Skip to main content

1-20 of 95 results for subject:Devolution

Legislation X
Civil Contingencies Act 2004

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Civil Contingencies Act 2004 (95)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, in June 2021, the Constitution Committee published its report COVID-19 and the Use and Scrutiny of Emergency Powers, following a broader inquiry into the constitutional implications of Covid-19 chaired by my esteemed noble friend Lady Taylor of Bolton. The social, economic and health implications of the pandemic were...

Member
Baroness Drake (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc21-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the use of emergency powers is defined in the report as follows:

“Emergency legislation may be necessary in exceptional circumstances, but its use should be limited given its significant constitutional consequences.”

In addition:

“All governments should recognise that, however great or sudden an emergency may be, exceptional powers are lent, not...

Member
Baroness Foster of Oxton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc25-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Select Committee for another excellent report. While it is a shame that it has taken so long for it to be considered, many of the issues raised remain very relevant and have constitutional implications that are very much alive and unresolved.

The report rightly identifies that,...

Member
Baroness Bryan of Partick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc26-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am the other Member of this Committee who was a member of the committee whose report we are considering. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Drake, for the careful way in which she introduced our report and highlighted the particular matters on which the Minister is being...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc27-30GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the Constitution Committee on this excellent report. I certainly recommend that it is read widely in the public sphere because it is important to try to assimilate what happened and to learn lessons. However, before I recommend that it is read, I might have to issue...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc28-33GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the committee for its report and my noble friend for her excellent introduction. What I recall most about the pandemic—I appreciate that, because it is such a void in our lives, it is very difficult to remember what we did—was the strength of our communities. Our...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc33-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thought that the way the noble Lord, Lord Collins, opened and closed his speech was totally appropriate. Some of the finest moments in these terrible times—which, to agree with my noble

friend Lady Foster, none of us wishes to see again—involved the sense of solidarity, togetherness and...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc35-41GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone who has contributed to a really important debate, in terms not only of efficiently dealing with a national crisis of huge relevance to its citizens—I am sure this will not be the only one—but of integrity around a Government and a Parliament in how they...

Member
Baroness Drake (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc38-42GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of the third report of the Constitution Committee on COVID-19 and the use and scrutiny of emergency powers (HL 15 2021-22). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Drake
Answering member
Lord True
Department
Cabinet Office; Constitution Committee
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
21 June 2022
Reference
823 cc21-42GC
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Constitution Committee
Date
7 June 2021
Reference
HL 15 2021-22
House
House of Lords

Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution. Agreed to on question. Committee stage. Clause 1, discussed with other clauses, amendments, Government amendments and Government new clauses, agreed to. Clauses 2 to 87 agreed to, with Government amendments made to clauses 11, 31, 37, 40, 52, 58, 60, 63, 64, 74, 75, 79,...

Lead member
Penny Mordaunt
Department
Treasury; Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 cc101-177
House
House of Commons

I rise merely to refer to the issue of the timing and the length of the Bill. As Members will know, the Minister said in the previous debate that the Government were tabling a new clause that would allow the Bill to be on the statute book for two years...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 cc116-7
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman may be coming to this, but there is one other element: putting this in primary legislation rather than secondary takes it out of the purview of the courts., so here we have one of the heaviest-duty Acts we have seen post war prevented from undergoing judicial review...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 c117
House
House of Commons

I agree, and I do not understand why the Government have gone in this direction. I have been told in several private meetings that it is because they believe that the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 can only be used when they do not know that something is coming down the...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 c117
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman may well be right about the Civil Contingencies Act, because the drafter of that legislation has confirmed that that is his understanding—at least, I believe that to be the case. I agree that two years is too long. I would have preferred the amendment tabled by my...

Member
Andrew Mitchell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 c117
House
House of Commons

I have absolutely no intention of dividing the House. The nation does not need dividing and I do not think the Committee needs dividing on these matters either. I am grateful to the Government, who have tried to be in as listening a mood as they possibly can. My anxiety,...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 c117
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 c118
House
House of Commons

I have to give way to the hon. Gentleman.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 c118
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving way. He has been very gracious in his apology and I thank him very much indeed for that. He says he does not want a Division tonight, which is welcome, and he says that the Government’s amendment is, in his view,...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 c118
House
House of Commons

Personally, I would prefer the time period to be shorter. I would prefer Government Ministers not to be switching powers on and off, because that will lead to them being more queried by the nation at large. I prefer something more like a three-month period when they have these powers,...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2020
Reference
674 c118
House
House of Commons