Skip to main content

1-20 of 85 results for subject:Leisure

Year X
2025

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 10 December to Question 97661 on Business Rates: Tax Allowances, how many and what proportion of the ratepayers who will see no increases were eligible for Retail, Hospitality and Leisure relief in 2025-26.

Asked by
Daisy Cooper (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2025
Reference
99813
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Steve Reed
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
This Statutory Instrument has been made in consequence of a defect in SI 2025/1315.
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
SI 2025/1322
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Steve Reed
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
SI 2025/1315
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Laid by
Dan Tomlinson
Department
Treasury
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 October 2025
Reference
SI 2025/1093
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

My Lords, I think we have all agreed that the Bill is tinkering with what is essentially a broken system. The Labour Party clearly knew that because it pledged in its manifesto to reform the system, so it understands that the system is broken. Speaking to the last group, the...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc536-7GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Scott of Bybrook

46: After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—

“Review of impact on businesses, high streets and economic growth

(1) The Secretary of State must review the impact of sections 1 to 4 of this Act on—

(a) businesses,

(b) high streets, and

(c) economic growth.

(2) The review must consider—

(a) the...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c529GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 46 I will also speak to my Amendments 53 and 54, which are all borne from the lack of detail in the Bill and the failure to publish an impact assessment for its first four clauses. The Government are asking us to agree to a...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc529-530GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we have heard from the noble Baroness, Lady Scott, this group is about understanding the impact of the Bill. To help us focus on why this is important, my noble friend Lady Pinnock and I have produced our own notional one-dimensional impact assessment.

If a property had a...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc530-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will add a few words on this important group of amendments. It is not possible to do an impact assessment at the moment. This has been rushed, and the new valuation list will not be completed for another three or four months. Non-domestic rates are the third-highest...

Member
Lord Thurlow (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc531-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments seek to introduce a number of provisions into the Bill requiring reports and assessments of various types. They are concerned with the impact on the RHL—retail, hospitality and leisure—sector, including on local government revenues, businesses more generally and economic growth. Some reports and assessments would be...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc532-4GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, could I point out that these forecasts are all going to be hypothetical? In five months’ time, the VOA will produce, or have access to, the updated new rateable values nationwide. Current rateable values will be history. Therefore, we have to anticipate what those might...

Member
Lord Thurlow (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c534GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for making that point. He also talked about delays, which I will pick up in a later group when we talk about implementation; I have not forgotten about the important points he raises. On the point he just made, the Budget analysis takes into account...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c534GC
House
House of Lords

I did not quite understand that point. The Minister is saying that the revaluation has already been taken into account in the figures that the Treasury is coming forward with. Does that mean he can share the revaluation with us?

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c534GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, let me clarify this for the noble Lord. As I said repeatedly on day one in Committee, the Treasury will publish an analysis when it sets its multipliers at the Budget, but the work that is going on in providing that analysis will consider all the issues, in...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c534GC
House
House of Lords

It seems to me that the Government have done an impact assessment; if it is not an impact assessment, it is an analysis that may or may not be an impact assessment. The Minister is saying that he has some data but is not prepared to let us have it,...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c534GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think I have been quite clear in stating that there is clear evidence that there is no impact assessment on taxation. However, what we are asking to do in the Bill is to set

the parameters for increasing the multiplier and the flexibility for the higher rate...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c534GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to labour the point. This may sound rude but it is not supposed to be. Given that the Treasury seems to be driving almost all of this, could we please have a Treasury Minister here, as well as the noble Lord, on Report? It would make sense...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c535GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I take everything that the noble Lord says in a good spirit; I will come back to him on that point. Let me be clear on the remit of the Bill. On when the Treasury will set its multipliers, I understand the noble Lord’s point, but I will...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c535GC
House
House of Lords

I too do not wish to labour the point but, if I understood him correctly, the Minister said that the ministry already has access to the new valuation list. Yet Colliers, a leading firm of rating surveyors with which I have had extensive discussions on this Bill, assures me that...

Member
Lord Thurlow (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c535GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I say directly again that the 2026 revaluation has not yet been completed but, obviously, the Treasury is working on it. It is having conversations with all stakeholders, of course. In fact, it is probably also looking at forward planning on the whole future of business rates. As...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c535GC
House
House of Lords