Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for dept:"Ministry of Defence"

Department X
Home Office
Member X
Lord Faulks

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Faulks, Lord (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Moved by

Lord Faulks

34: After Clause 6, insert the following new Clause—

“Treason: aiding a hostile State or organisation

(1) A person commits a treason offence if, with intent to aid—

(a) a terrorist attack on the United Kingdom by any State or organisation, or

(b) any State or organisation that intends to mount a...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1373-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment in my name and those of my noble friends Lord Hodgson and Lord Bethell is to add an offence of treason to the Bill. The offence of treason, or high treason, has a rather chequered history, I readily admit. The 1351 treason offence remains on the...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1374-6
House
House of Lords

It does not, which is why I was expressing regret at the final form of the amendment. If we are to return to this amendment, I shall seek perhaps to expand its scope—I hope not having an undue squabble with the authorities—so that it comes squarely within what the noble...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1376-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who participated in the debate, including those who put their names to the amendment. There were some interesting diversions via the prosecution of William Joyce; whether he was correctly convicted is a matter for considerable debate many years afterwards. In fact,...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2018
Reference
793 c1383
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness has indicated to the House that she speaks, in effect, on behalf of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, and we are all grateful for its report. Can she help the House in that context with one thing? The Joint Committee on Human Rights, of course, has...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2018
Reference
793 c1132
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2018
Reference
793 c1138
House
House of Lords

I understand what my noble friend says about Amendment 5 but I am little puzzled by why suggesting that a proscribed organisation should cease to be proscribed is supportive of a proscribed organisation. It is one thing to say that proscription should cease; it is another to be supportive of...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2018
Reference
793 c1138
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I accept entirely that it is better, if at all possible, to clarify what constitutes not so much a defence but in which circumstances there will not be an offence, which I think is the way Amendment 17 is framed. If I understand it correctly, the answer to...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1180-1
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Lord help the Committee by saying what legislation they would be committing an offence under?

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2018
Reference
793 c1184
House
House of Lords

I am not sure about that, and I am grateful to the noble Lord for assisting. There is, of course, a Treason Act of 1351, but that is not often relied on—or not at all relied upon. The noble Lord may be right, but I was genuinely inquiring what legislation...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2018
Reference
793 c63
House
House of Lords