Skip to main content

1-20 of 191 results for house:"House of Lords"

Legislation X
Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09
Subject X
House of Lords

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09 (191)

Subject

More
House of Lords (191)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, this is a technical amendment. Under the European Parliament (Pay and Pensions) Act 1979, there is a power for the Leader of the House of Commons to make an order aligning MEPs’ resettlement grants with MPs’ resettlement grants. At the moment, the power can be exercised only to...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1433
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand why the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, wishes to have clarification of this clause. As he said, we have returned to a point made in an earlier debate by my noble friend Lord Campbell-Savours. The initiative for any transfer of functions must come from the Speaker. It...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1442-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, support the amendment. The noble Lord, Lord Pannick, talked about various groups of people who want to see the word "fair" included in the Bill. Members of Parliament in the other House should have that in the Bill. It is important. There are a whole lot...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1441
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, for allowing us to debate this matter again. I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Lester, that MPs are entitled to be dealt with fairly. As the noble and learned Lord, Lord Woolf, suggested, IPSA and the commission, as...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1441
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is perfectly natural to have fairness expressed in this. We are not interfering with the House of Commons at all. Its procedures have to be dealt with in connection with its executive action. But as for the commissioner’s inquiries and so forth, IPSA is making the rules...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1441
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by staying that I am seeking consensus, not defenestration. The argument of the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde, is absolutely correct. If we had been discussing the Bill as it left the other place, perhaps noble Lords would have more of an argument in favour of the...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1447-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, because we are going back to an issue that we debated at the previous stage, I repeat my concern to see new primary legislation, because of the greater opportunities that that would give for amendment and reflection. Primary legislation need not take long—this Bill is in itself an...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1446-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Clause 13 deals with a most important aspect of the expiry of the provisions of the Act, as it will be, and, in particular, a sunset clause. If we had been discussing the Bill as it was, I would gladly have continued to support the Liberal Democrats. However,...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1446
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I certainly agree with the view that some form of review is required after two years, given the speed with which this important Bill has gone through. However, the procedure that the noble Baroness the Leader of the House proposed in her amendment in Committee, which is now...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1445
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am immensely grateful to the noble Baroness for her support. We look forward to seeing her amendment in a couple of hours’ time. The noble Lord, Lord Barnett, laughs because he suspects that the relevant debate will take more than two hours, but we look forward to...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1437
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am in the happy position of having already secured the support of the Liberal Democrat Benches and of my own Front Bench for this amendment. I hope that it will also have the Government’s support. If a Member is found not to be at fault, and presumably...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1437-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to my noble friend. We shall talk to Amendment 12 when we get to it.

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1436
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that we can take this amendment with Amendments 10 and 11. Noble Lords will remember that the Government tabled a fairly substantial amendment to the Bill in Committee, inserting subsections (4), (5), (6) and (7) in Clause 7. Subsection (5)(b) refers to, ""such other conditions as...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1435
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, mentioned, I said in Committee that it is highly desirable that the Bill should contain provisions about what is to happen if no fault is found—which it does not at the moment. I notice that that is covered in Amendment 12 rather...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1436
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I added my name to this amendment and I would like to add one or two comments. As the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, indicated, judicial review would be extremely rare in this context. Therefore, inserting the word "fair" as a requirement of procedures would not make it more...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1440
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 13 would impose on the IPSA a duty to ensure that the procedures which it lays down for the conduct of investigations by the commissioner must be fair. Subsections (11) and (12) already require that the procedures must satisfy specific requirements of fairness, but all other matters...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1439-40
House
House of Lords

Amendment 13 13: Clause 7, page 5, line 36, after "must" insert "be fair and"

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1439
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I stand by what I said in response to the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin. The Government believe that this is a matter for the IPSA to decide. The IPSA may decide that it wishes to have a consistent approach, or it may not wish to do that. However,...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1439
House
House of Lords

That is a somewhat disappointing reply. By definition we are dealing with the case of a Member against whom no fault has been found. It seems to me that the initial stages of an investigation by the commissioner are bound to be conducted away from the public eye. The press...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1438-9
House
House of Lords

As the noble Lord explained, his amendment would leave it up to the MP to decide whether a "no fault" finding should be publicised. We had some debate in Committee on 14 July about what should happen to publication of the commissioner’s reports, particularly where there had been a "no...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1438
House
House of Lords