Skip to main content

1-20 of 235 results for subject:Functions

Legislation X
Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09 (235)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I take the hon. Gentleman's point. On balance, I prefer my first theory to my second. Nevertheless, I cannot exclude the second. Having spoken to others who might know more about this than I do, and who seem to be more knowledgeable about the House's procedures and rules, I believe...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c248
House
House of Commons

Picking up on the point that was made a moment ago by the hon. Member for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine (Sir Robert Smith), the hon. and learned Gentleman is making much of the question of potential justiciability, but there is no basis or warrant for that claim on the basis...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c248
House
House of Commons

No, it is not. The rules will come into force and, despite what the hon. and learned Member for Beaconsfield has said—that at the moment a breach of the code would not give rise to a criminal offence—it is certainly the case that, because a failure to comply with the...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c246-7
House
House of Commons

I have been listening all night long to this very interesting debate, which mixed up Sir Christopher Kelly, the new rules coming in tomorrow and this Bill. I should add at the outset that the purpose of amendment 16, which stands in my name and that of the right hon....

Member
Stuart Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c253
House
House of Commons

With respect to the hon. Gentleman, he is tilting at windmills.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c192
House
House of Commons

Schedule 2 creates a new Commissioner for Parliamentary Investigations, but it leaves in place the existing Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. After the legislation comes into force, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards will, for an as yet unspecified period, retain responsibility for the register of Members' staff, the register of journalists...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c204
House
House of Commons

I am very happy to acknowledge that. I regard myself—whether others do is a matter for them—as someone who takes his constituency responsibilities very seriously. However, it happens that I have been on the Front Bench in one capacity or another since November 1980, which is some time ago. When...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c256
House
House of Commons

The Minister made a helpful reply. I accept the implied rebuke that my drafting is not perfect and that there is somebody somewhere else who thinks they can do a better job. It would be churlish to press the amendment against the undertaking given by the Minister, so I beg...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c240
House
House of Commons

I am in a great dilemma. Today the current rules come to an end. As from tomorrow, we are supposed to declare all these timings and things, which were so brilliantly exposed as odd by the right hon. Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field) in his speech yesterday; I supported him...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c244
House
House of Commons

Before my hon. and learned Friend sits down, will he give us some advice about amendment 74? It states:""The IPSA must prepare a code to be observed by members of the House of Commons, the content of which is provision made by virtue of subsections (7), (8) and (10)."" Does...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c252
House
House of Commons

Could the Government think a little more carefully about another problem? They are in danger of leading themselves into yet further difficulties. The Secretary of State has now accepted that it would be unwise for a serving member of the judiciary to fulfil the function, but the Government's policy seems...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c202
House
House of Commons

The hon. and learned Gentleman's imagination is running away with him. I promise him that that is not the case.

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c207
House
House of Commons

I think that the hon. and learned Gentleman may be persuaded that it is very clear that the latter would be the role of IPSA. The hon. and learned Gentleman referred to proposed new subsection (3). I turn now to proposed new subsection (2). It provides for the fact that...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c231
House
House of Commons

I appreciate that point, and I hope that it would have to follow automatically that IPSA did that. However, in proposed new subsection (3), the hon. Gentleman wants IPSA to""provide general guidance to Members on relevant principles and considerations of due parliamentary standards to be reflected in the preparation and...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c231
House
House of Commons

This relatively small amendment is significant, because it would add the Committee on Standards in Public Life to the list of people and bodies that IPSA would have a statutory duty to consult when preparing or revising the MPs' allowances scheme. I find it astonishing that the Government could have...

Member
Lord Tyrie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c228-9
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 68, page 2, line 11, at end insert—

Member
Lord Tyrie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c228
House
House of Commons

I wish to press the amendment to a Division. Question put, That the amendment be made:— The Committee divided: Ayes 189, Noes 295.

Member
Lord Tyrie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c224
House
House of Commons

Nothing in new clause 10 imposes any duty on HMRC. It is not obliged to conform to anything. Amendment 71 would require consultation between the authority and HMRC so that it can draw up its schemes in the light of what HMRC has said will be the likely treatment of...

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c230-1
House
House of Commons

I interrupt the hon. Gentleman because although I appreciate what he is trying to do—indeed, it might be the right thing to do—the difficulty is that, as I understand it, the Revenue might take a completely different view of matters from the morality view. It is indeed right that that...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c230
House
House of Commons

Obviously, I rise to speak to amendment 71 and new clause 10, which are tabled in my name. I begin by noting and accepting the strong case that has been made for amendment 68. The House would reject it at the risk of creating a very serious misunderstanding and misapprehension....

Member
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2009
Reference
495 c229-30
House
House of Commons