Skip to main content

1-20 of 453 results for subject:Roads

Legislation X
Planning Bill 2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Planning Bill 2007-08 (453)
More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
26 November 2008
Reference
CHAP 29 2008

My Lords, I am delighted to be a cosignatory to the amendment and to be able to indicate, very briefly, some support from this side of the House. I am not sure whether the Minister seeks to emulate the feats of Palmerston or sees herself as a latter-day Palmerston this...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c674-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want briefly to support and supplement the comments of my noble friend Lady Hamwee in moving the amendment. She rightly laid emphasis on the complexity of the system in terms of London and the metropolitan cities, but I want to consider rural areas. Specifically I refer to...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c733-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted that my name is also on this amendment. I shall collect the speeches of the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, to produce a short book containing the wisdom and good sense that he has delivered to us during this stage of the Bill. I shall add...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c675
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 144A to 144D: 144A: Clause 210, page 121, line 20, at end insert— ““(2A) The regulations may make provision about the consequences of failure to assume liability, to give a notice or to comply with another procedure under CIL regulations in connection with CIL.”” 144B: Clause 210,...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c777-8
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 153A: 153A: Clause 217, page 125, line 26, at end insert— ““(2) The Treasury may by order repeal the Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Act 2007 (c. 2).”” On Question, amendment agreed to. [Amendments Nos. 154 and 154A not moved.] Clause 224 [Orders and regulations]:

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c779
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I may be able to help on this. I believe the position is that the noble Baroness may bring forward some amendments, but if she does not bring any forward it would be in the spirit of what has just happened that there could be Third Reading amendments....

Member
Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c774
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we shall cover airfields as well in that response. Amendment No. 141A, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Best, and the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, seeks to insert words into Clause 208(2) to ensure that the list of items of infrastructure is not exhaustive. I assure the noble...

Member
Lord Patel of Bradford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c743-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as always, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Best, for enabling us to have this discussion on the implications for affordable housing. I much appreciate the intention of his Amendments Nos. 134 and 151 to seek to protect the provision of affordable housing secured through developer...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c749-51
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Bill be now further considered on Report. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c660
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is an exceedingly disappointing reply. The noble Baroness has made no attempt to answer the point that was made in an intervention by the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart. How can the other place decide whether to waive its privilege if we do not put this amendment into...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c716
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the first part of what the noble Lord said: the House of Commons has the ability to waive its privilege. I shall proceed with my argument and address some of the issues that he raised. The DPRRC noted examples of where the other place has...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c715-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the noble Baroness accept that it appears from Erskine May that, while this matter may be within the boundaries of House of Commons privilege, it is also one that the House of Commons has the power to waive? Therefore it would be appropriate to ask the House...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c715
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again, when we debated this in Committee we were unfortunate that it came at a compressed time of the day. I am pleased that we have had the opportunity for a wider debate, and particularly that the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart has been able to join it....

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c714-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I endorse entirely the remarks of the noble Lords, Lord Jenkin and Lord Goodhart; I will not attempt to improve upon them. I appreciate that the Minister is not in an easy position on this. I say to her only that this is not a matter of government...

Member
Lord Woolmer of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c714
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I thank my noble friend for once again raising this issue and sticking with it when he had little initial encouragement. Secondly, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, who, as chairman of the Delegated Powers Committee, has perforce had to study in great detail the constitutional...

Member
Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c714
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I added my name to these amendments to signify the support of these Benches. I knew that that was the right thing to do, and was further convinced having listened to the speech of the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin of Roding. I am also convinced that I was...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c713
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, but with a distinct lack of the legal expertise displayed by the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart. We are talking about regulations being put together to govern the application of a locally set, raised and applied levy. That levy is not a...

Member
Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c713
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments Nos. 130 and 149, which have just been spoken to by the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, raise an unusual issue and one which is of some constitutional importance. That issue is the extent to which the House of Commons could or should reserve to itself the sole...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c711-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in Committee, I put my name to the amendment of my noble friend Lord Jenkin. The fact that I have not done so on this occasion does not mean that I have withdrawn my support. It is still there, but I was a little tardy in getting my...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2008
Reference
705 c713
House
House of Lords