dear.

Asked by
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c949
House
House of Lords

As usual, my noble friend speaks with alacrity and force. It has been made quite clear by the Treasury that it will look at the

impact on front-line services across the system and not just in the NHS. I am of course speaking for the Department of Health and Social Care, but where sensible evidence is brought forward by other services, it will be looked at by the Treasury in its review.

Answered by
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c949
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is the Minister not aware that when she speaks from that Front Bench she speaks for the entire Government, not just for the department for which she works? Anybody speaking in this House as a Minister speaks for the whole Government. The noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, is entirely right: the idea that, although we know what the problem is, there will be no implementation until the spring is unacceptable. This has to be done much sooner than that.

Asked by
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c950
House
House of Lords

I apologise if I gave the noble Baroness the impression that there will be no action before the spring. NHS Employers has already published guidance for employers that would mitigate the effect of pension tax on their work force in this tax year. In addition, consultation is under way to allow measures to come into place in April. The Treasury is also looking at the effect of the allowance and taking further action with effect not just for NHS workers but for those who work across the public sector where there is evidence of an impact on front-line workers. I hope that that reassures the noble Baroness and the entire House.

Answered by
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 c950
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on patients of doctors having to curtail their hours because of the rates of tax they would incur due to the pensions regime in the National Health Service.

Asked by
Lord Balfe (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
800 cc947-950
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee reports (Government responses); Parliamentary committees
Committee
Work and Pensions Committee
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
HC 76 2019
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate her Department has made of the cost of uprating pensions for people who retired in EU27 states in 2018.

Asked by
Nigel Evans (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2019
Reference
2687
House
House of Commons