Skip to main content

1-20 of 187 results for subject:"Devolved matters"

Legislation X
Political Parties and Elections Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Political Parties and Elections Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09 (187)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Secretary of State's clarification again shows how important it is to take time to get such legislation right. I have calculated on my BlackBerry that someone who wanted to give money to a particular party in every constituency in the country could give £4,844,354 a year and apparently not...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c95
House
House of Commons

No, because I think I would be brought back into order if I did so. The hon. Member for Ribble Valley (Mr. Evans)—he is not here, but it is important that I correct the record—asked whether aggregate donations would breach the limit. Although I did not say so in terms,...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c94-5
House
House of Commons

You need a Fisherman's Friend.

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c95
House
House of Commons

I think I need more than that. I am going to stop now; I think that would be wise, in the interests of my cough, if nothing else. I commend the amendments that stand in my name. Lords amendment 11 disagreed to. Lords amendment 12 disagreed to. Government amendments (a)...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c95
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend may well be right. I want to concentrate on the question of whether the proposed measure would have an impact within the context of the Human Rights Act and article 10, which is about freedom of expression. Unlike the hon. Member for Cambridge, I think that...

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c92-3
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State, almost certainly for reasons of forensic and rhetorical flourish, is misrepresenting and mischaracterising the policy of the party to which I belong. As he knows very well, our policy is to replace the schedule to the Human Rights Act with a new Bill of Rights based...

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c94
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I should like to respond to the debate. It has been characterised by two distinct kinds of speeches. The hon. Members for Huntingdon (Mr. Djanogly) and for Cambridge (David Howarth) and many—but not all—contributors from my side have sought to address...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c93-4
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State give way?

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c94
House
House of Commons

I look forward to seeing further particulars of that proposal, especially as the other bit of the Conservatives' policy is that they apparently remain committed to the convention. How the devil one is able to draft a new schedule that is consistent with the convention without its ending up being...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c94
House
House of Commons

It would be a rash politician who ever said "never", but when the hon. Lady has heard the rest of my remarks, I think she will agree that rushing the matter in the way she suggests would be unwise and risk tarnishing our whole electoral system. I will go through...

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c100
House
House of Commons

I understand the Minister's point about 2014 and the amount of work that has to be done, but if matters happen to move more quickly than he anticipates, will the Government take steps to bring forward the date for full introduction to, for example, 2013 or 2012, if that is...

Member
Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c100
House
House of Commons

I am very grateful to the hon. Lady, and I look forward to her support for the amendments as a result. It is important that we take a phased approach, alongside extensive work to increase registration rates. That will enable us to uphold the integrity of our electoral registration processes...

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c98-9
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 33.

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c95
House
House of Commons

Of course I accept that, and I said that the corporation sole must be demonstrably independent of the Government. I do not think that the Secretary of State would quite qualify under that particular criterion. Data security and protection are very important and, for that reason, the new power provides...

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c96-8
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the need for flexibility, but will the Minister say a bit more about what sort of body he has in mind? Simply requiring the power to be given to a corporation sole might mean that it ends up being given to the Secretary of State, or to a...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c96
House
House of Commons

These amendments were introduced on Report in the Lords and accepted without debate. They are seen as necessary for the implementation of the CORE scheme, the co-ordinated online record of electors. In particular, they are essential to ensure that there is authority to create a new non-departmental public body to...

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c95-6
House
House of Commons

The Government tabled several amendments to the Bill's provisions on the Electoral Commission's powers and governance at various stages in the other place. These amendments all respond to concerns raised in this House, in the other place, or by the Electoral Commission. I will briefly outline the effect of each...

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c116-7
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the hon. Lady will recast her formulation that we have changed our mind. She knows that we have approached everything in the Bill with an open mind and that we are flexible and ever eager for consensus on it.

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c119
House
House of Commons

I agree that the Minister has attempted to achieve consensus. I thought that we had achieved it on the matter until, suddenly, he wanted to achieve a different consensus at the 11th hour in the House of Lords. However, in the spirit of consensus and out of respect for the...

Member
Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c119-20
House
House of Commons

Yes, precisely because they are smaller. Lords amendments 3 and 4 are consequential amendments. Lords amendments 5 and 6 enable the commission's chief executive to increase the one-year restriction on previous political activity for commission staff in clause 7 to a period of between two and five years by designating...

Member
Lord Wills (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
496 c117-9
House
House of Commons