Skip to main content

1-20 of 394 results for house:"House of Lords"

Year X
2026
Subject X
Infrastructure

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Infrastructure (394)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government which Accelerated Strategic Transmission Investment projects they expect to be completed by 2030.

Asked by
Lord Udny-Lister (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2610
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many megawatts of transmission connection projects in the Transmission Entry Capacity register have been completed to date, out of the total capacity currently in the queue.

Asked by
Lord Udny-Lister (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2612
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what Ofgem’s original policy limit was for Early Construction Funding as a proportion of total project cost, and what steps they are taking to ensure this limit is enforced.

Asked by
Lord Udny-Lister (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2611
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what proportion of Transmission Entry Capacity projects due for delivery by 2030 do not yet have a corresponding entry in the Transmission Works Report.

Asked by
Lord Udny-Lister (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2614
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many transmission connection projects in the Transmission Entry Capacity register have been completed to date, out of the total number currently in the queue.

Asked by
Lord Udny-Lister (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2613
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that communities affected by multiple nationally significant infrastructure projects are protected by coordinated mitigation efforts, kept informed about the cumulative impacts of projects, and have opportunities to co-create mitigation measures with developers.

Asked by
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 August 2026
Reference
HL2278
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Amendment to regret debated and withdrawn. Original motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Answering member
Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1173-1187
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980 sets out that the Secretary of State may designate an urban development area where they are of the opinion that it is expedient and in the national interest, and following a public consultation. Between 4 February and 1 April 2026,...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1174-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 c1176
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for introducing the order and setting out so clearly what the Government are seeking to achieve. I have tabled a regret amendment, not because I oppose the establishment of the Greater Cambridge Development Corporation but because I think what is in the...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1176-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for setting out the case for the Greater Cambridge Development Corporation. Unavoidably, it sounded like something out of the 1970s, rather than something fit for the 21st century.

It is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, although my perspective is very different...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1177-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I note the criticisms of the new development corporation for Cambridgeshire, as spelled out by the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, from his expert local knowledge, but my comments are from the broader policy perspective. The use of the development corporation model represents a huge opportunity up and down...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1179-1180
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with permission, I will express a few thoughts, and I speak as chancellor of the University of Cambridge. I welcome the establishment of the Greater Cambridge Development Corporation. It will, quite simply, speed things up and cut through bureaucratic delays.

We need to acknowledge the growth potential of our...

Member
Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1180-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, development corporations have been widely welcomed—with one exception—because they have an important function in enabling development decisions that cover a wide area. So, the question for us is not the about principle of development corporations, but whether the Greater Cambridge devco is the most effective vehicle for achieving...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1181-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I make the House aware of my potential interest as a councillor in central Bedfordshire, which neighbours this area. I support my noble friend Lord Lansley in his amendment. I was going to say how important Cambridge is to the economy of the UK, but I think the...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1182-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have taken part in a very interesting debate on the future of Cambridgeshire and the Greater Cambridge Development Corporation. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, for his contribution to Cambridge. We had a visit there and I could see his involvement...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1183-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to all noble Lords who took part in this really interesting, albeit short, debate. We have to understand that this is the first of what will necessarily be further debates at some point later in the autumn in relation to the order setting out...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1184-7
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the contribution that accelerated infrastructure delivery could make to increasing the United Kingdom’s long-term growth rate above the Office for Budget Responsibility’s forecast.

Asked by
Baroness McGregor-Smith (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 2026
Reference
HL1917
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the resilience of artificial intelligence research infrastructure in extreme weather events.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 2026
Reference
HL1706
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the resilience of computing infrastructure supporting critical national infrastructure in the UK against (1) remote disablement, or (2) restriction, by an entity based outside the UK.

Asked by
Baroness Berger (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
HL2176
House
House of Lords