Skip to main content

1-20 of 126 results for subject:Business

Department X
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (126)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that this House has considered the redevelopment of Chatham Docks Basin 3. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Kelly Tolhurst
Answering member
Matthew Pennycook; Lee Rowley
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 cc111-128WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the redevelopment of Chatham Docks Basin 3.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Philip.

The debate over the future of Chatham docks has stirred strong emotions in our community. On one side, Peel Waters has proposed a residential-focused mixed-use development,...

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c111WH
House
House of Commons

Sir Philip, is it not normal to declare interests at the start of a debate? Is the right hon. Lady intending to make any such declarations?

Member
Neil Coyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c111WH
House
House of Commons

I am not too sure what the hon. Gentleman refers to.

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c111WH
House
House of Commons

Sir Philip, you may wish to explain the rules—but I think it is a requirement that where we have interests in a particular area, or a potential financial interest, we declare them before we comment on or speak to that issue. I again invite the right hon. Member to make...

Member
Neil Coyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c111WH
House
House of Commons

I would like the hon. Gentleman to elaborate on which financial interest he thinks I have.

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c111WH
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Sir Philip.

The dockyard has stood proudly for 457 years as a symbol of Medway’s economic backbone and our local heritage. On the banks of the River Medway, the docks embody the spirit of our community, connecting us to our past while paving the way to our future. Generations...

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c112WH
House
House of Commons

Am I right in thinking that ArcelorMittal is the only tenant in basin 3 that has not agreed to relocate?

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c112WH
House
House of Commons

My understanding is that there are other organisations operating within the port facility that want to stay where they are. Some have relocated because they unfortunately did not have another option; their leases meant that they were unable to stay.

The operations at Chatham docks span a diverse range of high-value...

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 cc112-3WH
House
House of Commons

Two of the companies that have been operating in Chatham docks for marine repairs are EAPL and Stick-Mig Welding. Does the right hon. Lady have anything to say about the relationship between Skipper Ltd and those two companies?

Member
Neil Coyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c113WH
House
House of Commons

I think the hon. Gentleman is referring to Skipper (UK) Ltd, which I am still a director of—and which has no customers or interests in Chatham docks or any of the businesses that operate in Chatham docks.

A sometimes overlooked aspect of the incumbent operations at Chatham docks is the strong...

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 cc113-4WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Lady is being generous in giving way, which I appreciate, so that I can better understand the specifics of the case. My understanding is that the local plan has not been updated since 2003. Can she give us her view on why that is the case? Why...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c114WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his comments. He is right that Medway Council is out of a local plan. The previous local plan, which is occasionally referred to regarding planning applications, clearly designates Chatham docks as a commercial rather than residential area—hence my campaign, with others across the Medway...

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c114WH
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend agree that, with these important sites, it is crucial to respect the character of the surrounding area in deciding what is to be built? In particular, there is a need for larger family homes, but many developments of this sort seem focused almost entirely on...

Member
Theresa Villiers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c114WH
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is right that one concern around developments such as this is that the focus is on number and units of flats, as opposed to delivering the type of accommodation that local people in the Medway towns desire in the locations. The numbers are a challenge, but...

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 cc115-8WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Sir Philip. I congratulate the right hon. Member for Rochester and Strood (Kelly Tolhurst) on securing this important debate. I know that a great many of her constituents value

immensely the contribution that Chatham docks has made to Medway...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 cc118-9WH
House
House of Commons

Many of my constituents are really worried about the statement by the Leader of the Opposition that he proposes to ignore the views of local communities in determining what gets built. Will the shadow Minister distance himself from those comments?

Member
Theresa Villiers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c119WH
House
House of Commons

We certainly will not ignore the views of residents when it comes to planning proposals. However, it is fair to say—this is partly why I find the yimby/nimby debate incredibly reductive—that there is a core of people in the country who do not want development—

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c119WH
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c119WH
House
House of Commons

I will answer the previous intervention, then I will happily give way.

There is a core of people in the country who do not want development of any kind near them under any circumstances, and we have to take those people on and do so with conviction. There is a much...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
749 c119WH
House
House of Commons