Skip to main content

1-20 of 47 results for subject:Science

Legislation X
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (47)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

A Westminster Hall debate has been scheduled for 19 February on e-petitions relating to animal testing and non-animal research methods. The subject for this debate has been chosen by the Petitions Commitee, and the debate will be opened by Elliot Colburn MP.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
15 February 2024
Reference
CDP-2024-0028

There are lots of circumstances in which anaesthetics are administered. Obviously, everybody is under an obligation to minimise whatever suffering may be incurred as part of an experiment. For example, reference was made to beagles being bled for scientific purposes. As I understand it, that happens from time to time...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc280-1WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the pithy but powerful remarks from the hon. Member for Ochil and South Perthshire (John Nicolson). I thank the hon. Member for Linlithgow and East Falkirk (Martyn Day) for his introduction to the debate and the 187 people from Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport who...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc269-270WH
House
House of Commons

Motion, That this House has considered e-petition 591775, relating to laboratory animals and the Animal Welfare Act. Agreed to on question. Sitting adjourned without Question put.

Lead member
Martyn Day
Answering member
Kit Malthouse
Department
Home Office
Type
e-petition debates
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc255-282WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered e-petition 591775, relating to laboratory animals and the Animal Welfare Act.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Pritchard. This petition closed on 20 January and attracted more than 110,000 signatures, including 139 from my constituency. Leading this debate today...

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c255WH
House
House of Commons

While I acknowledge that there remains a need for animal testing in some areas of medicine, current legislation negates any need to urgently move away from unnecessary procedures or experiments. Does the hon. Member agree that the Government need to apply greater pressure for alternative methods to be used?

Member
Margaret Ferrier (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c255WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for making that point. The fact that we know that 90% of animal experiments do not bring any real benefit tells us that we need to move very quickly in the opposite direction. I would favour a full ban on animal experimentation, because we could...

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc255-6WH
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with my hon. Friend’s points. Beagle puppies are no less sentient than any other animal. Does my hon. Friend agree that it is horrendous that, in this day and age, the beagles are also used for their blood and reportedly have plasma drained from them while still...

Member
Lisa Cameron (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c256WH
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely with my hon. Friend’s comments. I will come on to that shortly. It is an absolutely abhorrent practice.

More importantly, perhaps the Minister can give reasons to assist us all in understanding why this procedure, which is classified as mild suffering under Home Office licensing, cannot be replaced...

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc256-7WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for being so generous in giving way a second time. Gene-based medicine is a rapidly developing science that allows treatment to be completely personalised based on a patient’s DNA. That could not be replicated through animal experimentation. Does the hon. Member agree that this kind...

Member
Margaret Ferrier (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c257WH
House
House of Commons

I agree entirely. That form of medicine is better not only for animals but for humans as well.

Consequently, early-day motion 175 called on the Government to urgently

“mandate a rigorous public scientific hearing, judged by independent experts from the relevant science fields, to stop the funding of the now proven failed...

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c257WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way; he is being |extremely generous. Does he agree with me and those in the all-party parliamentary dog advisory welfare group that we really must find the time and place for this scientific hearing? There are alternatives, and those who engage in the...

Member
Lisa Cameron (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c257WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very powerful point. Why should we be frightened of a fact-based approach? As well as repeated forced feeding, they are forced to inhale substances for between 28 and 90 days to measure the effects of repeat exposure on the liver, kidneys, lungs, heart and nervous...

Member
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc257-261WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Pritchard. I thank the hon. Member for Linlithgow and East Falkirk (Martyn Day) for his very powerful opening speech.

This is a very important debate on the welfare of animals subject to research. In preparing my comments for today’s debate, I...

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c260WH
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Lisa Cameron (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c260WH
House
House of Commons

I am very happy to take interventions if I am wrong about that and someone wants to correct me.

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c260WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for the way that he has approached the debate. He clearly wants to look at the evidence base, which is incredibly powerful and important. Does he agree, however, that to get to the bottom of whether the alternatives are sufficient in today’s world, a scientific...

Member
Lisa Cameron (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 c260WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her remarks. The issue is not the general principle but the specifics. As with the example of xenotransplantation that I just gave, one can produce lots of specific examples in which the cost-benefit analysis under the ASPA is probably justified. I am sure that...

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc262-3WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Pritchard, for what I think is the first time. I thank the Petitions Committee for tabling today’s petition debate. Indeed, 176 petitioners came from my constituency.

As we debate the petition, we must remember that the Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill is...

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc263-5WH
House
House of Commons

I had not intended to speak in this debate; I came to listen. In the light of some of the comments, however, I basically want to ask a question and to put down a caveat.

In the early 1980s, the splendid Bill Annett, who was the driving force behind the Fund...

Member
Roger Gale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
708 cc264-6WH
House
House of Commons