Skip to main content

1-20 of 28 results for subject:Vetting

Legislation X
Electricity Act 1989
Session X
2017-19

Type

House

Session

2017-19 (28)

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Electricity Act 1989 (28)
More

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Moved by

Baroness Grender

27: Schedule 1, page 25, line 8, leave out from “exceeds” to end of line 13 and insert “£50, the amount of the excess is a prohibited payment.”

Member
Baroness Grender (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c142
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendments 29 and 30 and in support of Amendment 28, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Kennedy. I thank the Minister for all the meetings with him and his officials and for the meeting today on guidance. I look forward to continuing to...

Member
Baroness Grender (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 cc143-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as this is my first contribution to the proceedings, I draw the attention of the House to my relevant interest as a vice-president of the Local Government Association.

This group of amendments covers Schedule 1 to the Bill, specifically around issues of changing or terminating the tenancy agreement. Amendment...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c144
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendment 29. I entirely understand the points made by the noble Baroness, Lady Grender. A number of individuals collectively forming “tenant” particularly occurs in London and other metropolitan areas. Those of us who inhabit the countryside tend to have single tenants in a...

Member
Earl of Lytton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 cc144-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is worth underlining that this part of the Bill is an important measure to prevent what is a pretty common abuse, which is, when there is a change of tenancy, at little or no cost to the landlord, the agents involved making serious amounts of money, which...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 cc145-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part in this short debate relating to the charges that can be imposed for variation, assignment, novation or termination of a tenancy where these are requested by the tenant. We have previously set out that it is not...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 cc146-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords who have spoken about these amendments. When the noble Earl, Lord Lytton, talks about how one defines “reasonable”, a good look through the guidance will drive him in the direction of asking that question quite a lot, because quite a lot hinges on “reasonable”...

Member
Baroness Grender (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c147
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Kennedy of Southwark

31: Schedule 1, page 26, line 3, at end insert—

“( ) In the case of a payment to a landlord, such a payment is a permitted payment only if the landlord is required by the tenancy agreement to review the contract or contracts annually and make...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c148
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 31 and 32 in my name seek to add two new sub-paragraphs to paragraph 8 of Schedule 1. The schedule is concerned with permitted payments and paragraph 8 is concerned with payments in respect of utilities. Amendment 31 seeks to place a requirement on the landlord to...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c148
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Kennedy, in these two amendments, which would help to tighten up the Bill. As he said, paragraph 8 of Schedule 1 is very open-ended, and he referred to a loophole potentially lying within it as it is worded. I think his amendment...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c148
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have great sympathy with this amendment but I would have more were it possible to ensure that utility providers themselves acted reasonably. While I will not name any names, one particular well-known supplier of electricity, with what is generally regarded as an extremely cheap and competitive tariff,...

Member
Earl of Lytton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 cc148-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Countess of Lytton is clearly even more formidable than the noble Earl.

I too have a lot of sympathy with these amendments, but I believe there are already sufficient existing protections—not in this Bill but in other legislation—which address the concerns raised by noble Lords. Landlords who resell...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 cc149-150
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in this short debate, and particularly the noble Lord, Lord Young of Cookham, for his very helpful response. I will withdraw my amendment shortly, but I would like to check something. He helpfully set out the legislation which will prevent people from...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c150
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord sits down I would like to say that that is a very helpful suggestion. We will indeed look at the guidance to see whether that suggestion can be incorporated.

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c150
House
House of Lords

In that case, I am happy to withdraw the amendment.

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c150
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Gardner of Parkes

32A: Schedule 1, page 26, line 29, at end insert—

“Payment in respect of identity and immigration status checks

11 (1) A payment for or in connection with the costs associated with carrying out identity and immigration status checks on the tenant is a permitted payment.

(2) But, in...

Member
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c150
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have moved this amendment simply because it is essential for people to know what they can be charged and what they cannot. The noble Lord, Lord Kennedy, commented at the end of his speech on just that fact: that people need to know. If something was in...

Member
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c151
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness has made a valid point. I recall some years ago having to check the identity of an applicant for a business tenancy, who produced a passport from a Commonwealth country which was in date but did not contain the crucial words in the out-of-date one,...

Member
Earl of Lytton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c151
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I take an opposing view. I am sad to do so on the noble Baroness’s amendment, since she does so much good work in this sector. I declare my interest as a co-chair of the Home Office’s right to rent consultative panel, which looks at the right to...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c152
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Best. It is important that we are able to discuss this matter through the amendment moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Gardner of Parkes, but there is an issue of principle here, which is that it should be a charge not...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2018
Reference
794 c152
House
House of Lords