Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for subject:Testing

Legislation X
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (29)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion, That this House has considered e-petitions 633591 and 645885 relating to animal testing and non-animal research methods. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Elliot Colburn
Answering member
Andrew Griffith
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Backbench debates; e-petition debates
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc163-183WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered e-petitions 633591 and 645885 relating to animal testing and non-animal research methods.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dame Caroline. On behalf of the Petitions Committee, I would like to introduce two petitions dealing with legislation on animal testing and...

Member
Elliot Colburn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc163-4WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for allowing me to intervene; he is making a passionate speech on such an important matter. My constituency is Ynys Môn, and we are an island of animal lovers—animals ranging from dolphins and red squirrels to sheep and cattle and our feline and canine friends—so...

Member
Virginia Crosbie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c164WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for that intervention; I think that more than 100 of her constituents signed this petition too. I hope that the Minister heard her request—indeed, I am sure that it is an ask of all of us in the Chamber today. What is being...

Member
Elliot Colburn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc164-5WH
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c165WH
House
House of Commons

That is one of the things I want to stress, but before I do so, I will give way to the Chair of the Women and Equalities Committee.

Member
Elliot Colburn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c165WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes the really important point that non-animal methods can be much more accurate than using animals in these experiments. Does he agree that companies such as Lush, which came to Parliament before Christmas to advocate for those methods, have shown the way in which, through science, we...

Member
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c165WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree with my right hon. Friend. This is something that we cannot stress enough in this debate: it has been proven in the data time and again that non-animal methods are highly accurate, and much more accurate when it comes to predicting human responses than animal testing is....

Member
Elliot Colburn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c165WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a fantastic speech. He is standing up for all the animals that do not have a voice in the industry and speaking for those

across the UK who want to support them. Several organisations contacted me and talked about the need for change. They said...

Member
Lisa Cameron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c165WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right, and I hope the Minister heard that.

Commercial breeding—in particular, of beagles—is hard for this country to accept. The data shows that a lot of such testing, if not all of it, is unnecessary because the accuracy of the tests is so low. Given that...

Member
Elliot Colburn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c166WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Dame Caroline. I congratulate the hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Elliot Colburn) on leading the debate in such a detailed, passionate and knowledgeable way.

My constituents, like all others, are passionate about animals, and many have contacted me to...

Member
Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc166-8WH
House
House of Commons

This is an incredibly important debate, which has been brought about by these two petitions. In 1986, this country introduced the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act. At the time, it was seen as world-leading and as the gold standard, with its three Rs principles: to replace animal testing wherever possible; to...

Member
George Eustice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc168-9WH
House
House of Commons

I have always thought that one of the problems—as a former Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, perhaps the right hon. Gentleman will have insight into this—is that animal welfare sits with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs but the Home Office is in charge...

Member
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c169WH
House
House of Commons

That is part of the problem. I am sure that the Minister has a busy diary, and there is an argument that the issue falls partly on the Science Department and partly on the Home Office. At the moment, the unit that processes the licences sits in the Home Office...

Member
George Eustice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc169-172WH
House
House of Commons

As always, Dame Caroline, it is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Elliot Colburn) on his excellent introduction to this debate, which set out all the issues in his usual informed style.

I have spoken about animal welfare on...

Member
Tracey Crouch (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc172-3WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Elliot Colburn) for opening the debate so comprehensively, as he has done with other such debates. I am delighted to participate in this debate on animal testing and non-animal research methods, arising from e-petitions that have attracted more than 140,000 signatures...

Member
Patricia Gibson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc173-6WH
House
House of Commons

It is a real pleasure to serve under your chairship, Dame Caroline.

I acknowledge the strength of public feeling about animal testing. Together, the petitions that we are debating today received more than 140,000 signatures, including 114 in Newcastle upon Tyne Central. I thank everyone who signed the petitions for bringing...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 cc174-7WH
House
House of Commons

For the record, I do not advocate or support any testing on dogs, particularly in the manner that the hon. Lady described. My point was that some past research on animals has enabled a great many positive outcomes for cancer patients, such as myself.

Member
Tracey Crouch (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c178WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for her intervention. I was not implying support for a specific type of testing, but making a general point: some have argued in the past that animal testing has been necessary to save human lives, and groups such as Understanding Animal Research argue that currently....

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c178WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes an important point. Although these technologies are developing year on year, they have been around for some time. She said 10 years, and some would say that some of them have been around for closer to 20 years. Why does she think we have not seen...

Member
George Eustice (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
745 c178WH
House
House of Commons