Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for member:"Lord Coaker"

Department X
Advocate General for Scotland
Subject X
Afghanistan

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Afghanistan (22)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords consideration of Commons amendments and reasons. Lords amendment 1B not insisted on and amendment 1D in lieu agreed to on division (258 to 233). Lords amendments 3B and 3C not insisted on and amendment 3E as an amendment in lieu of amendment 3C agreed to on division (266 to...

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Stewart of Dirleton
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office; Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Debates on bills
Date
16 April 2024
Reference
837
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2024
Reference
837 c888
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was interested to listen to the Minister’s remarks, and I thank him for the introduction, but let me say why we think that the amendment that I have put forward to your Lordships now is still so necessary.

The Minister just asserts that domestic law will be obeyed,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2024
Reference
837 cc888-890
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that reply, but it does not satisfy me. I wish to test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2024
Reference
837 c894
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to say how much I support the remarks of the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss, with respect to slavery, and my noble friend Lady Lister’s comments with respect to children. We will also support the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, on his amendment,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2024
Reference
837 cc909-910
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons reasons. Lords amendment 1 not insisted on and amendment 1B in lieu agreed to on division (271 to 228). Lords amendment 2 not insisted on and amendment 3B in lieu agreed to on division (285 to 230). Lords amendment 3 not insisted on and amendment 3C...

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Stewart of Dirleton
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office; Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Debates on bills
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c209
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his introduction to this debate in your Lordships’ House. He mentioned that the amendments had been returned from the other place. I say to the Minister that, at some surprise to all of us, it has come back without a single word changed,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 cc209-213
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone who has contributed on this group of amendments. I will say just one particular thing. This is not an argument between people who want to stop the boats and those who do not: it is an argument about how we do it. The Government need...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c220
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord German, and I very much agree with the remarks he made. The Government has got themselves into a right mess with respect to this flagship Bill—partly caused by the fact that they have simply not been listening to...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 cc257-8
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister answer the question that I put to him and to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Stewart? What happened to the Government’s plans to do this next week? It was due to go to the other place on Monday and come back here on Tuesday. What happened...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c259
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are very pleased to say that should the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, wish to test the opinion of the House with respect to Motions B1 and B2, we would be very supportive of them as well. I just say to the noble and learned Lord,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 cc232-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to wind up this group of amendments for His Majesty’s Opposition. We have become used to the quality of the debate on the Rwanda Bill, but I start by associating myself with all the remarks made about Lord Cormack and add my recognition that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1337-9
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

2: Clause 1, page 1, line 5, at end insert “while maintaining full compliance with domestic and international law.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment seeks to ensure that the eventual Act is fully compliant with the rule of law.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2024
Reference
836 c1345
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2024
Reference
836 c1345
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we very much support Amendments 9 and 12, which the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, has led on. They would allow the presumption that Rwanda is a safe country to be rebutted by credible evidence presented to decision-makers, including courts and tribunals. If he were to test the opinion...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2024
Reference
836 c1376
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we come to the end of today’s consideration of the Bill before us, I start with the important point that the noble Lord, Lord Kerr, mentioned. I raised it in debate on the first group of amendments, when I said that the constitutional position is that the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1414-6
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 2 agreed to on division (274 to 172). Amendment 4 agreed to on division (282 to 180). Amendment 7 agreed to on division (277 to 167). Amendment 9 agreed to on division (258 to 171). Amendment 12 agreed to on division (260 to 169)....

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Stewart of Dirleton
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office; Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Debates on bills
Date
4 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1326-1424
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage second day. Clause 2 agreed to. New clause under consideration.

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Stewart of Dirleton
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office; Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
14 February 2024
Reference
836 cc264-358
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also pay tribute to the quality of the contributions that we have had from so many noble Lords in the debate on this group. I recognise some of the shortcomings of my Amendment 29, as the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, pointed out, but it is an attempt...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2024
Reference
836 cc307-310
House
House of Lords