Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for member:"Lord Hannay of Chiswick"

Department X
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Subject X
Voting rights

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Foreign and Commonwealth Office (15)

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Voting rights (15)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for giving way. I honestly think these so-called precedents which she has brought to the House to show it can be done ignore one really rather important point. She is probably in a similar position to the Prime Minister—that nothing is excluded...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1201
House
House of Lords

I was startled to hear the noble Lord, Lord Hamilton, give as a reason the way in which names are produced. It is entirely true that it normal practice to use alphabetical order for names and for names of countries, but it is not so for verbs—and

these are two...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1205
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my name is on an amendment similar to the one introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Tyler. I agree with him in saying that the amendments seek to achieve the same objective by the same method.

6.30 pm

The noble Lord made it clear, and I would make it clear,...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 cc1218-9
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl has made some very moving points about various aspects of the vulnerability of young people, but does he not accept that the matter we are debating now, which is whether or not they should have a vote in one referendum between now and the end of 2017,...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1227
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the noble Lord could help a little on this. He is advancing, as always, a highly sophisticated presentation of a totally negative point of view on giving the vote to 16 and 17 year-olds, but he is a member of a Government who held the door open to give...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1238
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Hannay of Chiswick

10: Clause 2, page 2, line 7, after “at” insert—

“(i) ”

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1243
House
House of Lords

We are in a rather peculiar situation. The noble Lord intervened in my speech and is now making a speech all of his own.

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1244
House
House of Lords

Okay, I think the noble Lord was intervening in my speech and, if he had listened carefully to what I said, he would have heard that I most particularly noted that the parallels with other members are not very apt because nobody has ever voted to leave the European Union—nobody...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1244
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Hamilton, and the noble Viscount, Lord Ridley, before him, used the argument of whether we would all be supporting this if these people were all going to vote no. I am afraid that his question reveals his own motive—to stop these people getting the vote just...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1247
House
House of Lords

This situation is completely different. In the case of the Danish and Irish referendums, had those negative results been upheld, the only consequence would be that a treaty called Maastricht or Lisbon would not have come into force. Nobody would have had any rights, privileges or advantages removed from them....

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1250
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the Minister for having responded in such a thoughtful way to this amendment, although I have to say that in earlier parts of his statement, I thought he was tempted back again to the reductio ad absurdum he employed on the previous group of amendments....

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 cc1260-1
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Lord is doing a little selective quotation from the views of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Goldsmith, who in his report said that the franchise should not be removed from anyone who has it. Would the noble Lord like perhaps to enlighten the House to...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1262
House
House of Lords

What I am asking is what you mean.

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1262
House
House of Lords

I honestly think that the noble Lord is treating in a very light-hearted fashion an extremely serious matter. I have had quite a lot of dealings with the Irish dimension in the context of the Government’s repatriation of some justice and home affairs legislation. If the noble Lord does not...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1268
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the purpose of this amendment, which is relatively incomprehensible if you look at it, and others in the same group is to provide that the electorate for the referendum should include EU citizens resident in the United Kingdom, the sort of electorate who vote in local elections in...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 2015
Reference
765 c1243
House
House of Lords