Skip to main content

1-20 of 196 results for subject:Testing

Legislation X
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08 (196)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I entirely understand where my hon. Friend is coming from, and new clause 9 is very welcome. He says that the power will be time-limited. What will happen if the time runs out, but a new operator has not been found?

Member
David Clelland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c583
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention. The power is time-limited; the proposal is that the time should be limited to nine months, with the option of having a further three months thereafter. It is, in our opinion, highly unlikely that a transport operator would not be found, because...

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c583
House
House of Commons

We are making that provision in the Bill, and as I said, we will be consulting on our guidance and so on with trade unions and bus operators alike to take the provisions forward. They are clearly laid out on the face of the Bill to give a true minimum...

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c582-3
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for that intervention. She knows the answer, as I made my position clear throughout the whole Committee stage, just as my hon. Friend the Member for Scarborough and Whitby made his clear on Second Reading. We do not believe that quality contracts will be successful....

Member
Stephen Hammond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c586
House
House of Commons

I welcome many of the statements that the Minister has made tonight with regard to TUPE. A joint mechanism between the Government and the trade unions would be invaluable to monitor the implementation of the legislation in the coming period, particularly the detail that will be in the regulations, which...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c618
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend clarify, on that specific point, that that will also apply to employees of operators who are not local government operators?

Member
Ian Stewart (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c618
House
House of Commons

This covers all employees who have been working under quality contract schemes. Let me turn finally to issues of unfair dismissal, particularly whether it is automatically unfair if an employee is dismissed by an operator who fails to win a quality contract. We do not believe that that constitutes unfair...

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c618
House
House of Commons

It might be that I do not understand new clause 9. Will the Minister talk me through the scenario that was adverted to by my hon. Friend the Member for Manchester, Blackley (Graham Stringer), in which an authority issues an invitation to tender within the appropriate time frame but no...

Member
Rob Marris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c615
House
House of Commons

This provision is for a time-limited period of nine months, plus three months as a further option, to get the contracts in place. Under the scheme, there is a period of time for the contract that was running, so it would be for the remainder of that period that this...

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c615-6
House
House of Commons

I think that my hon. Friend has got the drift of this. The rationale that he has put forward has been clearly understood on both sides of the House. However, I am worried about the unknown and unexpected things that could happen at the end of the 12-month period. I...

Member
Ian Stewart (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c614
House
House of Commons

I understand what my hon. Friend is trying to achieve. However, if I am to revisit the matter before the end of Report, I shall have to move extremely quickly to do it before 9 o'clock. I ask hon. Members to accept that we have recognised the issue of the...

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c614-5
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way again on that point?

Member
Rob Marris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c617
House
House of Commons

No; let me make some progress. In common, however, with my right hon. Friend the Member for Doncaster, Central, I want to respond to the amendments and to comments made by right hon. and hon. Members in the debate. Indeed, it would be discourteous not to do so. My hon....

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c617
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister view amendment No. 8 as almost a wrecking one, as under (c)(iii), all the consultees have to be"““living within 150 metres of any part of the route as specified in the proposed scheme””?" If one person were missed out, we would end up with judicial review, which...

Member
Rob Marris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c616
House
House of Commons

I think that my hon. Friend may well have put his finger directly on the intention behind some of these amendments—[Interruption.] I am sure that the hon. Member for Wimbledon has been closely following our deliberations and he will have read the amendments tabled by others.

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c616
House
House of Commons

There would, of course, be an incentive for the local transport authority, as it would have been charged with providing those services for the bus passengers to whom it was responsible. I have genuinely tried to find out whether there is any belief that this process would be likely to...

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c614
House
House of Commons

May I suggest a way forward? We all understand that the Minister does not want to give local authorities carte blanche indefinitely. A solution might be to give the traffic commissioner further authority to extend the process beyond the three months. The commissioner, an independent person, might be able to...

Member
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c614
House
House of Commons

I agree with the Minister's analysis, but does he think it would be helpful for local authorities to avoid any pitfalls by discussing the scheme informally with the QCS board before its submission, or does he think that the two processes should be separated so that there is no prior...

Member
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c611
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his intervention. I have said clearly that those who propose the scheme should use every option to ensure that they consult. As I said in response to an earlier intervention about the time process, local transport authorities will take time to develop a scheme....

Member
Paul Clark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c612
House
House of Commons

The Minister just used the phrase ““a full-case review””, but will he be absolutely clear about that? My understanding was that the Transport Tribunal's role in investigating any appeal where there was a division between the QCS board and a local authority would be limited to matters of disagreement between...

Member
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2008
Reference
481 c612
House
House of Commons