Skip to main content

1-20 of 453 results for subject:"Fees and charges"

Legislation X
Education Bill 2010-12

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Education Bill 2010-12 (453)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
15 November 2011
Reference
CHAP 21 2011

I. Letter dated 17/10/2011 from Baroness Verma to Laura McDonald regarding letters to be deposited in the House of Commons Library. 1 p. II. Letter dated 01/10/2011 from Baroness Verma to Lord Stevenson regarding Education Bill: proposals for part time study, and alternative finance. 4 p.

Deposited by
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Deposited papers
Date
17 October 2011
Reference
DEP2011-1660
House
House of Lords

Education Bill. Lords committee stage eleventh day. clauses 72 to 79 agreed to. Bill reported with amendments (HL Bill 98). Grand Committee held in Committee Room 4A.

Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c290-323GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these are two slightly different amendments, raising different points, which are slightly oddly grouped together. However, they raise good points and I look forward to hearing what the Minister will say about them. On the first point, following the noble Lord, Lord Sutherland, and stepping sideways around the...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c320GC
House
House of Lords

146: After Clause 73, insert the following new Clause— ““Disclaimer of eligibility for student support (1) Any student over the age of 18 (or if under that age, with the consent of the student’s parents or guardian) may disclaim the right to such financial support or arrangements as may from...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c316GC
House
House of Lords

My name is also on Amendment 146 and I very much support what my noble friend has said. I shall add one or two other arguments to the powerful arguments that he has already made. My noble friend said that losing some of our good students to go abroad for...

Member
Baroness Perry of Southwark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c317-8GC
House
House of Lords

I beg to move Amendment 146 and speak to Amendment 147A. My objective is to nudge the Government gently in the direction of common sense and fairness in these two amendments. One of the effects of the Government’s policies over the last year or two, particularly with regard to the...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c316-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for that answer. To be disappointed by my noble friend, and encouraged by the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, is indeed unusual. I hope that we will have at least the second part of that again. I shall now take an interest in the...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c322-3GC
House
House of Lords

I think the bottom line is, of course, that it is all down to affordability. We need to be clear on that. Universities have a finite budget too. I will not fall into the eloquent spider’s web of the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes. I shall just say to him that...

Member
Baroness Verma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c322GC
House
House of Lords

I would also very much like to support Amendment 148. As has already been said, not only does it address the important move of part-timers into access to loans, which is crucial, but for me it also sets out in parts 1 and 2 the right way in which it...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c312GC
House
House of Lords

I wish to support Amendment 148. I am afraid that I cannot support Amendment 145G, for reasons that I think are fairly obvious. If you have students in this position and you want a degree of equity they should be contributing pro rata to their colleagues in full-time education. However,...

Member
Lord Sutherland of Houndwood (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c311-2GC
House
House of Lords

I speak to Amendment 148, which is very different in approach to Amendment 145G, but I believe there are some similarities, as it is essential that we truly believe that part-time students have access to loans to cover fees, and should be on a par with full-time students, pro rated...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c309-11GC
House
House of Lords

We beg to differ on that. Actually, I agree on the essence—that a lot of what has been raised today needs to be discussed in a wider context. It is a great pity that we are not able to do that because of the strange way in which the Government...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c304-9GC
House
House of Lords

No, what I said was that there are issues coming up in the Higher Education White Paper that is under consultation. That is a good forum for concerns such as those raised by the noble Lord, Lord Peston. That is the place where that would be discussed far more fruitfully...

Member
Baroness Verma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c304GC
House
House of Lords

It would help us to understand it better if the Minister could reply to the question put by my noble friend Lord Stevenson of Balmacara about the threshold. Is his calculation right, that the payment would begin at about £15,000, which I think my noble friend said? If that is...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c301GC
House
House of Lords

On that technical point, and I am sorry to interrupt, no—£21,500 currently cannot possibly deflate over five years to £21,000. I simply cannot accept that.

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c302GC
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord will allow me to continue, I am hoping that I will be able to respond to the questions that he has raised. The system of student support would be much less progressive as a result of the noble Lord’s amendment. The Government remain committed to delivering...

Member
Baroness Verma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c302GC
House
House of Lords

No, the Deputy Prime Minister has not got it wrong; maybe the noble Lord has got it wrong. It is 40 per cent. This is why the threshold for repayment is being increased to £21,000 and why repayments will be taken at 9 per cent above that level. This, hopefully,...

Member
Baroness Verma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c303GC
House
House of Lords

How can the Deputy Prime Minister get it so wrong? Has he got a different brief from the Minister?

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c303GC
House
House of Lords

But the repayments are written off after 30 years. My noble friend Lady Sharp asked about the sale of student loans. The student loans Act makes clear that the borrower will not be affected by the sale. Their loans will be subject to the same terms as those that remain...

Member
Baroness Verma (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 October 2011
Reference
730 c302GC
House
House of Lords