Skip to main content

1-20 of 479 results for subject:Devolution

Department X
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (479)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what discussions he has had with the devolved administrations on implementation of the Apprenticeship Levy.

Asked by
Kirsty Blackman (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 2016
Reference
905554
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, with reference to his Department's White Paper, Success as a knowledge economy: teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice, published on 16 May 2016, what discussions he has had with the devolved administrations on the effect of the establishment...

Asked by
Gordon Marsden (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 May 2016
Reference
38082
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House notes with concern the Business, Innovation and Skills Department's proposal to close its Sheffield policy office, moving 247 posts to London; further notes that the Sheffield BIS office proposal runs counter to the Government's welcome commitment to create a public sector that reflects the...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c415
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making the central point of our argument. I would like to make the point that it is not just jobs in Sheffield that are at stake. Although the numbers are smaller, jobs in Darlington are being moved to London, too, which makes absolutely no sense.

Member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c415
House
House of Commons

I very much share my hon. Friend’s sentiment that there are many benefits derived from locating jobs outside London. These include cost benefits and the enrichment of decision-making by involving people located around the country in administering government and advising the Government. My hon. Friend made a very important point.

When...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc415-6
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making an excellent financial case to show why this change should not happen. The BIS office at Billingham in my constituency is not a headquarters, but it lies three miles from the constituency of the Minister responsible for the northern powerhouse. What kind of message does...

Member
Alex Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c416
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very important point, and he will not be surprised to learn that I shall come back to the point a little later in my contribution.

The Government say, quite understandably, that they want to save money, but we have done the maths from the limited information...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc416-7
House
House of Commons

Many of my constituents work for the Insolvency Service. At a time when there is a steel crisis, BHS has collapsed and other businesses are becoming insolvent, one would think that the Government would want to retain staff with expertise in insolvency, yet 153 jobs are at risk. Does my...

Member
Jo Stevens (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c417
House
House of Commons

I do indeed, and I think that other Departments are recognising that problem. For example, the Department for Education is trying to take some of the Sheffield-based BIS staff into its headcount because it is so worried about the loss of institutional expertise in respect of the programmes and the...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c418
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing the debate. As he will know, not only has the Department for Education made it clear that it does not think it is for the good of education policy to move all staff to London, but it shares a building with BIS staff....

Member
Caroline Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c418
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for her question, and for her robust questioning of the permanent secretary at the Public Accounts Committee. She is absolutely right to say that this sends out the wrong message. When we raised this matter with the permanent secretary, he pointed out that there...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c418
House
House of Commons

I am really interested in this idea of policy people having to be at the centre. The Department argues that the move will bring BIS policy operations closer to Ministers and contribute to the huge saving of £350 million of running costs. However, the “Government’s Estate Strategy” states:

“With modern IT,...

Member
Alex Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c418
House
House of Commons

I do indeed. I would simply reflect that this is the Department responsible for innovation. It is supposed to lead on creative thinking and thinking outside the box.

I worry, as do colleagues, that proper consideration has not been given to better options. The Department set itself an ambitious cost-saving strategy...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc418-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making an excellent speech. Should not part of the process he has just outlined involve proper consultation with the relevant trade unions?

Member
Chris Stephens (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c419
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an important point. We saw a process of consultation, which concluded on 2 May. The trade unions, working with the affected staff, have put in some substantial submissions and alternative proposals, and I shall be seeking reassurances from the Minister that they will be properly considered...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c419
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree with me, a London MP, that centralisation and the relocating of staff presents a problem for London? It leads to congestion, more overheating, incredibly expensive accommodation, and so on. Most graduates cannot afford to rent in London, let alone buy their own property.

Member
Ruth Cadbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c419
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an important point. No one wants this to be seen as a north versus south issue. The proposal flies in the face of logic for both north and south. It makes no sense to add to the overheating in London, so we share a common agenda...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc419-420
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Sheffield Central (Paul Blomfield). He made a coherent speech, and I congratulate him on leading the charge on this whole issue.

Unlike the hon. Gentleman, I do not have a direct constituency interest in the matter. My interest came about because...

Member
David Mowat (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc420-2
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making a very coherent case. When my constituents hear the phrase “northern powerhouse”, they ask what it means. We tell them that it means transferring powers, responsibilities and decision making out of London and to the regions, but they then say, “But why are you taking...

Member
Clive Betts (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c422
House
House of Commons

It is not for me to answer that intervention, but I would say that the answer is yes. In all fairness, the northern powerhouse is about more than public sector investment and civil service jobs; it is also about private sector investment. When the time comes to say whether the...

Member
David Mowat (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc422-4
House
House of Commons