Skip to main content

1-20 of 180 results for subject:Procurement

Legislation X
Armed Forces Bill 2010-12

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Armed Forces Bill 2010-12 (180)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Well, Dr McCrea—[Hon. Members: ““Give way!””] Go on then, why not?

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c710
House
House of Commons

May I help the hon. Lady?

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c695
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the coalition Government on bringing forward the armed forces covenant. I served throughout the Committee—

Member
Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c700
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Lady give way?

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c693
House
House of Commons

I should at least like to finish my sentence if that is all right. New clause 17 would fully enshrine the principles of the covenant in law, not half-heartedly but unambiguously.

Member
Gemma Doyle (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c693
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his support. Our amendments do not seek to introduce new constraints to prevent the Secretary of State from using his discretion in preparing the report. They do not try to prejudge in detail exactly which subjects will be relevant—unlike, I fear, several...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c704-8
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend think that this is rather rich coming from Labour Members, and certainly from the hon. Member for North Durham (Mr Jones)? Having had 13 long years with the time, the majorities and the money to introduce a Bill, they merely produced a Green Paper, whereas...

Member
Christopher Pincher (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c704
House
House of Commons

If Members have come in at the behest of the Whips because they expect a Division, they might as well go out for a bit longer, because I have a lot more to say that will delay the Division. They are very wise to do so. New clause 4, which...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c708-9
House
House of Commons

I do not regret the process at all. What has happened—I would have thought that the hon. Lady had spotted this, because she is a capable person—is that we have been discussing and listening to things and came to the view that we might enhance the Bill, which is what...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c704
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman regret the process by which the Bill has come about? What exactly changed his mind?

Member
Gemma Doyle (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c704
House
House of Commons

Contrary to what the hon. Lady says from a sedentary position—perhaps she is reading what is on her BlackBerry—it is not chaos. Those other organisations are as concerned as the Government are to avoid the pitfalls of the covenant ending up in the courts. They have also pointed out where...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c704
House
House of Commons

Chaos.

Member
Baroness Brown of Silvertown (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c704
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman, together with the hon. Member for West Dunbartonshire, is continuing to fish for any minor criticisms that he can make. We have listened to what people have said and responded, and they might welcome that rather than carping at it.

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c704
House
House of Commons

So why did the Minister, along with his Liberal Democrat colleagues, argue forcefully in Committee on numerous occasions that the Bill as it then stood enshrined the covenant in law, when clearly it did not?

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c704
House
House of Commons

Well, one is that the amendment, no doubt with the best of intentions, describes in more detail the subjects to be covered in the covenant report. As drafted, clause 2 requires the Secretary of State to address accommodation, health care, including mental health care, and education. We have included those...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c711
House
House of Commons

I'm looking forward to it.

Member
Baroness Brown of Silvertown (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c711
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman talks about the ““forward thing””, but we have to do the sums, and I am afraid his maths is obviously not very good. If he does not believe that the Ministry of Defence is short of money, he is wrong. The Opposition's amendment 16 represents a further...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c710-1
House
House of Commons

I am sorry, but if the Minister reads the NAO report, he will see that it states that the figure is between £6 billion and £37 billion. The only way we can get to the £37 billion figure is if we include all the forward programming for the forward thing....

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c710
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c710
House
House of Commons

I do not think the hon. Gentleman needs to offer to do that. That is a bit sexist, if you ask me, but there we go. The hon. Member for West Dunbartonshire asked earlier from a sedentary position where we got the idea from that there was a £38 billion...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2011
Reference
529 c710
House
House of Commons