Skip to main content

1-20 of 103 results for subject:Devolution

Legislation X
Energy Bill 2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Energy Bill 2007-08 (103)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I hardly dare venture into this debate. I will try to be as brave as I can. I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Carnegy, for raising this issue and for doing so with her usual courtesy. She was kind enough to write me a note about this. My...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c571-2GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 42: 42: Clause 43, page 40, line 9, at end insert— ““( ) the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, and ( ) any relevant local authority.”” The noble Baroness said: I shall speak also to Amendments Nos. 43, 44 and 45. All the amendments in this group relate to...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c573GC
House
House of Lords

On that point, did the noble Lord mean ““tree huggers”” as a description of all those people who are anti-nuclear in a pejorative way?

Member
Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c571GC
House
House of Lords

As we come to Chapter 1 in Part 3, I hope that it is in order if I ask the Minister a question which I asked at Second Reading, but to which I have not heard an answer from the Government. I would like to pursue it. Clause 101, the...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c569-70GC
House
House of Lords

No, I am grateful to the noble Lord. Whether Dr Stone will be employed continually may be a matter for later decision, but it is intended that following the interim report that has just been published, there should be a final report from him in the autumn. It will cover...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c566-8GC
House
House of Lords

There is no guilty party, so let us all proceed in our innocence, although we are dealing with an extremely sophisticated issue. I was going to commend the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, for the assiduous way in which he has addressed himself to the issue of the continuation and recruitment...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c564-6GC
House
House of Lords

I, too, support the amendment, as all parties seem to do. The noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, made an important point about the regulator. Safety is of paramount importance, bearing in mind particularly how ill informed is the press on virtually all matters, particularly the future supply of energy. We need...

Member
Lord Palmer (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c564GC
House
House of Lords

I am aware of that. There is nothing new under the sun and certainly not from this Dispatch Box. I know that the noble Lord wants us to move on and I will listen carefully to his argument, but I am not sure about the noble Lord’s case to change...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c609-10GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 41: 41: Before Clause 42, insert the following new Clause— ““Nuclear Installations Inspectorate The Secretary of State shall, in each calendar year following that in which this Act is passed, lay before Parliament a report on— (a) his assessment of the appropriate levels of staff and resources...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c561-2GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for the amendment because it gives the Government the opportunity to clarify certain matters. It has to be said that in the intervening period since his first discussions with Ministers and officials, there have been attempts at clarification. Those of us who were fortunate enough...

Member
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c580-2GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister’s flow is interrupted, can I ask for another clarification? We are talking about very long periods. Are these fixed sums in the money of the day and do they stay fixed in the money of the day?

Member
Lord Oxburgh (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c586GC
House
House of Lords

No, I was merely agreeing with the noble Lord that I hope my noble friend will be restored to health. I was not saying that that had happily happened yet.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c579GC
House
House of Lords

As I understand it, they do not have a statutory basis. These are the engagement activities that the NDA and British Energy currently undertake with local communities. Before I sit down, I shall have a response for the noble Lord about what may happen in the future. Amendments Nos. 42...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c575-7GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Bach, for his response, and I thank the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale, for his support. I understand that the noble Lord, Lord Bach, will not give me what I would like; however, one learns along the way every time that nothing is ever really...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c577-8GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 43A: 43A: Clause 45, page 40, line 42, at end insert— ““and any such modification may either increase or reduce the amount of money specified in the funded decommissioning programme.”” The noble Lord said: Those who took part in the Second Reading will remember that I spoke...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c578GC
House
House of Lords

Could the noble Lord say that again?

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c577GC
House
House of Lords

I shall try—the nuclear liabilities funding arrangements board, known as NLFAB. Information will also come from trustees of the independent fund and other related specialists. The board is being set up to provide the Secretary of State with the right level of technical and financial scrutiny. It will be thorough...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c577GC
House
House of Lords

I thank those who joined in on this short discussion. It is extremely reassuring to know that the present Government in Westminster have drafted the Bill in that way not because that is how they want it but because they feel that they cannot do otherwise. I was a little...

Member
Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c572-3GC
House
House of Lords

We support the amendment on the basis that local communities will be involved through the local authority. One of the problems with the privatisation of many of the companies with which we are concerned is that there do not seem to be many access points to long-term decisions, and we...

Member
Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c573GC
House
House of Lords

That was exactly what I meant.

Member
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2008
Reference
702 c571GC
House
House of Lords