Skip to main content

1-20 of 123 results for subject:Iran

Year X
2025

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment she has made of the potential implications of her policies of the death of Somayeh Rashidi in Iran in September 2025; and what discussions she has had with her Iranian counterparts on taking steps to ensure...

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2025
Reference
85134
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what discussions she has had with her Iranian counterpart on the arrest of (a) Negar Misaghian and (b) Shakib Farzan; and what diplomatic steps she is taking to help ensure their release.

Asked by
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2025
Reference
85178
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what recent assessment she has made of the level of threat from Iran.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2025
Reference
82320
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Date
22 October 2025
Reference
HC 1405 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Laid by
Stephen Doughty
Department
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
30 September 2025
Reference
SI 2025/1052
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether he has had recent discussions with the Iranian authorities on attacks on the Baha’i community including the illegal obtention of property and assets; and what steps is he taking to ensure (a) their protection and (b) the...

Asked by
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 September 2025
Reference
74935
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps his Department is taking to help support (a) women and (b) political prisoners under threat from the Iranian regime.

Asked by
Anneliese Dodds (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 August 2025
Reference
67434
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Date
16 July 2025
Reference
HC 681 2024-26; HL 160 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Does the Secretary of State support the action taken by the United States to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities?

Asked by
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2025
Reference
770 c17
House
House of Commons

As I said in my response to the hon. Member for Surrey Heath (Dr Pinkerton), we are absolutely determined that Iran should never have a nuclear weapon. We have been working with allies, on a diplomatic path. Now that a ceasefire is in place, the mind of all NATO leaders, including President Trump, was on putting our weight behind that diplomatic path. That is the way towards ensuring a sustainable and verifiable end to any nuclear programme.

Answered by
John Healey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2025
Reference
770 c17
House
House of Commons

It is extraordinary that a British Secretary of State for Defence is unable to give his explicit support to the military action of our closest ally, the United States. Is the real reason why Labour cannot back US military action against Iran not the same as the reason why it will not U-turn on Chagos or on Northern Ireland veterans—that when it comes to choosing between legal theory and the national interest, this Prime Minister is a lawyer, not a leader?

Asked by
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2025
Reference
770 c17
House
House of Commons

Absolute rubbish! The UK and the US are the very closest of defence, intelligence and national security partners. The US was strongly behind the deal we have done on Diego Garcia, because it knows that that deal secures the operational sovereignty there of the UK and the US for the next 100 years and beyond.

Asked by
John Healey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2025
Reference
770 c17
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Notes
Debated with motions to consider the National Security Act 2023 (Foreign Activities and Foreign Influence Registration Scheme: Publication) Regulations 2025, National Security Act 2023 (Foreign Activities and Foreign Influence Registration Scheme: Specified Persons) (Iran) Regulations 2025 and National Security Act 2023 (Foreign Activities and Foreign Influence Registration Scheme: Specified Persons) (Russia) Regulations 2025.
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 cc118-132GC
House
House of Lords

: My Lords, I am grateful to the Committee for allowing us to debate the four regulations relating to the foreign influence registration scheme as a single unit, but if noble Lords wish to discuss individual matters relating to them then we can do so. I know that, before I...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 cc118-120GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not detain the Committee for long. I am in favour of the foreign influence registration scheme and I well remember when the Act went through the House in 2023. I support the transparency that my noble friend the Minister talked about, and I hope that this...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 cc121-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister for bringing these SIs to the Grand Committee. Like my noble friend, I shall speak briefly about one or two points, in my case, specifically about Iran and the provisions that apply to Iran and, more specifically, about the effectiveness of...

Member
Lord Cryer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 c122GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Cryer. I have a high level of sympathy with the points that he raised. Indeed, when we discussed the Iran sanctions regime in Grand Committee, many of those arguments were made and made powerfully. I hope that the...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 cc122-5GC
House
House of Lords

: My Lords, these four draft regulations represent the next step in operationalising the foreign influence registration scheme established under Part 4 of the National Security Act 2023, a piece of legislation introduced by the previous Conservative Government. I am sure that the Minister will be pleased to hear that...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 cc124-6GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has obviously made a decision that, even though China is not on the enhanced tier, Confucius institutions, Chinese pension funds and Chinese state funds will now be exempted. I assume that the Conservatives support that.

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 c126GC
House
House of Lords

Indeed—I think I will cover that point as I go along.

Although we support the intent and scope of these measures, scrutiny must not end there. These regulations are not purely technical instruments; they go to the heart of how the UK responds to evolving and increasingly sophisticated state threats. It...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 cc126-7GC
House
House of Lords