Skip to main content

1-20 of 170 results for subject:Councillors

Legislation X
Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12 (170)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

This is a report on the House of Commons Committee Stage of the Bill. It complements Research Paper 10/63 which was prepared for Commons Second Reading. The Bill gives effect to the Coalition Government’s commitment to stop the restructuring of councils in Norfolk, Suffolk and Devon. Specifically, it would prevent...

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
18 November 2010
Reference
RP10-74

The Bill gives effect to the Coalition Government’s commitment to stop the restructuring of councils in Norfolk, Suffolk and Devon. Specifically the Bill would prevent implementation of any of the existing proposals for a single-tier local government structure made under the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007....

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
14 October 2010
Reference
RP10-63

My Lords—

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1313
House
House of Lords

But the argument advanced by the noble Baroness and the noble Lord was much more applicable to counties. I was a member of Devon County Council in the long-distant past, when I was very young—I was 22. I then had the experience of seeing the County Borough of Torbay taken...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1311-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in responding to the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Low, I simply point out that the arguments about the costs of by-elections now to be held in September illustrate one of the many reasons why it would have been far better to have approved the fatal amendment...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1323
House
House of Lords

4: Clause 2, page 1, line 14, leave out subsection (2) and insert— ““(2) Subject to subsection (2A) this Act comes into force on such day as the Secretary of State may by order appoint. (2A) No order may be made under subsection (2) until the Secretary of State has...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1324-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this debate. I am sorry that the Minister has felt unable to move on this, particularly in the light of the comments made by the noble Lord, Lord Low of Dalston. As I mentioned earlier, the Minister said in...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1324
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can say simply that I will not accept this amendment. I have heard once again all the arguments in favour, and I have listened to the noble Lord, Lord Low, very carefully. Statute is for interpretation. The fact is that these two authorities have landed themselves in...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1323-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had two contributions from the noble Baroness, Lady Shephard, and the Minister, who both make the same point—that government cannot legislate for local authorities to get on with each other. I completely agree, but that is not what this amendment does. They have answered a wider...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Shephard, for her contribution, because she has summed up very clearly what the attitude ought to be about this. It is not government business to try to ensure that counties and districts get on together; nor is it government business to ensure...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1329-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a lifelong citizen of the county of Norfolk, as a former Norfolk county councillor who on one occasion represented a city division, and as a former Norfolk Member of Parliament. I shall be very brief. The thrust of the amendment was extensively debated...

Member
Baroness Shephard of Northwold (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1328-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister has kindly written to those of us who participated in Committee and challenged her assessment of the costs and savings of Norwich and Exeter going unitary, and we are grateful. This amendment seeks to build on her information and take it forward to build the partnership...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1325-8
House
House of Lords

3: Clause 1, insert the following new Clause— ““Expenditure There shall be paid out of money provided by Parliament any expenditure incurred by the Cities of Norwich and Exeter in connection with by-elections arising from the quashing by the Court of the Norwich and Norfolk (Structural Changes) Order 2010 and...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1317
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had one hour’s consideration of a matter which is nothing to do with this Bill. We have spent one hour listening to the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, and others giving us a treatise on local government organisation. That is not what this Bill is about. We...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1314-5
House
House of Lords

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 3, at beginning insert ““Subject to the proviso in subsection (1A)””

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1298
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to speak in support of Amendments 1 and 2. These amendments invite the Government to reintroduce principle into their consideration of local government restructuring. The Secretary of State would be obliged by 2013 to consider whether further unitary reorganisations might in principle be permitted, and to...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1300-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 2. These two amendments provide that a relevant order may be made after the commencement of the Act and that the Secretary of State must, within three years, publish criteria that will apply for a replacement order to be made. Noble Lords...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1298-300
House
House of Lords

May I ask the noble and learned Baroness what what she is saying has to do with the amendments we are debating?

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1305
House
House of Lords

I scarcely know where to begin. I listened with absolute fascination to the delightfully inaccurate, inappropriate and, in places, offensive comments made by the noble Lord, Lord Howarth of Newport. I am not a politician. I am a pleb of Devon. I am proud to be so and I am...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1305
House
House of Lords

I hope your Lordships will appreciate that I would not have dreamt of standing up on this amendment if we had not had this tour de force of recrimination about the failure to get these two orders through because the judge found against them. I thought that we were talking...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1305-6
House
House of Lords